Valvular Heart Diseases in Women: Where Are We Now?

Epidemiology

AS is the most prevalent VHD with clinical significance and the third most prevalent heart disease after coronary artery disease (CAD) and systemic arterial hypertension. The prevalence of AS increases with age, as it is present in 5% of the population aged ≥ 65 years old and in up to 12.4% of adults aged ≥ 75 years old. ⁹

In younger adults, calcific AS is mostly present in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), which affects 0.5% to 2% of the population in a 1:3 male to female ratio (Figure 1).^10,11 Hence, AS is most prevalent in men than in women in younger patients (ie, below 60 years of age), but this tendency shifts in elderly populations with similar prevalence between men and women. ⁶

OPEN IN VIEWER

Figure 1.

Specific Features in Aortic Valve Diseases in Female Patients.

Mechanisms and Etiologies

Rheumatic AS remains prevalent in low-income countries, and rheumatic AS is more prevalent in women, such as all rheumatic valve diseases. In high-income countries, the vast majority of encountered AS is associated to “degenerative” processes. However, the term degenerative is misleading given the very active nature of the disease. Indeed, the pathophysiology of calcific AS is characterized by lipid deposition, chronic oxidation and inflammation as well as the transition of the valvular interstitial cells to an osteoblastic phenotype, which induce fibrosis and calcium deposition and thus leaflet thickening. ¹² The resulting fibrocalcific remodeling leads to stiffening of the valve leaflets and narrowing of the valve opening, and subsequent cardiac outflow obstruction. It is well documented that for a given hemodynamic severity, women consistently present with less valvular calcification than men, but with higher levels of fibrotic and dense connective tissue within valve leaflets (Figure 1).^13,14

Compensatory responses to the chronic pressure overload imposed on the left ventricle (LV) also differ between sexes. Indeed, women most frequently display concentric hypertrophy or normal LV geometry, while eccentric and concentric hypertrophy are the most prevalent remodeling patterns in men. ¹⁵ As the LV hypertrophies, myocyte apoptosis occurs as a result of the mismatch between myocardial oxygen supply and demands. Degree of nonischemic replacement myocardial fibrosis assessed with late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is similar in men and women, but women exhibit a significantly larger extent of diffuse myocardial fibrosis regardless of AS severity (Figure 1). ¹⁶ The use of CMR in selected asymptomatic patients with severe AS may still hold great promise for optimizing the timing of aortic valve replacement (AVR) through the early detection of myocardial fibrosis and subtle ventricular decompensation.^16,17 Although the EVOLVED trial did not demonstrate a benefit of early AVR guided by CMR findings in a broad population, ¹⁸ future studies may better define specific subgroups—such as younger patients, those with rapid disease progression, or those with extensive mid-wall fibrosis—who could benefit from a CMR-guided strategy.

Diagnosis

Gold-standard for assessing AS severity is transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Values of aortic valve area (AVA) < 1.0 cm2, mean gradient >>40 mm Hg and peak aortic jet velocity >>4 m/s are diagnostic for severe AS. When echocardiographic parameters are discordant (ie, low gradient/velocity and tight AVA), which occurs in up to 40% of AS patients, dobutamine stress echocardiography can be performed to increase flow rate, and distinguish true severe from pseudo severe AS-especially in patients with low LV ejection fraction (LVEF)-, but a large proportion of patients exhibit lack of contractile reserve leading to inconclusive results.^19–21 In that case, the measurement of aortic valve calcification by computed tomography (CT) imaging is useful as it is a powerful predictor of clinical outcomes.^22,23

Findings in AS are not solely restrained to the valve itself. The chronic hemodynamic burden eventually leads to myocardial adaptations, mainly LV hypertrophy to compensate for the increased wall stress and maintain LV function. In women, concentric hypertrophy is the most frequent remodeling pattern, which explains why they more often exhibit paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) patterns (ie, low flow despite a preserved LVEF) (Figure 1). This particularity certainly accounts for the underdiagnosis of severe AS in women and their lower rates of AVR referral as their LVEF remains higher than the guideline-Class I ESC/AHA 50% threshold. ²⁴ There is consequently systematic overestimation of their LV systolic function despite significantly decreased stroke volume index. Notably, a Class IIa indication for AVR in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and LVEF below 55% is currently reported in ESC guidelines, since those values are associated with higher mortality in both men and women. ²⁵ The measurement of global longitudinal strain (GLS) could also be of incremental value in this subset of patients for assessing LV systolic function as it is more sensitive and reproducible than LVEF.^26,27,28

In patients with LFLG AS with discordant echocardiographic parameters and either preserved or reduced LVEF, aortic valve calcium (AVC) scoring by CT imaging can be very useful to assess true severity of the disease. Sex-specific thresholds of 1200 or 1300 AU in women and 2000 AU in men indicating severe AS are well established and account for the higher calcific burden in men for a given hemodynamic severity regardless of age or valve phenotype.^14,23,29,30 AVC density thresholds (AVC indexed to the cross-sectional area of the aortic annulus) have also been validated and can be used for enhanced accuracy in patients presenting annulus sizes which diverge from the sex-specific average. Rounded threshold values of 300 AU/cm² in women and 500 AU/cm² indicate severe disease but are not currently included in current American or European guidelines.^23,31

