Kantorski examined string education doctoral research between 1935 and 1992 and highlighted potential future areas of research. In this content analysis, I examined dissertations in string education between 1992 and 2022 to determine current trends of doctoral research. I reviewed 393 string education dissertations and coded each to determine the methodology, the content categories, the participants, and the specific instrument(s) the researchers examined. Results indicate that doctoral string education research increased between 1992 and 2022. Historical (n = 190, 24.55%) and descriptive (n = 171, 22.09%) research methods were used most frequently. Among the seven main content categories, dissertation authors most frequently examined instructional materials (n = 170, 21.96%) and historical and biographical topics (n = 133, 17.18%). The teacher (n = 66, 8.53%) and the style and genre (n = 49, 6.33%) categories were least frequently studied. I found that DMA candidates examined instructional materials (16.02%) most frequently while PhD candidates examined students (8.53%) most frequently thus highlighting the differing priorities of performers and educators. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
CavittM. E. (2006). A content analysis of doctoral research in beginning band education, 1958–2004. Journal of Band Research, 42(1), 42–58.
3.
ChangA. C.AmmermanA. (2020). String teacher preparation programs in the United States. String Research Journal, 10(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948499220926175
4.
DabczynskiA. (2020, March4–7). Your string teaching DNA: Suzuki, Rolland & those old method books [Conference session]. American String Teacher Association, Orlando, FL, United States.
5.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2005). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
GillespieR. (1991). Research in string pedagogy for developing the playing skills of students in string classes. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 15(1), 32–46.
8.
GillespieR.HamannD. L. (1998). The status of orchestra programs in the public schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345761
9.
GillespieR.HamannD. L. (2010). An investigation of new string programs established in American schools between 1999 and 2009. String Research Journal, 1(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/194849921000100102
10.
GillespieR.RussellJ. A.HamannD. L. (2014). String music educators’ perceptions of the impact of new string programs on student outcomes, school music programs, and communities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414531987
11.
GrieserD. R. (2014). String specialists’ and non-string specialists’ content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge of string-specific techniques in the intermediate strings class (Publication no. 1676446569) [Doctoral dissertation, Boston University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
12.
GrieserD. R.HendricksK. S. (2018). Review of literature: Pedagogical content knowledge and string teacher preparation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318760970
13.
HudsonM. W.SilveiraJ. M. (2020). A content analysis of the Journal of Band Research: 1964–2016. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 224, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.224.0061
14.
KantorskiV. J. (1995). A content analysis of doctoral research in string education, 1936–1992. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(4), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345728
15.
KantorskiV. J.StegmanS. F. (2006). A content analysis of qualitative research dissertations in music education, 1998–2002. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 168, 63–73. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/40319461
16.
MillicanJ. S. (2013). Describing instrumental music teachers’ thinking: Implications for understanding pedagogical content knowledge. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123312473761
PriceH. E.OrmanE. K. (1999). MENC national conferences 1984–1998: A content analysis. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 18(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512339901800105
23.
PriceH. E.OrmanE. K. (2001). MENC 2000 national biennial in-service conference: A content analysis. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345708
24.
SckippA. M. (2010). Perspectives of non-string specialists in the field of string orchestra education: A case study of Suffolk County, Long Island (Publication no. 756454978) [Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
SilveiraJ. M.DiazF. M. (2014). Student teaching in music: A content analysis of research journals in music education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 23(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713487215
27.
SilveyB. A.SimsW. L.PohlmanG.RegierB. J. (2019). A content analysis of Update: Applications of Research in Music Education (1989–2017). Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 38(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123319829193
28.
SmithB. P.MickJ. P.AlexanderM. L. (2018). The status of strings and orchestra programs in U.S. schools. String Research Journal, 8(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948499218769607
SpringerD. G. (2020). Students’ perspectives on the master’s degree in music education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 30(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083720951447
YarbroughC. (1984). A content analysis of the Journal of Research in Music Education, 1953–1983. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(4), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344920
34.
YarbroughC. (2002). The first 50 years of the Journal of Research in Music Education: A content analysis. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(4), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345354
35.
ZabanalJ. R. A. (2021). An examination of orchestras and repertoire performed at the Midwest clinic from 1990 through 2019. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 39(3), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123320978776
36.
ZabanalJ. R. A. (2022). An examination of orchestras and repertoire performed at the American String Teachers Association’s national orchestra festival (2004–2020). String Research Journal, 12(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/19484992221094817
37.
ZabanalJ. R. A.ChangA. C.LofdahlH. A. (2022). A content analysis of the American String Teacher (2000–2019). String Research Journal, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948499222112175
