We use a mixed methods approach to explore why some girls drop out of secondary school despite conditional cash transfers (CCTs), using quantitative and qualitative data collected during the Odisha Girls Incentive Programme, a CCT pilot in India. We estimate a quantitative discrete choice model in the first phase to identify factors that separate dropouts from non-dropouts. In the qualitative phase, we control for those factors by careful choice of case studies and conduct a ceteris paribus analysis. After accounting for socio-economic differences, we find that the girls’ agency, albeit ‘thin’ as in Klocker (2007), is crucial and may often prove to be the tipping point in enrolment decisions. This has policy implications vis-à-vis counselling strategies for dropout mitigation.
BairdS.FerreiraF.H.ÖzlerB.WoolcockM. (2013). Relative effectiveness of conditional and unconditional cash transfers for schooling outcomes in developing countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(8), 1–124.
2.
CaracelliV.J.GreeneJ.C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 195–207.
CreswellJ.W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
5.
DrèzeJ.KingdonG.G. (2001). School participation in rural India. Review of Development Economics, 5(1), 1–24.
6.
FilmerD.PritchettL.H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.
7.
Govt. of Odisha. (2015). Odisha Economic Survey 2014–15. Bhubaneswar: Planning and Coordination Department, Govt. of Odisha.
8.
IvankovaN.V.StickS.L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93–135.
9.
Johnson-HanksJ. (2005). Uncertainty and intentional action in contemporary Cameroon. Current Anthropology, 46(3), 363–384.
10.
KabeerN. (2012). Women’s economic empowerment and inclusive growth: Labour markets and enterprise development. New Delhi: International Development Research Centre.
11.
KarJ.KarJ. (2002). Educational deprivation of girls in Orissa. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 8(4), 116–143.
12.
KlockerN. (2007). An example of ‘thin’ agency: Child domestic workers in Tanzania. In PanelliR.PunchS.RobsonE. (Eds), Global perspectives on rural childhood and youth: Young rural lives (pp. 83–94). New York: Routledge.
13.
MishraL. (2015). Enrolment of tribal girls in secondary schools of Odisha. International Journal of Education, 3(2), 1–10.
14.
MontenegroC.E.PatrinosH.A. (2014). Comparable estimates of returns to schooling around the world (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7020). Washington, DC: World Bank.
15.
Murphy-GrahamE.LealG. (2014). Child marriage, agency, and schooling in rural Honduras (UC Berkley Working Paper No. 35). Berkeley, California: Center for Latin American Studies Publications.
PetrosinoA. (2012). Interventions in developing nations for improving primary and secondary school enrollment of children: A systematic review. (3ie Systematic Review No. 3). London: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
18.
SaavedraJ.E.GarciaS. (2012). Impacts of conditional cash transfer programs on educational outcomes in developing countries: A meta-analysis (Working Paper Series No. WR-921-1). California: RAND Labor and Population
19.
SenguptaP.GuhaJ. (2002). Enrolment, dropout and grade completion of girl children in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(17), 1621–1637.
20.
SiddhuG. (2011). Who makes it to secondary school? Determinants of transition to secondary schools in rural India. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(4), 394–401.
21.
SharpJ.L.MobleyC.HammondC.WithingtonC.DrewS.StringfieldS.StipanovicN. (2011). A mixed methods sampling methodology for a multisite case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 34–54.
22.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3–50). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
23.
TeddlieC.YuF. (2007). Mixed methods sampling a typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.
24.
van der SteegM.van ElkR.WebbinkD. (2015). Does intensive coaching reduce school dropout? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Economics of Education Review, 48, 184–197. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.07.006
