Soft power at home and abroad: Sport diplomacy,politics and peace-building

Abstract

Soft power is the power to persuade whereby one actor in a non-coercive manner convinces another to want the same things he/she wants. Sport can be used as tool of soft power both internationally and domestically. Peace-building and nation-building can be achieved through four mechanisms of sport diplomacy and politics: image-building; building a platform for dialogue; trust-building; and reconciliation, integration and anti-racism. These mechanisms are not deterministically controllable and can have unintended consequences. On the one hand, sporting events can be used as a means of building trust between adversaries. On the other, the hostilities between peoples can be mirrored on playing fields. This article examines the intended and unintended consequences of each mechanism. It also examines the role of confounding economic factors. Each article comprising this Special Issue explores a different mechanism of sport politics and public diplomacy.

Keywords

Anti-racism causal mechanisms image-building integration peace-building platform for dialogue reconciliation soft power sport diplomacy trust-building

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alegi

(2008) “A nation to be reckoned with”: The politics of World Cup stadium construction in Cape Town and Durban, South Africa. African Studies 67(3): 397–422.

Baldwin

(1979) Power analysis and world politics. World Politics 31(2): 161–194.

Baldwin

(1985) Economic Statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bennett

(2013) Causal mechanisms and typological theories in the study of civil conflict. In: Checkel

(ed.) Transnational Dynamics of Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–230.

Caruso

di Domizio

(2013) International hostility and aggressiveness on the soccer pitch: Evidence from European Championships and World Cups for the period 2000–2012. International Area Studies Review 16(3).

Checkel

(2013) Transnational Dynamics of Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elster

(2007) Explaining Social Behavior. More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gates

(2008) Mixing it up: The role of theory in mixed methods research. Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association, Section for Qualitative and Multi-Methods Research 6(1): 27–29.

Grix

(2013) Sport politics and the Olympics. Political Studies Review 11(1): 15–25.

10.

Guthrie-Shimizu

(2013) Japan’s sport diplomacy in the early post-Second World War years. International Area Studies Review 16(3).

11.

Hasselgård

Straume

(2012) Norway Cup er lek—bistand er alvor. [Norway Cup is a game—but foreign aid is serious.] Dagsavisen, 27 July 2012. Available at: http://www.dagsavisen.no/nyemeninger/alle_meninger/cat1001/subcat1034/thread250692/#post_250692

12.

Jackson

(2013) The contested terrain of sport diplomacy in a globalizing world. International Area Studies Review 16(3).

13.

Jung

(2013) Sport as a catalyst for cooperation: Why sport dialogue between the two Koreas succeeds in some cases but not in others. International Area Studies Review 16(3).

14.

Ndlovu

(2013) FIFA and the South Africa question: The 1976/1977 football unity talks and their impact on the development of professional football in South Africa. International Area Studies Review 16(3).

15.

Nye

Jr (1990) Bound to Lead. The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.

16.

Nye

Jr (2004) Soft Power. The Means of Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

17.

Organski

AFK

(1968) World Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

18.

Rhamey

Early

(2013) Going for the gold: Status-seeking behavior and Olympic performance. International Area Studies Review 16(3).