Annual Report Readability and Agency Cost: The Influence of Firm Size

Abstract

This study examines whether the impact of annual report readability on agency cost varies with firm size among listed Indian non-financial firms. For this study, we have selected two cross-sectional samples comprising 360 non-financial firms listed on National Stock Exchange (NSE)—divided into 183 small firms and 177 large firms—for the financial year 2019–2020 and 2020–2021. The classification between large and small firms is drawn based on the respective quartile values of total assets and market capitalization taken together. The proxy for agency cost is the natural logarithm of selling and distribution expenses. We have developed an index using the count of characters, words, lines, and pages of the annual report to measure readability. To investigate the association between the annual report readability, agency cost, and firm size, we use the OLS methodology. In our model, we control for fixed assets, leverage, ownership concentration, institutional ownership, the board size, and board independence. Our findings reflect an inverse relationship between readability and agency cost. Additionally, we find that the effect of annual report readability on agency cost is higher for large firms than for smaller firms. We further checked our findings’ robustness using a logistic regression model and found similar results.

Keywords

Readability annual report agency costs firm size Indian firms

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bathala

C. T.

, & Rao

R. P.

(1995). The determinants of board composition: An agency theory perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics , 16(1), 59–69.

Bloomfield

R. J.

(2002). The incomplete revelation hypothesis and financial reporting. Accounting Horizons , 16(3), 233–243.

Courtis

J. K.

(1995). Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal , 8(2), 4–17.

Dale

, & Chall

J. S.

(1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin , 27(1), 11–28.

Dalton

D. R.

, & Dalton

C. M.

(2011). Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and firm performance. Journal of Management , 37(2), 404–411.

Dalwai

, Chinnasamy

, & Mohammadi

(2021). Annual report readability, agency costs, firm performance: An investigation of Oman’s financial sector. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies , 11(2), 247–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-06-2020-0142

Farvaque

, Refait-Alexandre

, & Saidane

(2011). Corporate disclosure: A review of its (direct and indirect) benefits and costs. International Economics , 128(4), 5–31.

Flesch

(1974). The art of readable writing . Harper and Row.

Gunning

(1968). The technique of clear writing . McGraw-Hill.

10.

Habib

, & Hasan

M. M.

(2018). Business strategies and annual report readability. Accounting & Finance , 60(3), 2513–2547.

11.

Hassan

M. K.

, Abbas

B. A.

, & Garas

S. N.

(2019). Readability, governance and performance: A test of the obfuscation hypothesis in Qatari listed firms. Corporate Governance , 19(2), 270–298.

12.

Healy

P. M.

, & Palepu

K. G.

(2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 31(1–3), 405–440.

13.

Holder-Webb

, Cohen

, Nath

, & Wood

(2008). A survey of governance disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics , 83(3), 543–563.

14.

Islam

M. S.

(2018). Corporate governance and readability of annual reports. In Farazmand

(Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 1–6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3342-2

15.

Jensen

M. C.

, & Meckling

W. H.

(1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics , 3(4), 305–360.

16.

Kim

, Kim

, Mantecon

, & Song

K. R.

(2019). Short-term institutional investors and agency costs of debt. Journal of Business Research , 95, 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.019

17.

Lang

, & Stice-Lawrence

(2015). Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 60(2–3), 110–135.

18.

(2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 45(2–3), 221–247.

19.

Lim

E. K.

, Chalmers

, & Hanlon

(2018). The influence of business strategy on annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy , 37(1), 65–81.

20.

Lipton

, & Lorsch

J. W.

(1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer , 48(1), 59–77.

21.

, Ramos

, & Rogo

(2017). Earnings management and annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 63(1), 1–25.

22.

Lundholm

R. J.

, Rogo

, & Zhang

J. L.

(2014). Restoring the Tower of Babel: How foreign firms communicate with U.S. investors. The Accounting Review , 89(4), 1453–1485.

23.

Luo

, Li

, & Chen

(2018). Annual report readability and corporate agency costs. China Journal of Accounting Research , 11(3), 87–212.

24.

Nguyen

A. H.

, Doan

D. T.

, & Nguyen

L. H.

(2020). Corporate governance and agency cost: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Risk Financial Management , 13(5), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13050103

25.

OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide . OECD Publishing.

26.

Pashalian

, & Crissy

W. J. E.

(1950). How readable are corporate annual reports? Journal of Applied Psychology , 34(4), 244–248.

27.

Rashid

(2015). Revisiting agency theory: Evidence of board independence and agency cost from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics , 130(1), 181–198.

28.

Richards

, & Staden

C. V.

(2015). The readability impact of international financial reporting standards. Pacific Accounting Review , 27(3), 282–303.

29.

Soper

F. J.

, & Dolphin

(1964). Readability and corporate annual reports. The Accounting Review , 39(2), 358–362.

30.

Subramanian

, Insley

R. G.

, & Blackwell

R. D.

(1993). Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations. Journal of Business Communication , 30(1), 49–61.

31.

Zakaria

, Purhanudin

, Pin

C. T.

, & Soon

W. C. K.

(2016). Leverage and agency cost: Malaysian construction listed companies. International Journal of Management Research & Review , 6(12), 1654–1660.

32.

Zurel

(2014). Readability of annual reports: A comparison of American and French annual reports . https://libstore.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/162/189/RUG01-002162189_2014_0001_AC.pdf