However, caution is required when interpreting AVC scores as women may present with mostly fibrotic remodeling and low calcific burden, especially in young female patients, bicuspid patients and patients with cardiac amyloidosis, who can sometimes even exhibit no calcification at all but severe hemodynamic parameters. A novel method not yet established in routine clinical setting allows for the assessment of valvular noncalcified tissue in the valvular leaflets. Assessment of aortic valve noncalcified over calcified tissue ratio measured by contrast-enhanced CT may be preferable to noncontrast CT when noncalcific tissue accounts for most of the burden causing outflow obstruction (ie, fibrosis, cardiac amyloidosis). Indeed, noncalcified/calcified tissue ratio demonstrates a better correlation with peak aortic jet velocity, especially in female patients and can improve identification of severe AS, but future studies are warranted to establish severity thresholds.^32,33

The prevalent pattern of LFLG AS in women combined with preserved LVEF and lower calcific burden might explain the association of female sex and lower rates of diagnostic testing and specialist visits compared to men. ³⁴ Greater clinical recognition of paradoxical LFLG AS is warranted to avoid underdiagnosing and undertreating women. Hence, thresholds of reduced LVEF should be increased and the echocardiographic assessment should focus additionally on myocardial deformation parameters, such as GLS ³⁵ and peak atrial longitudinal strain ³⁶ recently identified as promising tools potentially aiming to guide optimal AVR timing. However, despite a complete myocardial deformation assessment has been recently introduced in a staging system framework in AS, ³⁷ sex-specific data are currently lacking.

Treatment

The natural history of AS can be divided into 2 phases; the first one being the clinically silent progression of the valve disease over many years, during which myocardial adaptations occur as a result of the chronic afterload enforced on the left ventricle. The second phase is characterized by the onset of symptoms, classically dyspnea, angina, and syncope. Once these symptoms occur, the prognosis is poor, with an expected survival of 2 to 3 years if no intervention is performed. ³⁸ Treatment options consist of AVR either surgically (SAVR) of by percutaneous access (TAVR), as no pharmacological treatment has been proven to be effective in treating or halting progression of AS. Formal indications of intervention include severe symptomatic disease or asymptomatic severe disease with LVEF below 50% or if another cardiac surgery is planned (Class I).^24,25

At time of AVR referral, female patients are consistently older, exhibit higher left atrial volumes and pulmonary pressures than men, and present with more symptoms. However, for the same AS severity, AVR is less likely to be performed on women compared to men, even after age matching. ³⁹ This may be partially explained by men being more likely to require concomitant cardiac surgery (ie, coronary artery bypass graft [CABG], aorta repair, or replacement). Prior to intervention, men have more cardiovascular comorbidities than women, with higher prevalence of diabetes, previous myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG surgery, peripheral artery disease and low LVEF. ³⁹

The literature is clear on the fact that male patients have a better prognosis after SAVR than their female counterparts.^40,41 Indeed, men often exhibit AS characteristics more favorable for SAVR, such as bicuspid aortic valves, lower prevalence of small aortic annuli (SAA) and higher levels of valvular calcific tissue (Figure 1). While this greater calcium burden may contribute to better outcomes after SAVR by facilitating complete excision of the diseased valve, it is also a strong predictor of significant paravalvular leak after TAVR with both self-expandable and balloon-expandable valves. ⁴²

On the other hand, women frequently exhibit AS patterns associated with worse outcomes after SAVR, such as LFLG AS with preserved LVEF. ⁴³ The less invasive nature of TAVR can therefore benefit female patients given their worse preoperative profile and older age, in addition to their often-impaired diastolic function and reduced stroke volume index, which puts them at an increased operative risk.^{44–48,49–52} Conversely, mortality as well as rates of permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke and bleeding are higher in female patients undergoing SAVR compared with their male counterparts, especially in the early postoperative period. ⁵³ Nevertheless, there remains inconsistencies in the literature as several studies comparing SAVR outcomes in women and men report similar baseline-matched long-term survival.^54–56

Interestingly, it has been shown that concentric hypertrophy is associated with a high risk (60%) of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality in women both before and after AVR, independent of intervention strategy, while this association is not found in male patients. ⁵⁷ Consistent with these results, residual LV hypertrophy post-AVR has been associated with significantly worse outcomes in women compared to men. ⁵⁸

Many female patients, especially elder women exhibit SAA, which presents an additional challenge in the treatment of AS and is associated with worse postoperative outcomes. According to recent studies, TAVR seems to associate with superior hemodynamic results and lower rates of prosthesis patient mismatch (PPM) in these patients. ⁵⁹ PPM is a major operative concern in patients with SAA as it is linked to lower LV mass regression, compromised normalization of coronary flow reserve, suboptimal LV function after AVR, and is a powerful predictor of long-term mortality as well as structural valve deterioration.^60,61 Results from the PARTNER trial also exhibit lower 2-year mortality in SAA patients who underwent TAVR versus SAVR. ⁶² However, the VIVA trial revealed conflicting results with previous studies. Indeed, in this cohort of patients with SAA, which included more than 90% of women, TAVR was not superior to SAVR regarding hemodynamic or clinical outcomes, and there were no significant differences in severe PPM rates between the 2 treatments. ⁶³ Hence, further studies, with larger cohorts are warranted to either corroborate or invalidate these novel findings.

