Abstract
A significant proportion of patients requiring Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) are now considered safe for earlier tracheostomy insertion, allowing for sedation wean and commencement of rehabilitation. Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) clinical swallow assessment usually occurs following tracheostomy cuff deflation, when signs of dysphagia and aspiration are detectable. Cuff deflation can be difficult to establish in patients on ECMO with complex ventilation requirements, with prolonged cuff inflation delaying oral feeding. Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is used routinely in critical care, but application in the ECMO cohort is a new development. FEES offers the potential for earlier accurate swallowing assessment irrespective of cuff status. Safety, utility and outcomes of FEES in cardiothoracic patients with tracheostomies requiring ECMO has not previously been reported. This case series demonstrates the outcomes and benefits of FEES for expediting earlier, safe oral intake in this population.
Introduction
ECMO is a rescue therapy in patients with severe acute respiratory and cardiac failure. A mechanical pump circulates blood from the vascular system, enabling CO2 removal and oxygenation (Makdisi & Wang, 2015). ECMO supports life when ventilation is ineffective, allowing for lung recovery or a bridge to transplantation. Developments in ECMO have occurred since inception (Hill et al., 1972), evident in the CESAR trial (Bartlett et al., 2000; Kolla et al., 1997; Lewandowski et al., 1997; Peek et al., 2009) and from the Influenza A and COVID-19 pandemic experience (Czapran et al., 2020) leading to guidelines (Abrams et al., 2018). Twenty-seven designated ECMO beds are now commissioned across five centres (NHS England, 2019). To date 37,389 patients have undergone ECMO in Europe, with 772 at our dedicated ECMO centre in the Northwest of England (ELSO, 2025).
Tracheostomy is increasingly adopted when requirements for ECMO persist. Studies show that bleeding risks associated with tracheostomy insertion can be managed well (Michael et al., 2020). Whilst practice varies, reports show tracheostomy is performed in 18%–72% of patients (Camporota et al., 2015; Nukiwa et al., 2022), at eight to ten days post-commencement of ECMO (Schmidt et al., 2021). Early tracheostomy decreases airflow resistance and sedation requirement, enabling earlier rehabilitation, and reducing duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay and associated costs (Hosokawa et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2019).
Dysphagia is common in critical care (Armas-Navarro et al., 2023; Freeman-Sanderson et al., 2023; Plowman et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2024; Zuercher et al., 2019) due to intubation trauma, critical illness weakness, prolonged sedation, respiratory compromise, ARDS, cognitive impairment, delirium, reflux, deconditioning, frailty and comorbidities (Brodsky et al., 2017; Hardemark-Cedborg et al., 2015; Ponfick et al., 2015; Zuercher et al., 2020). Consequences are severe including respiratory and nutritional compromise, increased length of stay, mortality and morbidity and worse functional outcome (Macht et al., 2014). National guidelines and research recognise the SLT role in supporting communication, swallowing and tracheostomy weaning in critical care (Bonvento et al., 2017; Intensive Care Society, 2022; Likar et al., 2024; McGrath & Wallace, 2014; Pandian et al., 2023; Wilkinson et al., 2014). Early voice restoration, evaluation of upper airway/laryngeal functions during Above Cuff Vocalisation (ACV) or cuff deflation, and laryngeal and swallow rehabilitation are vital (McGrath et al., 2019; McRae et al., 2020; Wallace & McGrath, 2021). Laryngopharyngeal impairment and aspiration are difficult to determine during tracheostomy cuff inflation due to the absence of audible secretions, cough and voice (Goff & Patterson, 2019). Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is an accurate instrumental tool used routinely in critical care by SLTs with appropriate skills. FEES enables direct visualisation of laryngopharyngeal structures, secretions, sensation, swallow function, and aspiration risk (Ajemian et al., 2001; Ambika et al., 2019; Hafner et al., 2008; Intensive Care Society, 2022; Wallace et al., 2020). FEES also assists in determining dysphagia aetiology, severity and prognosis, and individually tailored treatment (Wallace et al., 2020; Dziewas et al., 2016, American Speech-Hearing Association, 2025). Appropriateness and selection criteria for FEES is based on clinical judgement of adequate level of alertness, aspiration concerns on initial SLT clinical assessment and national policy (Wallace et al., 2020).
