Seminar Review: Creative Compression Treatment in Challenging Situations

Abstract

There are globally accepted insights and country-specific standards, preferences, and traditions regarding compression therapy. Although there is a wide choice of bandaging and compression materials, the use of these materials must be planned to meet individual patient's temporary needs using the most appropriate technique and optimal timing. Even though indications and contraindications exist for elastic and nonelastic materials and techniques, professionals must use the technical advantages of the several systems for the benefit of the patient. Whatever method is chosen, the effectiveness of compression depends on several technical and personal issues, including the anatomical and functional status of the limb to be treated. Notwithstanding the guidelines for treatment, there will always be situations where either standard or optimal treatment cannot be applied and where clinicians must be creative in the treatment offered. The aim of this article is to reflect on what is possible outside the margins of the normal consensus on compression treatment to stimulate debate.

Keywords

compression treatment guidelines clinical practice variations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gardon-Mollard C. , Ramelet A. La Contention Médicale. Paris, France: Masson; 1999.

Partsch H. , Rabe E. , Stemmer R. Compression Therapy of the Extremities. Paris, France: Editions Phlébologiques Françaises; 1999.

Calne S. , Moffatt C. Understanding compression therapy. Position document of the EWMA Medical Education Partnership Ltd; 2003.

Vin F. , Benigni JP International consensus document. Guidelines according to scientific evidence . Int Angiol. 2004;23:317-345.

Wienert V. , Gerlach H. , Gallenkemper G. , et al. Guidelines of the German Society of Phlebology: medical compression stockings. Phlebologie. 2006;35:315-320.

Partsch H. Indications for compression therapy in venous and lymphatic disease. Consensus based on experimental data and scientific evidence. Int Angiol . In press.

Partsch H. , Clark M. , Bassez S. , et al. Measurement of lower leg compression in vivo: recommendations for the performance of measurements of interface pressure and stiffness. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:224-233.

Cullum N. , Nelson EA , Fletcher AW , Sheldon TA Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000265.

Jünger M. , Wollina U. , Kohnen R. , Rabe E. Efficacy and tolerability of an ulcer compression stocking for therapy of chronic venous ulcer compared with a below-knee compression bandage: results from a prospective, randomized, multicentre trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:1613-1624.

10.

Partsch H, ed. Evidence based compression therapy [special issue]. VASA. 2003;32(Suppl 63).

11.

Couzan D. , Prüfer M. Contention élastique appliqué aux sportifs. In: Gardon-Mollard C , Ramelet A , eds. La Contention Médicale. Paris, France: Masson; 1999:194-203.

12.

Raju S. , Hollis K. , Neglen P. Use of compression stockings in chronic venous disease: patient compliance and efficacy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;21:790-795.

13.

Gniadecka M. Dermal oedema in lipodermatosclerosis: distribution, effects of posture and compressive therapy evaluated by high frequency ultrasonography. Acta Derm Venereol. 1995;75:120-124.

14.

Piérard-Franchimont C. , Letawe C. , Fumal I. , Van Cromphaut I. , Piérard GE Gravitational syndrome and tensile properties of skin in the elderly. Dermatology. 1998;197:317-320.

15.

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm. Accessed December 1, 2007 .

16.

Vaqas B. , Ryan TJ Lymphoedema: pathophysiology and management in resource-poor settings-relevance for lymphatic filariasis control programmes. Filaria J. 2003; 2:4.