Students with complex communication needs (CCN) are guaranteed the right to a free and appropriate public education as well as the supports necessary to make progress in the general education curriculum. However, students with CCN are at risk of not receiving the support needed to fully participate in academic instruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the academic experiences of students with CCN to understand how they participated in instruction and the supports educators implemented for them. We observed students with CCN across the United States and collected student and teacher demographic information from their educators. Sixty-nine students with CCN were included in the present analysis. Communication supports were infrequently implemented in all four educational placements, and 26% of students with CCN in our sample did not use speech, sign, symbols, or a speech-generating device and relied on gestures and/or vocalizations. Few students in segregated classrooms had access to speech-generating devices, and communication supports were only observed to be implemented in these settings during 12%–16% of observations. Implications for research are presented from the perspective of increasing the use of research-based supports for students with CCN to support their academic progress.
Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD.WoodL. (2014). Effects of systematic instruction and an augmentative communication device on phonics skills acquisition for students with moderate intellectual disability who are nonverbal. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 517–532.
2.
AndzikN. R.ChungY.-C.Doneski-NicolJ.DollarhideC. T. (2019). AAC services in schools: A special educator’s perspective. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 65(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1368909
3.
AndzikN. R.ChungY.-C.KranakM. P. (2016). Communication opportunities for elementary school students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1241299
4.
BeukelmanD. R.LightJ. C. (2020). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Brookes.
5.
BiggsE. E.CarterE. W.BumbleJ. L.BarnesK.MazurE. L. (2018). Enhancing peer network interventions for students with complex communication needs. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918792899
6.
BiggsE. E.CarterE. W.GilsonC. B. (2018). Systematic review of interventions involving aided AAC modeling for children with complex communication needs. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(5), 443–473. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.5.443
7.
BiggsE. E.CarterE. W.GilsonC. B. (2019). A scoping review of the involvement of children’s communication partners in aided augmentative and alternative communication modeling interventions. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 28(2), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0024
8.
BiggsE. E.HackerR. E. (2021). Ecological systems for students who use AAC: Stakeholders’ views on factors impacting intervention and outcomes. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(4), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211052309
9.
BoeschM. C.Da FonteM. A.NeffG. C.ShawK. R.MathewL. L.LipofJ. F. (2025). Supporting students with complex communication needs: Special education teachers' reflections on their training. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 41(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2024.2440764
10.
BradyN. C.BruceS.GoldmanA.EricksonK.MineoB.OgletreeB. T.PaulD.RomskiM. A.SevcikR.SiegelE.SchoonoverJ.SnellM.SylvesterL.WilkinsonK. (2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.121
11.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2025). A special issue of the journal of learning disabilities: Full inclusion–beliefs, practices, and evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 58(4), 222194251339464. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251339464
12.
GeeK.GonzalezM.CooperC. (2020). Outcomes of inclusive versus separate placements: A matched pairs comparison study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920943469
13.
IaconoT.GoldbartJ.DouglasS. N.Garcia-MelgarA. (2022). A scoping review and appraisal of AAC research in inclusive school settings. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 34(6), 963–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09835-y
JacksonL. (2019). Academic and communication assessment survey [Unpublished assessment]. University of Northern Colorado.
16.
JamesonM.HicksT.LanseyK.KurthJ. A.JacksonL.ZagonaA. L.BurnetteK.AgranM.ShogrenK.PaceJ.GerasimovaD. (2022). Predictions on the frequency and importance of social contacts across placements: A bayesian multilevel model analysis. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221136538
17.
KleinertH.Towles-ReevesE.QuenemoenR.ThurlowM.FlueggeL.WesemanL.KerbelA. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563697
18.
KurthJ. A.HicksT. A.ShogrenK. A.ZagonaA. L.JamesonJ. M.JacksonL.AgranM.RyndakD. (2025). The relationship between severity of disability and segregated placements for students with complex support needs. The Journal of Special Education, 58(4), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669241256126
19.
KurthJ. A.JacksonL. (2022). Introduction to the special issue on the impact of placement on outcomes for students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221134509
20.
KurthJ. A.Lockman TurnerE. (2019). Ecobehavioral Classroom Assessment Tool (ECAT) Training manual [Unpublished manual]. Department of Special Education, University of Kansas.
21.
KurthJ. A.RupparA. L.McQuestonJ. A.McCabeK. M.JohnstonR.ToewsS. G. (2019). Types of supplementary aids and services for students with significant support needs. Journal of Special Education, 52(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918791156
22.
LightJ.McNaughtonD. (2015). Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1036458
23.
LightJ.McNaughtonD.CaronJ. (2019). New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1557251
24.
MansouriM. C.KurthJ. A.Lockman TurnerE.ZimmermanK. N.FrickT. A. (2022). Comparison of academic and social outcomes of students with extensive support needs across placements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221101792
25.
MirendaP. (2014). Revisiting the mosaic of supports required for including people with severe intellectual or developmental disabilities in their communities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.875590
26.
MoorcroftA.MeyerC. (2019). A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(7), 710–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1499135
27.
MorinK. L.GanzJ. B.GregoriE. V.FosterM. J.GerowS. L.Genç-TosunD.HongE. R. (2018). A systematic quality review of high-tech AAC interventions as an evidence-based practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1458900
RaghavendraP.OlssonC.SampsonJ.McInerneyR.ConnellT. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.653604
30.
ToewsS. G.JohnstonR.KurthJ. A.RupparA. L.McQuestonJ. A.McCabeK. M. (2021). Alignment of supplementary aids and services with student needs and placement. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 59(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-59.3.187
31.
TönsingK. M.DadaS.AlantE. (2014). Teaching graphic symbol combinations to children with limited speech during shared story reading. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(4), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.965846
32.
TurnbullH. R.TurnbullA. P.CooperD. H. (2018). The supreme court, Endrew, and the appropriate education of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917734150
33.
ZagonaA. L.KurthJ. A.Lockman TurnerE.PaceJ.ShogrenK.LanseyK.JamesonM.BurnetteK.MansouriM.HicksT.GerasimovaD. (2022). Ecobehavioral analysis of the experiences of students with complex support needs in different classroom types. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221126496
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