Use of FEES in ECMO patients has been hindered by concerns regarding bleeding risks of nasendoscopy, patient fragility and lack of SLT resource. However, FEES is potentially very beneficial for early dysphagia detection, guiding swallowing rehabilitation, preventing aspiration complications and oral feeding delays, in particular when tracheostomy weaning is protracted. This case series describes FEES outcomes for four patients receiving ECMO at our centre. The TiDier checklist is applicable to each case;
Case 1
FEES Outcomes
Timeline of Patients Progress to Oral Intake
Case 2
A forty-four-year-old gentleman was escalated to critical care on day four of hospital admission for severe pneumonitis. Previous medical history included HIV, asthma and hypertension. He required intubation, sedation, mechanical ventilation and ECMO due to severe respiratory acidosis and raised PCO2. An adjustable flange size 9 tracheostomy was inserted on day twenty-six and SLT requested. Conscious level was variable, delaying SLT intervention, however once awake, assessment identified absent swallow function. High ventilatory requirements and instability deemed cuff deflation unsafe. SLT intervention supported communication and the cautious introduction of oral trials, sixty-seven days after commencing ECMO. FEES was indicated due to clinical vulnerability, concerns that prolonged intubation impacted laryngeal sensation and the degree of dysphagia severity on assessment. FEES identified weak base of tongue movement, laryngopharyngeal oedema and a resolving posterior glottic intubation granuloma but silent aspiration was ruled out (see Table 1). In this case, FEES enabled rapid progression of oral intake to IDDSI Level 0 thin fluids and IDDSI Level 7 regular diet, despite ongoing severe respiratory compromise, improving both patient mood and nutritional status (see Table 2).
Case 3
A thirty-five-year-old gentleman with Langerhans histiocytosis underwent a double lung transplant with ECMO. A rise in CO2 and ventilatory pressure support prevented ECMO weaning and a decision was made for tracheostomy insertion on day four. Frequent theatre interventions for anastomotic dehiscence, right bronchopleural fistula, and bronchoscopies necessitated prolonged sedation. Forty-two days post transplantation and commencement of ECMO, sedation wean enabled SLT clinical swallow assessment. A breathy dysphonic voice quality indicated potential intubation injury to the larynx and subtle signs of laryngeal penetration on oral trials were suspected; therefore, FEES was recommended. Discussion with the ECMO consultant regarding bleeding risks enabled FEES to continue with heparin and cuff deflation with PMV, following a protracted period of cuff inflation. FEES identified bilateral vocal fold immobility with incomplete glottic closure, sensory-motor dysphagia, with a delayed swallow, reduced pharyngeal constriction and airway penetration of residue on harder textures (see Table 1), a. Sips of IDDSI Level 0 thin fluids and IDDSI Level 4 thick puree were commenced (see Table 2) alongside exercises targeting laryngopharyngeal weakness (effortful swallow and chin tuck against resistance).
Respiratory acidosis, bibasal lung collapse and further anastomotic dehiscence led to a medical decision to change the single lumen tracheostomy to a Rusch double lumen tube; allowing BiPAP ventilation to the left lung, and CPAP valve circuit to the right lung for anastomotic healing. PMV use was paused whilst ventilation was optimised. SLT performed a further FEES to ensure no detriment to swallow function from altered ventilation and tube change. Whilst FEES showed improvement in pharyngeal and swallow strength, laryngopharyngeal sensation and silent aspiration had worsened, likely due to the larger tube size restricting upper airway airflow, and lack of PMV diminishing sensation and subglottic pressure. Oral fluids were no longer safe, but IDDSI Level 4 thick puree continued safely.
PMV use re-commenced and a further FEES identified improved laryngopharyngeal sensation, enabling commencement of IDDSI Level 0 thin fluids and IDDSI Level 6 soft/bite-sized diet, returning to IDDSI Level 7 regular diet one week later.
In this case FEES facilitated accurate monitoring of swallow function during tube changes and turbulent recovery. Safe oral feeding continued despite medical deterioration. Serial FEES was invaluable in preventing aspiration complications and facilitated flexible dysphagia management during critical illness. The huge psychological benefits of early FEES were highlighted by the patient who reported feeling ‘close to depression’ whilst nil-by-mouth and ‘being able to eat and drink was a big step, improvements I could see’.
