A Retrospective Evaluation of the Impact of the Planetree Patient-Centered Model of Care on Inpatient Quality Outcomes

Abstract

Objective:

This retrospective quasi-experimental study evaluated the Planetree patient-centered model of care on inpatient quality outcomes. The research questions to be addressed were: What is the impact of the Planetree patient-centered model of care (1) on patient satisfaction, (2) on clinical outcomes (length of stay and readmission), and (3) on the cost of providing care (cost per case and productive nursing hours per patient day)?

Background:

Patients and their families have described a more patient-centered approach as key to meeting their needs. The Planetree model of care provides a framework and operational guidance on how to implement programs targeting these key areas. The link between patient-centered care and quality outcomes such as patient satisfaction, length of stay, readmission, cost per case, and productive nursing hours per patient day has been postulated; however, to date little to no research has been conducted examining this issue.

Methods:

This was a retrospective, nonexperimental comparison study evaluating units with the same types of patients and the same skill mix, and with standardized organizational pay rates, supply costs, policies, procedures, contracts, and a regulatory compliance program. This provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the impact on inpatient quality outcomes of the Planetree patient-centered model of care as practiced in the Planetree unit. Data were analyzed using a 2 × 5 analysis of variance (ANOVA) and logistic regression (readmission only). This was a study of five separate cohorts grouped by calendar year rather than a study of repeated measures.

Results:

No differences in demographic profiles were noted between the two groups. The patient satisfaction composite mean score evaluation, length-of-stay evaluation, and the cost-per-case evaluation demonstrated that the Planetree group was different from the comparison group (p = <.05 with Eta squared = >.01). This evidence validates that the Planetree patient-centered model of care had a positive impact on patient satisfaction, length of stay, and cost per case.

Conclusions:

This evaluation of 869 hospitalized adults undergoing elective total-knee or total-hip joint replacement surgery indicated that the Planetree patient-centered model of care positively affected patient satisfaction, length of stay, and cost per case. Nursing and hospital administrators seeking to improve the inpatient hospital experience should consider implementation of the Planetree patient-centered model of care. Hospitals and healthcare organizations seeking an evidence-based approach to the implementation of patientcentered care will benefit from the information in this study.

Keywords

Planetree healthcare design patient-centered care quality outcomes healthcare administration patient satisfaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2006). CAHPS hospital survey chartbook: What patients say about their experiences with hospital care. In National CAHPS Benchmarking Database (AHRQ Pub. No. 06–0049). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2006). Medicare program: Hospital outpatient prospective payment system and calendar year 2007 payment rates. In Federal Register (Vol. 71, No. 266). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Cleary

Edgman-Levitain

Roberts

Moloney

McMullen

Walker

(1991). Patients evaluate their hospital care: A national survey. Health Affairs, 10, 254–267.

Committee on Quality Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new Health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Covinsky

Rosenthal

Chren

Justice

Fortinsky

Palmer

(1998). The relation between health status changes and patient satisfaction in older hospitalized medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13, 223–229.

Davies

, & Cleary

(2005). Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 428–342.

Finkelstein

Singh

Silvers

Neuhauser

, & Rosenthal

(1998). Patient and hospital characteristics associated with patient assessments of hospital obstetrical care. Medical Care, 36, AS68–AS78.

Frampton

Gilpin

, & Charmel

(Eds.). (2003). Putting patients first: Designing and practicing patient centered care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gerteis

Edgman-Levitan

Daley

, & Delbanco

(Eds.). (1993). Through the patient's eyes: Understanding and promoting patient-centered care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Gesell

, & Wolosin

(2004). Inpatients' ratings of care in 5 common clinical conditions. Quality Management in Health Care, 13(4), 222–227.

11.

Hall

, & Dorman

(1990). Patient socio-demographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: A meta-analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 811–818.

12.

Hargraves

Wilson

Zaslavsky

Walker

Rogers

, & Cleary

(2001). Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Medical Care, 39(6), 635–641.

13.

The Joint Commission. (2006, December). Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: The official handbook. (Available from Joint Commission Resources, http://www.jcrinc.com/13519/)

14.

Kane

Maciejewski

, & Finch

(1997). The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes. Medical Care, 35, 714–730.

15.

Press

(2002). Patient satisfaction: Defining, measuring, and improving the experience of care. Chicago: Health Administration Press.

16.

Tasa

Baker

, & Murray

(1996). Using patient feedback for quality improvement. Quality Management in Health Care, 4, 55–67.

17.

Wunderlich

, & Kohler

(2001). Improving the quality of long-term care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.