Public Heritage Communication on American Indian Wars Sites: Policy Improvement and Remaining Challenges

Abstract

Federal historic preservation is an important way to provide public recognition and to promote heritage that was selected by the government for the nation. The history of (American) Indian policies shows an arduous relationship between the US government and American Indians. In spite of the evolution of federal preservation efforts and the federal government’s public heritage communication, Indian heritage sites still reflect the authoritarian and utilitarian understanding towards the Indian heritage. This research studies the US federal government’s understanding of Indian Wars sites through the analysis of interpretation at the Washita Battlefield National Historic Site, which reveals the historically dual approaches towards Indian heritage conservation and the persistent tendency of limited under-standing for American history in the larger social and political arenas despite policy improvement. American Indian battlefields have been neglected in orthodox preservation considering their insufficient value to qualify for patriotic military history preservation or Indian relics preservation. The analysis of preservation efforts and interpretation of Indian Wars sites indicates the evolution of controlling (American) Indian heritage through policy changes and the assessment of policy implementation.

Keywords

Historic preservation Indian heritage preservation public heritage communication (American) Indian Wars sites preservation national park

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrus

Patrick W.

(1999 [1992]). Guidelines for identifying, evaluating, and registering America’s historic battlefields (National Register Bulletin). Washington, DC: National Park Service.

Barthel

Diane

(1996). Historic preservation: Collective memory and historical identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Bergman

Teresa

(2013). Exhibiting patriotism: Creating and contesting interpretations of American historic sites. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.

Brown

William E.

(1964). Special report on Washita battlefield, Oklahoma. Santa Fe, NM: National Park Service. Retrieved 14 June 2017 , from https://www.nps.gov/nhl/learn/specialstudies/WashitaBattlefield.pdf

Carroll

John M.

(Ed.). (1978). General Custer and the battle of the Washita: The federal view (Custeriana Series). Bryan, TX: Guidon Press.

Craighead

Sarah

. (2002). Civic Engagement with the Community at Washita Battlefield National Historic Site. The George Wright FORUM. 44–49.

Derek

Peter B.

(2014). Historic preservation for designers. New York, NY and London, UK: Fairchild Books.

Epple

Jess C.

(1970). Custer’s battle of the Washita and a history of the Plains Indian tribes. New York, NY: Exposition Press.

Greene

Jerome A.

(2004). Washita, the southern Cheyenne and the U.S. Army (Vol. 3 of Campaigns and Commanders Series). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

10.

Hardorff

Richard G.

(Ed.). (2006). Washita memories: Eyewitness views of Custer’s attack on black Kettle’s village. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

11.

Hedges

Chris

& Sacco

Joe

(2012). Days of destruction, days of revolt. New York, NY: Nation Books.

12.

Hoig

Stan

(1980). The peace chiefs of the Cheyennes. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

13.

Hurt

Duglas A.

(2010). Reinterpreting the Washita Battlefield National Historic Site. The Geographical Review. 100(3), 371–393.

14.

Jameson

Fredric

(1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

15.

Levene

Mark

& Roberts

Penny

. (Eds). (1999). The Massacre in history (Vol. 1 of War and Genocide). New York, NY and Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.

16.

Murtagh

William J.

(Ed.). (2006). Keeping time: The history and theory of preservation in America (3rd ed.). Pittstown, NJ: Main Street Press.

17.

Melson

(1982). Theoretical inquiry into the Armenian massacres of 1894–1896. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 24(3), 482–483.

18.

National Park Service. (2014). Washita battlefield national historic site. Natural Resource Condition Assessment. Retrieved 29 November 2014 , from https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/DownloadFile/488616

19.

Oklahoma Historical Society. (1993). Battle Cry for History. Retrieved 26 June 2016 , from http://www.okhistory.org/about/battlecry

20.

Oklahoma Historical Society. (2009). Battle of the Washita. The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture. Retrieved 29 November 2014 , from www.digitallibrary.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/W/WA037.html

21.

Pollock

Griselda

& Zemans

Joyce

(2007). Museums after modernism: Strategies of engagement. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

22.

Roy

Morris

Jr. . (1992). Sheridan: The Life and Wars of General Phil Sheridan. New York: Crown Publishing.

23.

Ryback

Timothy

(1993, November 15). Evidence of evil. New Yorker. Retrieved 30 April 2017 , from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1993/11/15/evidence-of-evil

24.

Smith

Laurajane

(2006). Uses of heritage. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.

25.

Thompson

Helen

(2015, August 21). Study of holocaust survivors finds trauma passed on to children’s genes. The Guardians. Retrieved 11 May 2017 , from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/21/study-of-holocaust-survivors-finds-trauma-passed-on-to-childrens-genes

26.

Turnbridge

J. E.

& Ashworth

G. J.

(1996). Dissonant heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

27.

van Balgooy

Max. A.

(Ed.). (2015). Interpreting African American history and culture at museums and historic sites. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

28.

Vergo

Peter

(1989). The new museology. London, UK: Reaktion Books.

29.

Watkins

Joe

(2006). The antiquities act at one hundred years: A native American perspective. In Harmon

McManamon

F. P.

& Pitcaithley

D. T.

(Eds), The antiquities act: A century of American archaeology, historic preservation, and nature conservation (pp. 187–198). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.