To improve performance and facilitate sport-specific skill acquisition, the challenges encountered by the athlete during competition must be understood. Quantitative evidence used to design and motivate specific modifications in movement technique often requires systematic experimentation conducted in realistic contexts. In some cases, laboratory-based experimentation and dynamic modeling can be integrated to determine how athletes are generating the forces causing the observed movements. These approaches help us ascertain why certain factors affect performance. Results can then be used as a basis for designing skill progressions used to improve performance. Examples provided in this article illustrate how the use of technology, software, and experimental-based engineering tools has facilitated skill acquisition and improved the performance of skills essential for competition in gymnastics, track and field, basketball, and volleyball.
MillerDINelsonRC. Biomechanics of sport: a research approach. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1973.
2.
RameyMR. Force relationships of the running long jump. Med Sci Sport1970; 2(3): 146–151.
3.
DillmanCJ. Kinematic analyses of running. Exerc Sport Sci Rev1975; 3: 193–218.
4.
RaibertMH. Symmetry in running. Science1986; 231(4743): 1292–1294.
5.
HayJ. Cycle rate, length, and speed of progression in human locomotion. J Appl Biomech2002; 18: 257–270.
6.
WeyandPGSternlightDBBellizziMJ. Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. J Appl Physiol2000; 89(5): 1991–1999.
7.
MillerDIHennigEPizzimentiMA. Kinetic and kinematic characteristics of 10-m platform performances of elite divers: I. Back takeoffs. Int J Sport Biomech1989; 3: 60–88.
8.
MillerDIJonesIPizzimentiMA. Kinetic and kinematic characteristics of 10-m platform performances of elite divers: II. Reverse takeoffs. Int J Sport Biomech1990; 6: 283–306.
9.
SchadeFArampatzisABrüggemannG-P. Comparison of the men’s and the women’s pole vault at the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games. J Sport Sci2004; 22(9): 835–842.
10.
ArampatzisASchadeFBrüggemannG-P. Effect of the pole–human body interaction on pole vaulting performance. J Biomech2004; 37(9): 1353–1360.
11.
DempseyARElliottBCMunroBJ. Whole body kinematics and knee moments that occur during an overhead catch and landing task in sport. Clin Biomech2012; 27(5): 466–474.
12.
YeadonMR. The biomechanics of the human in flight. Am J Sport Med1997; 25(4): 575–580.
13.
DapenaJ. Mechanics of rotation in the Fosbury-flop. Med Sci Sport Exer1979; 12(1): 45–53.
14.
DapenaJ. A method to determine the angular momentum of a human body about three orthogonal axes passing through its center of gravity. J Biomech1978; 11(5): 251–256.
15.
HubbardMAlawaysLW. Rapid and accurate estimation of release conditions in the javelin throw. J Biomech1989; 22(6–7): 583–595.
16.
HubbardMDe MestreNJScottJ. Dependence of release variables in the shot put. J Biomech2001; 34(4): 449–456.
17.
YeadonMR. The simulation of aerial movement—I. The determination of orientation angles from film data. J Biomech1990; 23(1): 59–66.
18.
YeadonMR. The simulation of aerial movement—III. The determination of the angular momentum of the human body. J Biomech1990; 23(1): 75–83.
19.
JonesIMillerDI. Influence of fulcrum position on springboard response and takeoff performance in the running approach. J Appl Biomech1996; 12: 383–408.
20.
MillerDIOsborneMJJonesI. Springboard oscillation during hurdle flight. J Sport Sci1998; 16(6): 571–583.
21.
MillerDIZecevicATaylorGW. Hurdle preflight in springboard diving: a case of diminishing returns. Res Q Exerc Sport2002; 73(2): 134–145.
22.
RansonCKingMABurnettA. The effect of coaching intervention on elite fast bowling technique over a two year period. Sports Biomech2009; 8(4): 261–274.
23.
KingMAKentelBBMitchellSR. The effects of ball impact location and grip tightness on the arm, racquet and ball for one-handed tennis backhand groundstrokes. J Biomech2012; 45(6): 1048–1052.
24.
KingMAYeadonMR. Quantifying elbow extension and elbow hyperextension in cricket bowling: a case study of Jenny Gunn. J Sport Sci2012; 30(9): 937–947.
25.
