This study explores the relationships between principal growth mindset, readiness to use artificial intelligence, self-efficacy, and openness to change. Specifically, we developed and tested a theoretical model where we treated principal growth mindset as the independent variable, readiness to use artificial intelligence as the outcome, and self-efficacy and openness to change as mediators. Data were collected from 328 principals employed in Turkish schools and analysed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Results indicate that principal growth mindset is related to readiness to use artificial intelligence directly and indirectly via self-efficacy and openness to change. Situated within the broader scholarly discourse on artificial intelligence in educational leadership, this study highlights the cognitive and psychological capacities necessary for leading the integration of artificial intelligence in schools. Practically, the findings suggest that leadership development programs should incorporate growth mindset training, strategies to enhance self-efficacy, and opportunities for principals to build adaptive attitudes toward change.
AbernethyMAAndersonSWNairS, et al. (2021) Manager ‘growth mindset’ and resource management practices. Accounting, Organizations and Society91: 1–21.
2.
AdamsDThompsonP (2025) Transforming school leadership with artificial intelligence: Applications, implications, and future directions. Leadership and Policy in Schools24(1): 77–89.
3.
AllevatoE (2020) Organizational culture change: Growth mindset, positive psychology, and empowerment. In: MarquesJDhimanS (eds) Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility: Management for Professionals. Cham: Springer, 439–454.
4.
AnysiadouMGkliatiA (2025) An experimental analysis of Greek school leaders’ readiness for AI integration. Leadership and Policy in Schools24(1): 155–177.
5.
ArarKTliliASchunkaL, et al. (2025) Reimagining educational leadership and management through artificial intelligence: An integrative systematic review. Leadership and Policy in Schools24(1): 4–26.
BanduraA (1986) Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
BellibaşMŞPolatcanMAkyürekMİ (2024) Principal leadership typologies and their relationship with teacher self-efficacy and commitment: A latent profile mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(6): 1497–1518.
9.
BerkovichIHassanT (2024) Principals’ digital instructional leadership during the pandemic: Impact on teachers’ intrinsic motivation and students’ learning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(4): 934–954.
10.
BernerthJBColeMSTaylorEC, et al. (2018) Control variables in leadership research: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Management44(1): 131–160.
11.
BixlerKCeballosM (2025) Principals leading AI in schools for instructional leadership: A conceptual model for principal AI use. Leadership and Policy in Schools24(1): 137–154.
12.
BöcherLM, 2024. Acceptance of artificial intelligence in the workplace: The influence of employees fixed or growth mindset on AI acceptance. Master’s thesis. Universidade Catolica Portuguesa.
13.
CarolusAKochMJStrakaS, et al. (2023) MAILS Meta AI literacy scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well-founded competency models and psychological change- and meta-competencies. Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans1(2): 1–10.
14.
ChenLChenPLinZ (2020) Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access8: 75264–75278.
15.
ChernissC (1993) Role of professional self-efficacy in the etiology and amelioration of burnout. In: SchaufeliWBMaslachCMarekT (eds) Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 135–143.
DexterSRichardsonJWNashJB (2019) Leadership for technology use, integration, and innovation: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education51(4): 318–335.
18.
DweckCS (2000) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
19.
DweckCS (2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
FelembanHSohailMRuikarK (2024) Exploring the readiness of organisations to adopt artificial intelligence. Buildings14(8): 1–21.
22.
FraenkelJRWallenNE (2006) How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
FrondozoCEKingRBNalipayMJN, et al. (2022) Mindsets matter for teachers, too: Growth mindset about teaching ability predicts teachers’ enjoyment and engagement. Current Psychology41(8): 5030–5033.
24.
FullanM (2016) The new meaning of educational change, 5th ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
25.
FullanMAzorínCHarrisA, et al. (2024) Artificial intelligence and school leadership: Challenges, opportunities and implications. School Leadership & Management44(4): 339–346.
26.
GuanCMouJJiangZ (2020) Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies4(4): 134–147.
27.
HambletonRKPatsulaL (1998) Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research45(1): 153–171.
28.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (pp. 34–40). London & New York: Guilford Press.
29.
HejaziSYSadoughiMDatuJAD (2024) The relative importance of growth teaching mindset, emotions, and self-efficacy in teachers’ grit. International Journal of Applied Linguistics35: 629–642.
30.
HongJW (2022) I was born to love AI: The influence of social status on AI self-efficacy and intentions to use AI. International Journal of Communication16: 172–191.
31.
HsuTCAbelsonHPattonE, et al. (2022) Self-efficacy and behaviour patterns of learners using a real-time collaboration system developed for group programming. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning16(4): 559–582.
32.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
33.
JustusKArghodeVBarkerD (2023) Principal self-efficacy, mindset and performance outcomes: Exploring the connection. European Journal of Training and Development47(5/6): 565–585.
34.
KamalovFSantandreuDGurribI (2023) New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability15(16): 1–27.
35.
