Is telling stories politically effective? Recent debates around the efficacy of storytelling have challenged the view that narratives are an effective means of political persuasion. This article empirically examines the persuasiveness of narratives through the lens of recent controversies over same-sex marriage. Through a survey-experiment, I test the effects of different kinds of arguments on heterosexuals' views on same-sex marriage. I find some support for long-standing claims of the efficacy of stories; however, stories are not always effective, and their perceived efficacy outstrips their actual efficacy.The findings suggest that narrative appeals along with non-narrative appeals that directly challenge ideas of same-sex marriage as inherently a religious issue are most likely to induce greater favourability toward same-sex marriage.The results help specify the types of issues for which narrative appeals might be expected to be effective, ineffective, or counterproductive, and further illuminate cultural dimensions of debates over same-sex marriage.
Aamodt, S. and Wang, S. (2008) Welcome to Your Brain: Why You Lose Your Car Keys but Never Forget How to Drive and Other Puzzles of Everyday Life. New York: Bloomsbury.
2.
Bowman, K. and O'Keefe, B. (2004) `Attitudes about Homosexuality and Gay Marriage' , American Enterprise Institute: Studies in Public Opinion, URL (consulted December 2007): http://www.aei.org/docLib/20050121_HOMOSEXUALITY.pdf
3.
Brader, T. (2005) `Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions', American Political Science Review49(3): 388-405.
4.
Brewer, P. (2002) `Framing, Value Words, and Citizens' Explanations of Their Issue Opinions', Political Communication19(3): 303-16.
5.
Brounk, T. (1996) `Changing Negative Attitudes toward Gay and Lesbian People: The Impact of Cognition versus Affect', PhD thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.
6.
Carmines, E. and Stimson, J. (1980) `The Two Faces of Issue Voting', American Political Science Review74(1): 78-91.
7.
Cobb, M.D. and Kuklinski, J.H. (1997) `Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion', American Journal of Political Science41(1): 88-121.
8.
Craig, S., Martinez, M., Kane, J. and Gainous, J. (2005) `Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizens' Ambivalence About Gay Rights', Political Research Quarterly58(1): 5-17.
9.
Dooley, D. (2001) Social Research Methods. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Edwards, K. (1990) `The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation and Change', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(2): 202-16.
11.
Edwards, K. and Von Hippel, W. (1995) `Hearts and Minds: The Priority of Affective versus Cognitive Factors in Person Perception', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21(3): 996-1011.
12.
Gerrig, R.J. (1993) Experiencing Narrative Worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Gilbert, D. (1991) `How Mental Systems Believe', American Psychologist46(1): 106-19.
14.
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
15.
Gladwell, M. (2005) Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. New York: Little, Brown.
16.
Green, M. and Brock, T. (2000) `The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79(5): 701-21.
17.
Greenpeace (2005) `Countering the Skeptics', URL (consulted December 2007): http://archive.greenpeace.org/climate/industry/reports/sceptics.html
18.
Hovland, C., Janis, I. and Kelley, H. (1953) Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Human Rights Campaign (2005), URL (consulted December 2007): www.hrc.org
20.
Lakoff, G. (2004) Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate - The Essential Guide for Progressives. New York: Chelsea Green.
21.
Loftus, J. (2001) `America's Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 to 1998', American Sociological Review66(5): 762-82.
22.
McGuire, W. and Papageorgis, D. (1962) `Effectiveness of Forewarning in Developing Resistance to Persuasion', Public Opinion Quarterly26(1): 24-34.
23.
Perloff, R. (2003) The Dynamics of Persuasion. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1981) Attitudes and Persuasion: Classical and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
25.
Polletta, F. (1998) `Contending Stories: Narrative in Social Movements' , Qualitative Sociology21(4): 419-46.
26.
Polletta, F. (2006) It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Reyes, R.M., Thompson, W.C. and Bower, G.H. (1980) `Judgment Biases Resulting from Differing Availabilities of Arguments', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39(1): 2-12.
28.
Sears, D. (1986) `College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(3): 515-30.
29.
Sears, D.O. and Funk, C.L. (1999) `Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions', Journal of Politics61(1): 1-28.
30.
Slater, M.D. (1997) `Persuasion Processes across Receiver Goals and Message Genres', Communication Theory7(2): 125-48.
31.
Slater, M. and Rouner, D. (2002) `Entertainment-Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Process of Narrative Persuasion', Communication Theory12(2): 173-91.
32.
Snow, D. and Benford, R. (1992) `Master Frames and Cycles of Protest', in A. Morris and C. Mueller (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, pp. 133-55. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
Stangor, C., Sullivan, L. and Ford, T. (1991) `Affective and Cognitive Determinants of Prejudice' , Social Cognition9(3): 359-80.
34.
Yang, A. (1997) `Trends: Attitudes toward Homosexuality', Public Opinion Quarterly61(3): 477-507.