Case 4
A twenty-nine-year-old female with a new diagnosis of HIV, but no previous medical history, was admitted with pneumocystis pneumonia and cytomegalovirus pneumonia. She required intubation due to failure to thrive on non-invasive ventilation. ECMO was commenced nine days later due to acidosis and hypercapnia. An adjustable flange tracheostomy was inserted fifty-nine days later. Improved alertness facilitated SLT clinical swallow assessment. Lung fibrosis and high ventilation requirements prevented cuff deflation and absence of a subglottic port precluded ACV. Swallow weakness was evident on assessment and, due to SLT workforce availability, FEES was performed five days post tracheostomy during ongoing cuff inflation and heparin. FEES was indicated as the patient was alert and tracheostomy cuff inflation was essential to optimise ventilation.
FEES identified laryngeal erythema and oedema, bilateral vocal cord paresis, severe sensorimotor dysphagia with delayed swallow and pharyngeal residue symptoms. Oedema obliterated the pyriform sinuses, causing silent aspiration of residue overspilling into the airway. As detailed in Table 1, small quantities of IDDSI Level 0 thin fluids were visualised as safe despite cuff inflation, alongside swallow exercises targeting physiological weakness. Discussion with the medical team agreed on deferring the use of steroids for oedema, opting to monitoring whether increased swallow activity from introducing oral intake was effective.
Fourteen days later during a tracheostomy tube change, respiratory function deteriorated requiring re-sedation. Two days later sedation was weaned, ECMO was decannulated, and SLT supported re-commencement of dysphagia exercises, observing increased hyolaryngeal excursion and swallow strength. Repeat FEES was indicated and twenty-eight days after initial FEES found no change in laryngeal oedema but improvement in swallow strength. IDDSI Level 0 thin fluids and IDDSI Level 5 minced/moist diet were safe with cuff inflation. Fourteen days later, clinical swallow assessment during short periods of cuff deflation and PMV confirmed safety of continuing oral intake. Jaw and tongue strengthening exercises supported chewing ultimately enabling return to IDDSI Level 7 regular diet nineteen days later.
In this case FEES supported safe oral feeding with the cuff inflated on ventilation two weeks prior to cuff deflation, with no adverse effects (see Table 2).
Discussion
Our case series demonstrates the benefits of FEES in assessing laryngopharyngeal functional impairment, guiding voice and swallow rehabilitation, and tracheostomy weaning much earlier in the ECMO patient journey. The negative psychological impact of being nil-by-mouth is well recognised (Bushuven et al., 2022; Ekberg et al., 2002; Vesey, 2013). The accuracy of FEES enables earlier swallow intervention regardless of cuff status, reducing time to oral intake (Tajitsu et al., 2022). FEES facilitated earlier targeted swallow rehabilitation with potential prevention of disuse atrophy and dysphagia chronicity (Brodsky et al., 2020). Without the accuracy of FEES, patients are kept nil-by-mouth awaiting cuff deflation or conversely allowed oral feeding with undetected dysphagia and harmful silent aspiration increasing risks associated with aspiration pneumonia; prolonging ventilation, weaning, length of stay, and mortality (Brodsky et al., 2017; Zuercher et al., 2019). FEES removes uncertainty for the MDT and patient, supporting progression of patient recovery, well-being and confidence in optimisation of oral feeding. The authors acknowledge that retrospective case series provide low level evidence.
A multidisciplinary approach with embedded SLT enables proactive dysphagia management, promotion of rehabilitation, and patient engagement (Bonvento et al., 2017; Ekberg et al., 2002; McGrath and Wallace, 2014). Patients and staff acknowledge the importance of eating and drinking for psychological recovery, strength and nutrition. Effective MDT working and risk mitigation has enabled an SLT-led FEES service for patients requiring ECMO, with no adverse effects, demonstrating safety and utility in this cohort.
Future recommendations: 1. Establishing a national SLT network to share practice, support SLT skill development, benchmark and standardise data collection of dysphagia prevalence/severity and outcomes, support equity of SLT intervention across ECMO centres. 2. ECMO centres to improve access to SLT and FEES with ring-fenced funding supported by data collection and development of business cases. 3. ECMO guidelines recognising the value of SLT and FEES, prevalence of dysphagia, supporting equitable access and safe standards of care delivery nationally.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the ECMO multidisciplinary team (MDT) at our centre, led by Dr. Miguel Garcia, ECMO Lead Consultant and to the Speech and Language Therapy team for all their dedication and support for our work.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