KarakoseTTülübaşT (2024) School leadership and management in the age of artificial intelligence (AI): Recent developments and future prospects. Educational Process: International Journal13(1): 7–14.
36.
KhanF (2025) Transformational leadership and teacher work performance: Mediating effect of job autonomy and trust in school principal–insights from senior secondary school data in India. Educational Management Administration & Leadership53(2): 318–338.
37.
KimMSParkS (2021) Growth of fixed mindset from elementary to middle school: Its relationship with trajectories of academic behavior engagement and academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools58(11): 2175–2188.
38.
KlineP (2010) An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
39.
KreinU (2025) Exploring the transformative impact of technology on school leadership: Affordances, practices, implications. Leadership and Policy in Schools24(1): 90–102.
40.
LaouniN (2023) School principals’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration in Moroccan public schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management11(1): 25–61.
41.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2008) Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly44(4): 496–528.
42.
LeithwoodKHarrisAHopkinsD (2008) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management28(1): 27–42.
43.
LiCAshrafSFAminS, et al. (2023) Consequence of resistance to change on AI readiness: Mediating–moderating role of task-oriented leadership and high-performance work system in the hospitality sector. Sage Open13(4): 1–15.
44.
LinWYinHLiuZ (2022) The roles of transformational leadership and growth mindset in teacher professional development: The mediation of teacher self-efficacy. Sustainability14(11): 1–13.
45.
LiuQTongY (2022) Employee growth mindset and innovative behavior: The roles of employee strengths use and strengths-based leadership. Frontiers in Psychology13: 1–12.
46.
LouisKSLeithwoodKWahlstromKL, et al. (2010) Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. New York: The Wallace Foundation.
47.
MacKenzieSBPodsakoffPM (2012) Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing88(4): 542–555.
NalipayMJNKingRBMordenoIG, et al. (2021) Teachers with a growth mindset are motivated and engaged: The relationships among mindsets, motivation, and engagement in teaching. Social Psychology of Education24(6): 1663–1684.
56.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2019) TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.
57.
PietschMMahDK (2025) Leading the AI transformation in schools: It starts with a digital mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development73: 1043–1069.
58.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-Y, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
59.
QureshiASKhanUARazaMA (2023) Relationship of growth mindset of secondary school heads with their job behavior of Multan district, Punjab. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences4(3): 1–7.
60.
RaffertyAEGriffinMA (2006) Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology91(5): 1154–1162.
61.
RhewEPiroJSGoolkasianP, et al. (2018) The effects of a growth mindset on self-efficacy and motivation. Cogent Education5(1): 1–16.
62.
RichardsonJWVedderBCRobertsAB, et al. (2025) What’s the chatter about AI and school leaders?Leadership and Policy in Schools24(1): 103–116.
63.
SalhaSMousaAKhayatS (2025) Artificial intelligence in education (AIED) policies in school context: A mixed approach research. Leadership and Policy in Schools24(1): 27–45.
64.
SchildkampK (2019) Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational Research61(3): 257–273.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 7th ed.Boston, MA: Pearson.
67.
TołwińskaB (2021) The role of principals in learning schools to support teachers’ use of digital technologies. Technology, Knowledge and Learning26(1): 917–930.
68.
Tschannen-MoranMGareisCR (2004) Principals’ sense of efficacy: Assessing a promising construct. Journal of Educational Administration42(5): 573–585.
69.
Tschannen-MoranMGareisCR (2007) Cultivating principals’ sense of efficacy: What supports matter?Journal of School Leadership17(1): 89–114.
VenkateshMDavisD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly27(3): 425–478.
72.
WanbergCRBanasJT (2000) Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology85(1): 132–142.
73.
WangXLiLTanSC, et al. (2023) Preparing for AI-enhanced education: Conceptualizing and empirically examining teachers’ AI readiness. Computers in Human Behavior146: 1–11.
74.
WitthöftJAydinBPietschM (2024) Leading digital innovation in schools: The role of the open innovation mindset. Journal of Research on Technology in Education: 1–20. 10.1080/15391523.2024.2398528.
YeagerDSDweckCS (2012) Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist47(4): 302–314.
77.
YilmazBToreE (2025) The mediating role of self-efficacy in the effect of school principals’ transformational leadership characteristics on teachers’ innovative work behavior. Leadership and Policy in Schools: 1–20. 10.1080/15700763.2025.2462741.
78.
ZarrinabadiNJamalvandiBRezazadehM (2023) Investigating fixed and growth teaching mindsets and self-efficacy as predictors of language teachers’ burnout and professional identity. Language Teaching Research: 1–23. 10.1177/13621688231151787.
79.
ZarrinabadiNRezazadehMKarimiM, et al. (2022) Why do growth mindsets make you feel better about learning and your selves? The mediating role of adaptability. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching16(3): 249–264.
80.
ZhaoXTanGWongCH (2020) The impact of self-efficacy, growth mindset, empowerment and training on employees’ innovation capability: A conceptual framework. Inti Journal2020(40): 1–10.
