This article presents some of the results of a year-long project in the Republic of Ireland to review the quality of the hospital inpatient enquiry data for its use in activity-based funding (ABF). This is the first of two papers regarding best practice in the management of clinical coding services.
Methods:
Four methods were used to address this aspect of the project, namely a literature review, a workshop, an assessment of the coding services in 12 Irish hospitals by structured interviews of the clinical coding managers, and a medical record audit of the clinical codes in 10 hospitals.
Results:
The results included here are those relating to the quality of the medical records, coding work allocation and supervision processes, data quality control measures, communication with clinicians, and the visibility of clinical coders, their managers, and the coding service.
Conclusion:
The project found instances of best practice in the study hospitals but also found several areas needing improvement. These included improving the structure and content of the medical record, clinician engagement with the clinical coding teams and the ABF process, and the use of data quality control measures.
BalnaveLMReidB (2007) Mature use of Casemix—are we there yet?Australian Health Review1(S1): S59–S67.
2.
BerryJAisbettCAisbettJ. (2011) Health Information Classification Quality Evaluation and Analysis. Report to the Health Service Executive, Republic of Ireland. Kirribilli: Pavilion Health.
3.
BramleyMReidB (2005a) Clinical coder training initiatives in republic of Ireland. Health Information Management Journal34(2): 40–46.
4.
BramleyMReidB (2005b) Morbidity data quality initiatives in republic of Ireland. Health Information Management Journal34(2): 47–53.
5.
ChengPGilchristARobinsonKM. (2009) The risk and consequences of clinical miscoding due to inadequate medical documentation: a case study of the impact on health services funding. Health Information Management Journal38(1): 35–46.
6.
CooperriderDLSrivastvaS (1987) Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In: PasmoreWWoodmanR (eds.) Research in Organization Change and Development Vol 1. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 129–169.
7.
GentulMKDavisNA (2011) Structure and organization of the coding function. In: SchraffenbergerLAKuehnL (eds) Effective Management of Coding Services, 4th ed. Chicago: AHIMA, pp. 3–51.
Healthcare Pricing Office (2015) Survey of Coding Managers (Internal Document). Dublin, Republic of Ireland: Healthcare Pricing Office.
11.
LamMInnesKSaadP. (2008) An evaluation of the quality of obstetric/morbidity coding using an objective assessment tool: performance indicators for coding quality (PICQ®)Health Information Management Journal37(2): 19–29.
12.
MairN (2016) Queensland’s approach to clinical coder upskilling. HIM Interchange6(1): 22–24.
13.
McKenzieKWalkerSDixon-LeeC. (2004) Clinical Coding Internationally: A Comparison of the Coding Workforce in Australia, America, Canada and England. Washington: International Federation of Health Records Congress (IFHRO) Congress & AHIMA Convention.
14.
MurphyD (2010a) Coding in republic of Ireland: time for recognition. Health Information Management Journal39(3): 42–46.
15.
MurphyD (2010b) Establishing the feasibility of accreditation of clinical coder training in republic of Ireland through action research. Master’s Thesis, Trinity College University of Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
16.
O’DonovanC (2016) ABF Monthly Reporting using Qlikview. Available at: www.hpo.ie (accessed 29 November 2016).
17.
Pavilion Health (2016) National Audit of Admitted Patient Information in Irish Acute Hospitals: National Level Report. Available at: www.hpo.ie (see HIPE &NPRS Reports) (accessed 29 November 2016).
18.
PriceERobinsonK (2011) The coding masterpiece: a framework for the formal pathways and processes of health classification. Health Information Management Journal40(1): 14–20.
19.
ReidB (2013) Casemix systems and their applications. In: HovengaEJSGrainH (eds) Health Information Governance in a Digital Environment, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Volume 193. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV, pp 316–331.
20.
ReidBCooteGAO’ConnorP. (2011) Coded data quality for casemix payment: insights from two external audits. In: 27th PCSI Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Canada. 19–22 October 2011. Montreal: PCSI.
21.
ReidBRidouttLO’ConnorP. (2017) Best practice in the management of clinical coding services: insights from a project in the Republic of Ireland, Part 2. Health Information Management Journal. DOI:10.1177/1833358317697470
22.
RichardsJBrownAHomanC (2001) The data quality study of the Canadian discharge abstract database. In: Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2001. Available at: http://academic.research.microsoft.com/paper/14196372 (accessed 15 September 2015).
23.
SantosSMurphyGBaxterK. (2008) Organisational factors affecting the quality of hospital clinical coding. Health Information Management Journal37(1): 25–37.
SikoraI (2016) Running the Checker. Available at: www.hpo.ie (accessed 29 November 2016).
28.
SoLBeckCABrienS. (2010) Chart documentation quality and its relationship to the validity of administrative data discharge records. Health Informatics Journal16(2): 101–113.
UzkuraitisCHastingsKTorneyB (2010) Casemix funding optimisation; working together to make the most of every episode. Health Information Management Journal39(3): 47–49.
