Walking During Daily Life Can Be Validly and Responsively Assessed in Subjects With a Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract

Objective. This study assessed the validity and responsiveness of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM II) items indoor mobility, mobility for moderate distances, and outdoor mobility. Methods. The data of 886 spinal cord injury subjects were derived from the European Multicenter Study for Human Spinal Cord Injury (EM-SCI) and analyzed at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after injury. The SCIM II items were compared using the preferred walking speed and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II). The responsiveness to assess differences over time was determined. The analyses were performed for subjects with varying impairment scales according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). Results. An initially moderate correlation between walking capacity and the SCIM II mobility items improved to excellent at 6 and 12 months after injury. The correlations were higher for indoor mobility compared with outdoor mobility. These correlations increased in ASIA C, but decreased over time in ASIA D subjects. The SCIM II mobility items showed initially positive responsiveness in ASIA A and B subjects. In ASIA C and D subjects, SCIM II responsiveness was significant within the first 6 months. Conclusions . The SCIM II items assess mobility (wheelchair and walking) during daily life. They show good validity and responsiveness, including postdischarge. They can be considered appropriate for evaluating the efficacy of new interventions on ambulatory function. Depending on the severity of the initial lesion and time of assessment, clinically applied walking tests can accurately predict walking performance during daily life.

Keywords

Walking speed Spinal cord independence measure Traumatic SCI WISCI

References

Curt A. , Schwab ME , Dietz V. Providing the clinical basis for new interventional therapies: refined diagnosis and assessment of recovery after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:1-6.

Ditunno JF Jr , Burns AS , Marino RJ Neurological and functional capacity outcome measures: essential to spinal cord injury clinical trials. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:35-41.

Ditunno PL , Ditunno JF Jr. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:654-656.

van Hedel HJ , Wirz M. , Curt A. Improving walking assessment in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury: responsiveness. Spinal Cord . 2006; 44:352-356.

van Hedel HJ , Wirz M. , Dietz V. Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:190-196.

Barbeau H. , Elashoff R. , Deforge D. , Ditunno J. , Saulino M. , Dobkin BH Comparison of speeds used for the 15.2-meter and 6-minute walks over the year after an incomplete spinal cord injury: the SCILT Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:302-306.

Dobkin B. , Apple D. , Barbeau H. , et al. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006 ;66:484-493.

Dobkin B. , Barbeau H. , Deforge D. , et al. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:25-35.

Catz A. , Itzkovich M. , Steinberg F. , et al. The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure. Disabil Rehabil. 2001 ;23:263-268.

10.

Husted JA , Cook RJ , Farewell VT , Gladman DD Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations . J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459-468.

11.

Asia. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, Revised 2002. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association; 2002.

12.

van Hedel HJ , Wirz M. , Dietz V. Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach. Neurol Res. 2008;30:61-73.

13.

Beaton DE , Hogg-Johnson S. , Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50: 79-93.

14.

Garratt AM , Ruta DA , Abdalla MI , Russell IT SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions. Qual Health Care. 1994;3:186-192.

15.

Liang MH , Fossel AH , Larson MG Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990;28:632-642.

16.

Ditunno JF Jr , Barbeau H. , Dobkin BH , et al. Validity of the walking scale for spinal cord injury and other domains of function in a multicenter clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:539-550.

17.

Dobkin BH , Apple D. , Barbeau H. , et al. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:153-167.

18.

Wirz M. , van Hedel HJ , Rupp R. , Curt A. , Dietz V. Muscle force and gait performance: relationships after spinal cord injury . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1218-1222.

19.

Burns AS , Lee BS , Ditunno JF Jr , Tessler A. Patient selection for clinical trials: the reliability of the early spinal cord injury examination. J Neurotraum. 2003;20:477-482.

20.

van Hedel HJ , Wirth B. , Dietz V. Limits of locomotor ability in subjects with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43:593-603.

21.

Barbeau H. , Fung J. , Leroux A. , Ladouceur M. A review of the adaptability and recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res. 2002;137:9-25.

22.

Catz A. , Itzkovich M. , Tesio L. , et al. A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:275-291.