This study examined the prediction of academic self-concept (English and Mathematics) and learning strategies (deep and surface), and their direction of effect, on academic achievement (English and Mathematics) of 8,354 students from 16 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Two competing models were tested to ascertain the direction of effect: Model A posited the effect of academic self-concept on learning strategies, whereas Model B posited the effect of learning strategies on academic self-concept. Structural equation modeling indicated that the data fit both models adequately, although Model B was found to have more applied heuristic value for practitioners than Model A because intervention is easier for learning strategies than self-concept. Further investigation also supported the reciprocal relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement. The findings suggest that academic self-concept, learning strategies, and academic achievement have reciprocal relationships with each other.
BentlerP. M. (1983). Some contributions to efficient statistics in structural models: Specification and estimation of moment structures. Psychometrika, 48, 493-517.
2.
BiggsJ. B. (1987). The Learning Process Questionnaire (LPQ): Manual. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
3.
BollenK. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
4.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
6.
ByrneB. M. (1988). The Self Description Questionnaire III: Testing for equivalent factorial validity across ability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 397-406.
7.
ChanK. W.LaiP. Y.LeungM. T.MooreP. J. (2005). Students’ goal orientations, study strategies and achievement: A closer look in Hong Kong Chinese cultural context. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 14, 1-26.
8.
ChristieE.MacMullinC. (1998). What do children worry about?Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 8, 9-24.
9.
CovingtonM. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
10.
CravenR. G.MarshH. W.BurnettP. C. (2003). Cracking the self-concept enhancement conundrum: A call and blueprint for the next generation of self-concept enhancement research. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 91-126). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
11.
DickhäuserO.ReuterM.HillingC. (2005). Coursework selection: A frame of reference approach using structural equation modeling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 673-688.
12.
GuayF.MarshH. W.BoivinM. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 124-136.
13.
HairJ. H.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
HuiE. K. P. (2001). Hong Kong students’ and teachers’ beliefs on students’ concerns and their causal explanation. Educational Research, 43, 279-294.
15.
KemberD.BiggsJ.LeungD. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261-279.
16.
KemberD.LeungD. Y. P. (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 395-407.
17.
KemberD.WatkinsD. (2010). Approaches to learning and teaching by the Chinese. In BondM. H. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 169-185). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
KongL. S. Y.WestwoodP.YuenM. T. (2006). School-related worries of adolescents in Hong Kong: A single school study. Hong Kong Special Education Forum, 8, 21-41.
19.
LauD. C. H.MokM. M. C.YanZ. (2009, November). An assessment scale for measuring primary and secondary Mathematics achievement. Paper presented at the International Conference on Primary Education 2009, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong.
20.
LeeA. Y. P. (2009, October). The English Language Ability Calibrated (ELAC) Scale. Paper presented to DSEJ, Macao Government, Macao.
21.
LeeS. (2007). Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
22.
LoL. N. K.TsangW. K.ChungY. P.ChengY. C.SzeP. M. M.HoE. S. C.HoM. K. (1997). A survey of the effectiveness of Hong Kong secondary school systems. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
23.
LoehlinJ. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
MacCallumR. C.WegenerD. T.UchinoB.FabrigarL. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199.
25.
MarshH. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172.
26.
MarshH. W. (1992). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. New South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
27.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In PhyeG. (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131-198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163.
29.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (2003). International advances in self research: Speaking to the future. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 3-14). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
30.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (2005). Introduction. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 2, pp. 3-13). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
31.
MarshH. W.HauK. T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal-external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 56-67.
32.
MarshH. W.KollerO.BaumertJ. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321-350.
33.
MarshH. W.O’NeillR. (1984). Self Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174.
34.
MarshH. W.WalkerR.DebusR. (1991). Subject specific components of academic self-concept and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 331-345.
35.
McInerneyD. M.MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2008). Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), Advances in self research (Vol. 3, pp. 3-11). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
36.
MöllerJ.StreblowL.PohlmannB.KollerO. (2006). An extension to the internal/external frame of reference model to two verbal and numerical domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 467-487.
37.
MuthénB. O.MuthénL. K. (1998-2011). Mplus 6.12 [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
38.
O’MaraA. J.MarshH. W.CravenR. G.DebusR. L. (2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41, 181-206.
39.
PintrichP. R.MarxR. W.BoyleR. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
40.
SeatonM.MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability and moderation—Two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 390-433.
41.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
42.
SkaalvikE. M.SkaalvikS. (2002). Internal and external frames of reference for academic self-concept. Educational Psychologist, 37, 233-244.
43.
WatkinsD.McInerneyD. M.AkandeA.LeeC. (2003). An investigation of ethnic differences in the motivation and strategies for learning of students in desegregated South African schools. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 189-194.
44.
WatkinsD.McInerneyD. M.LeeC.AkandeA.RegmiM. (2002). Motivation and learning strategies: A cross-cultural perspective. In McInerneyD. M.Van EttenS. (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 329-343). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
45.
WillimsJ. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Paris, France: OECD.
46.
WongN. Y.LinW. Y.WatkinsD. (1996). Cross-cultural validation of models of approaches to learning: An application of confirmatory factor analysis. Educational Psychology, 16, 317-327.
