The water-permeability, moisture-diffusivity, and sorptivity concepts of modeling liquid water transport in porous building materials are analyzed. An overall assessment of the particular models is performed using the moisture profiles measured for two types of autoclaved aerated concrete. The water-permeability and moisture-diffusivity modeling approaches are found suitable from a point of view of accuracy of moisture-transport simulation but they have certain limitations. While the water-permeability concept is advisable for compact materials, the moisture-diffusivity concept should be preferred for materials with a high water penetration rate. Therefore, a combination of both these approaches in a single laboratory is beneficial. The sorptivity concept, on the other hand, can be recommended for a basic assessment of water transport capabilities of building materials only.
AmnadnuaKTangchirapatWJaturapitakkulC (2013) Strength, water permeability, and heat evolution of high strength concrete made from the mixture of calcium carbide residue and fly ash. Materials & Design51: 894–901.
2.
BearJ (1988) Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. New York: Dover Publications.
3.
BodnerGSchollPLoiskandlW. (2013) Environmental and management influences on temporal variability of near saturated soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma204: 120–129.
4.
BombergMPazeraMPlaggeR (2005) Analysis of selected water absorption coefficient measurements. Journal of Building Physics28: 227–243.
5.
CarmelietJHensHRoelsS. (2004) Determination of the liquid water diffusivity from transient moisture transfer experiments. Journal of Building Physics27: 277–305.
6.
ČernýR (ed.) (2013) Complex System of Methods for Directed Design and Assessment of Functional Properties of Building Materials and Its Applications. Prague: Czech Technical University in Prague.
7.
ČernýRRovnaníkováP (2002) Transport Processes in Concrete. London: Spon Press.
8.
CrankJ (1975) The Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9.
DavieCTPearceCJBicanicN (2012) Aspects of permeability in modelling of concrete exposed to high temperatures. Transport in Porous Media95: 627–646.
10.
DesmettreCCharronJ-P (2012) Water permeability of reinforced concrete with and without fiber subjected to static and constant tensile loading. Cement and Concrete Research42: 945–952.
11.
DrchalováJČernýR (1998) Non-steady-state methods for determining the moisture diffusivity of porous materials. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer25: 109–116.
12.
GreenKMHoffWDCarterMA. (1999) A high pressure permeameter for the measurement of liquid conductivity of porous construction materials. Review of Scientific Instruments70: 3397–3401.
13.
GuillardVChevillardAGastaldiE. (2013) Water transport mechanisms in wheat gluten based (nano)composite materials. European Polymer Journal49: 1337–1346.
14.
HallC (1989) Water sorptivity of mortars and concretes: a review. Magazine of Concrete Research41: 51–61.
15.
HammingRW (1962) The Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
HeYAlamZ (2013) Moisture absorption and diffusion in an underfill encapsulant at T > T (g) and T < T (g). Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry113: 461–466.
17.
IoannouIHamiltonAHallC (2008) Capillary absorption of water and n-decane by autoclaved aerated concrete. Cement and Concrete Research38: 766–771.
18.
JanzM (2002) Moisture diffusivities evaluated at high moisture levels from a series of water absorption tests. Materials and Structures34: 141–148.
19.
KočíVMaděraJČernýR (2013) Computer aided design of interior thermal insulation system suitable for autoclaved aerated concrete structures. Applied Thermal Engineering58: 165–172.
20.
KoronthalyovaO (2011) Moisture storage capacity and microstructure of ceramic brick and autoclaved aerated concrete. Construction and Building Materials25: 879–885.
21.
KumaranMK (1999) Moisture diffusivity of building materials from water absorption measurements. Journal of Building Physics22: 349–355.
22.
LichnerLHallettPDDrongováZ. (2013) Algae influence the hydrophysical parameters of a sandy soil. Catena108: 58–68.
23.
McDonnellCKAllenPDugganE. (2013) The effect of salt and fibre direction on water dynamics, distribution and mobility in pork muscle: a low field NMR study. Meat Science95: 51–58.
24.
MaděraJKočíJKočíV. (2010) Computational prediction of hygrothermal conditions in innovated AAC-based building envelopes. In: SundenBManderUBrebbiaCA (eds) Advanced Computational Methods and Experiments in Heat Transfer XI. Southampton: WIT Press, pp. 291–301.
25.
MualemY (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Water Resources Research12: 513–522.
26.
NarayananNRamamurthyK (2000) Structure and properties of aerated concrete: a review. Cement and Concrete Composites22: 321–329.
27.
NgcoboMEKPatharePBDeleleMA. (2013) Moisture diffusivity of table grape stems during low temperature storage conditions. Biosystems Engineering115: 346–353.
28.
NizovtsevMIStankusSVSterlyagovAN. (2008) Determination of moisture diffusivity in porous materials using gamma-method. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer51: 4161–4167.
29.
OzunaCPuigAGarcia-PerezJV. (2013) Influence of high intensity ultrasound application on mass transport, microstructure and textural properties of pork meat (Longissimus dorsi) brined at different NaCl concentrations. Journal of Food Engineering119: 84–93.
30.
PerazziniHFreireFBFreireJT (2013) Drying kinetics prediction of solid waste using semi-empirical and artificial neural network models. Chemical Engineering & Technology36: 1193–1201.
31.
PhilipJRDe VriesDA (1957) Moisture movement in porous materials under temperature gradients. Transactions: American Geophysical Union38: 222–232.
32.
PleinertHSadoukiHWittmannFH (1998) Determination of moisture distributions in porous building materials by neutron transmission analysis. Materials and Structures31: 218–224.
33.
PoyetS (2013) Determination of the intrinsic permeability to water of cementitious materials: influence of the water retention curve. Cement & Concrete Composites35: 127–135.
34.
PoyetSCharlesSHonoreN. (2011) Assessment of the unsaturated water transport properties of an old concrete: determination of the pore-interaction factor. Cement and Concrete Research41: 1015–1023.
35.
QiuXHaghighatFKumaranMK (2003) Moisture transport across interface between autoclaved aerated concrete and mortar. Journal of Building Physics26: 213–236.
36.
RoelsSCarmelietJHensH. (2004) Interlaboratory comparison of hygric properties of porous building materials. Journal of Building Physics27: 307–325.
37.
SchefflerGA (2011) Methods for moisture storage and transport property determination of autoclaved aerated concrete (Special issue). Cement Wapno Beton16/78: 70–77.
38.
SchefflerGAPlaggeR (2011) Introduction of a full-range model for liquid and vapor transport properties of autoclaved aerated concrete (Special issue). Cement Wapno Beton 16/78: 53–59.
39.
SchoberG (2011) Porosity in autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC): a review on pore structure, types of porosity, measurement methods and effects of porosity on properties (Special issue). Cement Wapno Beton 16/78: 39–43.
40.
SidhuSHuangQCarrowRN. (2013) Laccase mediated changes in physical and chemical composition properties of thatch layer in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.). Soil Biology & Biochemistry64: 48–56.
41.
SongHWPackSWNamSH. (2010) Estimation of the permeability of silica fume cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials24: 315–321.
42.
Van der SmanRGMMeindersMBJ (2013) Moisture diffusivity in food materials. Food Chemistry138: 1265–1274.
43.
VejmelkováEPavlíkováMJermanM. (2009) Free water intake as means of material characterization. Journal of Building Physics33: 29–44.
