Graduate Students and Field Experience: Aligning Curricular Goals With Multiple Measures of Assessment

Abstract

Field placements in teacher candidate preparation have long been established as significant and formative for learners. Teacher educators attempt to align course goals with fieldwork and then assess candidate progress. This authentic practice has been highly valued for preservice candidates. For educators in the United States, providing an authentic experience for part-time graduate students has become a challenge. This article examines the use of a Saturday instructional experience with course goals, authentic instruction, and multiple measures of assessment. Linked to the experiences are the multiple forms of assessment that are used for candidates and the students with whom they work. In this setting a group of students from a lower socioeconomic background and distressed school district are employed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astin

A. W.

(1997). Liberal education and democracy: The case for pragmatism. In Orrill

(Ed.), Education and democracy: Re-imagining liberal learning in America (p. 210-211). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

Benson

Harkavy

(2000). Integrating the American system of higher, secondary and primary education to develop civic responsibility. In Ehrlich

(Ed.), Civic responsibility higher education (pp. 174-196). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.

Battistoni

(1997). Service learning and democratic citizenship. Theory into practice, 36, 150-156.

Boyle

H.C.

Kari

N. N.

(2002). Renewing the democratic spirit in American colleges and universities: Higher education as public work. In Civic responsibility and higher education, 37. (T. Ehrlich, ed) Phoenix: Oryx Press

Brisbin

R. A.

Hunter

(2003). community leaders' perceptions of the university and college efforts to encourage civic engagement. The review of higher education, 24,4 467-486.

Brooks

J. G.

Brooks

M. G.

(1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Brophy

(Ed). (2002). Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints. New York: Elseviercience Ltd.

Bruner

(1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press.

Bruner

(1973). Going beyond the information given. In Arglin

J. M.

(Ed.), Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing (pp. 218-238). New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

10.

Bruner

(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press.

11.

Bruner

(1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press.

12.

Bruner

(1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press.

13.

Harkavy

(2004). New perspectives in service learning: Research to advance the field. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

14.

Hopkins

(1985). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Philadelphia: Open University Press

15.

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium . (1993). A model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief School Officers.

16.

Matthews

Smith

B. L.

, MacGregor

Gabelnick

(1996). Creating learning communities. Civic responsibility and higher education.

17.

National Council for the Social Studies . (2000). Curriculum standards for social studies: Expectations for excellence. Silver Spring, Maryland: NCSS.

18.

Sunal

C.S.

Hass

M. E.

, (2005). Social studies for the elementary and middle grades: A constructivist approach. (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

19.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press

20.

Vygotsky

Lev

(1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.