Case Formulation for Futures-Focused Coaching: An Adaptive Polarity Framework

Abstract

Leaders facing adaptive challenges must navigate competing demands and persistent tensions that resist resolution. Coaches increasingly integrate futures thinking to develop adaptive capacity, an orientation we term “futures-focused coaching,” yet case formulation frameworks for adaptive challenges are lacking. Through a personal construct analysis of 24 coaches, we identified three adaptive polarities: temporal (present-moment grounding ↔ future visioning, 75% of participants), systemic (individual agency ↔ systemic engagement, 67%), and strategic (responsive adaptation ↔ intentional direction, 58%). Building on Lane's case formulation approach, polarity management theory, and adaptive leadership frameworks, we develop pattern recognition criteria for formulating complex cases. Implications span coaching practice and case formulation.

Keywords

Futures-focused coaching case formulation adaptive polarities polarity management personal construct theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Fattal

Singh

(2025). Comparative reflections on human-driven and generative artificial intelligence-assisted thematic analysis: A collaborative autoethnography. Sage Open.

Anthropic. (2025). Claude 4.5 [Large language model]. https://www.anthropic.com.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burr

King

(2019). Qualitative analysis of repertory grids: Interpretive clustering. Personal Construct Theory & Practice, 19(3), 678–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1794088

Burr

King

Heckmann

(2020). The qualitative analysis of repertory grid data: Interpretive clustering. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(3), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1794088

Cavanagh

(2013). The coaching engagement in the twenty-first century: New paradigms for complex times. In David

Clutterbuck

Megginson

(Eds.), Beyond goals: Effective strategies for coaching and mentoring (pp. 151–184). Gower Publishing.

Cavanagh

Lane

(2012). Coaching psychology coming of age: The challenges we face in the messy world of complexity. International Coaching Psychology Review, 7(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2012.7.1.75

Christou

P. A.

(2023). How to use artificial intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research? The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 1968–1980. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406

Clarke

(2013). Model of complexity leadership development. Human Resource Development International, 16(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2012.756155

10.

Clutterbuck

(2013). Working with emergent goals: A pragmatic approach. In David

Clutterbuck

Megginson

(Eds.), Beyond goals: Effective strategies for coaching and mentoring (pp. 289–300). Gower Publishing.

11.

Creswell

(2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.

12.

Day

D. V.

(2001). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8

13.

Donnelly

(2020). Leading change: The theory and practice of integrative polarity work. World Futures, 76(8), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2020.1801310

14.

Fransella

Bell

Bannister

(2004). A manual for repertory grid technique (2nd ed.). Wiley.

15.

Heifetz

Grashow

Linsky

(2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organisation and the world. Harvard Business Press.

16.

Hitch

(2024). Artificial intelligence augmented qualitative analysis: The way of the future? Qualitative Health Research, 34(7), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231217392

17.

Jackson

(2005). How do we describe coaching? An exploratory development of a typology of coaching based on the accounts of UK-based practitioners. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 3(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/174183050500300205

18.

Jankowicz

(2004). The easy guide to repertory grids. Chichester: Wiley.

19.

Johnson

(1996). Polarity management. Human Resource Development Press.

20.

Johnstone

Dallos

(2006). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people's problems. Routledge.

21.

Kaiser

R. B.

Overfield

D. V.

(2010). Assessing flexible leadership as a mastery of opposites. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019987

22.

Kelly

(1955). The psychology of personal constructs: Volume 1: Theory and personality. Norton & Company.

23.

Kovács

L. C.

Corrie

(2021). Formulation as a foundation for navigating complexity in executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 73(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000202

24.

Lane

D. A.

Corrie

(2009). Does coaching psychology need the concept of formulation? International Coaching Psychology Review, 4(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2009.4.2.195

25.

Lane

D. A.

Corrie

Kovács

L. C.

(2025). A guide to formulation in coaching. Routledge.

26.

Lichtenstein

B. B.

Plowman

D. A.

(2009). The leadership of emergence: A complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.006

27.

Manderscheid

S. V.

Freeman

P. D.

(2012). Managing polarity, paradox, and dilemma during leader transition. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(9), 856–872. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211280937

28.

Manderscheid

S. V.

Harrower

N. L.

(2016). A qualitative study of leader transition and polarities. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(3), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422316645888

29.

Miller

(2015). Learning, the future, and complexity. An essay on the emergence of futures literacy. European Journal of Education, 50(4), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12157

30.

Miller

(2018). Futures literacy: Transforming the future. In Miller

(Ed.), Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century (pp. 1–12). Routledge.

31.

Miller

Sandford

(2019). Futures literacy: The capacity to diversify conscious human anticipation. In Poli

(Ed.), Handbook of anticipation: Theoretical and applied aspects of the use of future in decision making (1st ed, pp. 73–91). Springer.

32.

Morgan

D. L.

(2023). Exploring the use of artificial intelligence for qualitative data analysis: The case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248

33.

Morin

(2008). On complexity. Hampton Press.

34.

Niemeyer

(2012). Assessment of personal constructs: Features and functions of constructivist techniques.. In Caputi

Viney

Walker

Crittenden

(Eds.), Personal construct methodology (1st ed., pp. 26–93). Wiley-Blackwell.

35.

O'Broin

Palmer

(2010). Exploring key aspects in the formation of coaching relationships: Initial indicators from the perspective of the coachee and the coach. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3(2), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2010.502902

36.

Poli

(2010). An introduction to the ontology of anticipation. Futures, 42(7), 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.028

37.

Poli

(2013). A note on the difference between complicated and complex social systems. Cadmus, 2(1), 142–147.

38.

Poli

(2017). Introduction to Anticipation Studies (Vol. 1). Springer.

39.

Prigogine

Stengers

(1997). The end of certainty. The Free Press.

40.

Procter

H. G.

Ugazio

(2017). Family constructs and semantic polarities: A convergent perspective? In Winter

D. A.

Cummins

Procter

H. G.

Reed

(Eds.), Personal construct psychology at 60: Papers from the 21st international congress (pp. 68–89). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

41.

Roberts

Baker

Andrew

(2024). Artificial intelligence and qualitative research: The promise and perils of large language model (LLM) “assistance”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 99, 102722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102722

42.

Snowden

D. J.

Boone

M. E.

(2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.

43.

Stacey

R. D.

(1995). The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160606

44.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2019). A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(4), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7040023

45.

Stojnov

Džinović

Pavlović

Frances

(eds) (2011). Personal construct psychology in an accelerating world. EPCA Publications.

46.

Stojnov

Pavlovic

(2010). An invitation to personal construct coaching: From personal construct therapy to personal construct coaching. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2010.5.2.129

47.

Uhl-Bien

Arena

(2017). Complexity leadership: Enabling people and organizations for adaptability. Organizational Dynamics, 46(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.12.001

48.

Uhl-Bien

Arena

(2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009