WorthingtonPJKingMARansonCA. Relationships between fast bowling technique and ball release speed in cricket. J Appl Biomech2013; 29(1): 78–84.
26.
GittoesMJRIrwinGMullineauxDR. Whole-body and multi-joint kinematic control strategy variability during backward rotating dismounts from beam. J Sport Sci2011; 29(10): 1051–1058.
27.
SprigingsEMillerDI. Optimal knee extension timing in springboard and platform dives from the reverse group. J Appl Biomech2004; 20: 275–290.
28.
BernsteinN. The coordination and regulations of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1967.
29.
UllrichBBrüggemannG-P. Moment-knee angle relation in well trained athletes. Int J Sports Med2008; 29(8): 639–645.
30.
BlanksbyBNicholsonLElliottBC. Biomechanical analysis of the grab, track and handle swimming starts: an intervention study. Sport Biomech2002; 1(1): 11–24.
31.
McNitt-GrayJLRequejoPSCostaK. Landing success rate during the artistic gymnastics competition of the 2000 Olympic Games: implications for improved gymnast/mat interaction. Retrieved (2001), 8(6).
32.
SidawayBMcNitt-GrayJLDavisG. Visual timing of muscle preactivation in preparation for landing. Ecol Psychol1989; 1(3): 253–264.
33.
McNitt-GrayJL. Landing strategy adjustments made by female gymnasts in response to drop height and mat composition. J Appl Biomech1993; 9: 173–190.
34.
McNitt-GrayJL. Kinematics and impulse characteristics of drop landings from three heights. Int J Sport Biomech1991; 7: 201–224.
35.
McNitt-GrayJL. Kinetics of the lower extremities during drop landings from three heights. J Biomech1993; 26(9): 1037–1046.
36.
McNitt-GrayJLHesterDMMathiyakomW. Mechanical demand and multijoint control during landing depend on orientation of the body segments relative to the reaction force. J Biomech2001; 34(11): 1471–1482.
37.
McNitt-GrayJL. Subject specific coordination of two- and one-joint muscles during landings suggests multiple control criteria. Motor Control2000; 4: 84–88.
38.
RequejoPSMcNitt-GrayJLFlashnerH. An approach for developing an experimentally based model for simulating flight-phase dynamics. Biol Cybern2002; 87(4): 289–300.
39.
RequejoPSMcNitt-GrayJLFlashnerH. Modification of landing conditions at contact via flight. Biol Cybern2004; 90(5): 327–336.
40.
McNitt-GrayJLMunkasyBAMathiyakomW. Asymmetrical loading of lead and lag legs during landings of blocking movements. Volleyball USA1998; 26: 14–16.
41.
MeroALutanenPKomiPV. A biomechanical study of the sprint start. Scand J Sport Sci1983; 5(1): 20–28.
42.
MeroA. Force-time characteristics and running velocity of male sprinters during the acceleration phase of sprinting. Res Q Exercise Sport1988; 59(2): 94–98.
43.
MeroAKomiPV. Reaction time and electromyographic activity during a sprint start. Eur J Appl Physiol O1990; 61(1–2): 73–80.
44.
BobbertMFVan ZandwijkJP. Dynamics of force and muscle stimulation in human vertical jumping. Med Sci Sport Exer1999; 31(2): 303–310.
45.
ZatsiorskyVMSeluyanovV. Mass and inertia characteristics of the main segments of the human body. In: MatsuiHKobayashiK (eds) Biomechanics VIII-B: proceedings of the eighth international congress of Biomechanics, Nagoya, Japan. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1983, pp.1152–1159.
46.
De LevaP. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J Biomech1996; 29(9): 1223–1230.
47.
De LucaC. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech1997; 13: 135–163.
48.
ElftmanH. The function of muscles in locomotion. Am J Physiol1939; 125: 357–366.
49.
WilcoxRCostaK. Quantile regression: on inferences about the slopes corresponding to one, two or three quantiles. J Mod Appl Stat Meth2009; 8(1): 2–9.
50.
YeadonMRChallisJH. The future of performance-related sports biomechanics research. J Sport Sci1994; 12(1): 3–32.
51.
ReinkensmeyerDJBonatoPBoningerML. Major trends in mobility technology research and development: overview of the results of the NSF-WTEC European study. J Neuroeng Rehabil2012; 9(1): 22.