A particular concern must be addressed in women of childbearing age who require AVR (Figure 1). Usually, mechanical prosthesis is preferred in young patients given the increased durability of the device compared to biological prostheses, which have a life expectancy of about 10 to 15 years. However, the choice of a mechanical valve requires long-term anticoagulation, which is possible in pregnancy by opting for a low molecular weight heparin, but not ideal. Indeed, it is less effective than warfarin in preventing thrombotic events, but the latter is associated with high pregnancy loss and fetal complications. ⁶⁴ Hence, no anticoagulation strategy is truly safe for both mother and fetus, which is why mechanical valves should be avoided in women who are planning pregnancy. An especially attractive option in this subset of patients is the Ross procedure, which consists of replacing the diseased aortic valve with the patient's own pulmonary valve followed by the placement of a homograft in the pulmonary position. ⁶⁵ Freedom of reoperation for aortic valve at 15 years is also much higher (90.0% vs 57.1%) with the Ross procedure than with a bioprosthesis. ⁶⁶ At 25 years the freedom from reintervention remains high with 70.5% for the autograft and 74.3% for the right ventricular outflow tract. ⁶⁷ However, this procedure is technically challenging, and its outcomes are highly contingent upon hospital surgical volumes and cardiac surgeon expertise. ⁶⁸ Lastly, the nature of the procedure involves the inherent risk of converting a single-valve disease into a double-valve disease.

Considering the interaction of multiple individual baseline characteristics in female patients presenting with severe AS, it should be highlighted that decisions regarding intervention type for treating AS require careful discussion by a specialized heart team, as there is no “one treatment fits all.” Surely, high-risk elder women and female patients with paradoxical LFLG benefit the most from TAVR, but the option of SAVR must not be denied to female patients in low/moderate-risk patients presenting with favorable anatomic and hemodynamic characteristics for surgical approach solely based on sex.

Mitral Valve Disease

Mitral valve disease (MVD) is one of the most common forms of VHD associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and its incidence increases with age.^1,83–85

Nonrheumatic degenerative mitral valve heart diseases showed a prevalence of approximately 16,000,000 in 2022, accounting for roughly 38,000 deaths worldwide. ⁸⁶

Rheumatic MVD remains a major global health burden, with over 40 million cases likely in 2021, based on rheumatic heart disease estimates. It disproportionately affects younger populations in low-sociodemographic index regions, especially sub-Saharan Africa, with age-standardized prevalence over 1100 per 100,000. ⁸⁷ While disability-adjusted life years have declined since 1990, the rising prevalence underscores ongoing disparities in prevention and care. ⁸⁷

MVD encompasses MR and MS, including also overlapping between MR and MS. ⁸⁸ Furthermore, the presence of mitral annular calcification (MAC) is of utmost importance, since distinct sex-specific feature are observed in this condition.

Mitral Regurgitation

Epidemiology and physiopathology

MR is the second most common VHD after AS in high-income countries (31.5 vs 43.1%) ⁸⁴ and is defined as retrograde flow from the LV to the left atrium during systole ⁸⁹ : this occurs when there is inadequate coaptation of the mitral valve leaflets during systole and a change in the pressure gradient between the atrium and ventricle. ⁹⁰ Trivial MR is common in the general population, with a prevalence of 40%. However, significant MR is associated with increased mortality, regardless of LV function and associated comorbidities, impacting over 24 million people worldwide and resulting in over 34,000 deaths in 2019. Moderate or severe MR increases with age and affects 9.3% of the population over 75 years of age. In the United States, there were more than 2 to 2.5 million affected patients in 2000, with the prevalence of MR increasing at a rate of 0.7% in patients aged 18 to 44 years and 13.3% in patients over 75 years. This burden is expected to grow in the next years due to the progressive ageing of the population.^{83,86,88,91,92–95} It is either equally common in both men and women, or slightly more common in women. Regarding pathophysiology, MR is classified in 2 categories^24,25,90,96 with different underlying mechanisms: primary and secondary MR.

Primary MR, also referred to as organic or degenerative MR, occurs when there is a structural abnormality of the mitral leaflets or subvalvular apparatus, ie, chordae tendineae or papillary muscles. This phenotype is the most common form of MR in the United States. ⁹⁷ It encompasses a series of alterations: acquired or congenital tissue changes, infiltrative or dysplastic, leading to elongation or rupture of the cords resulting in leaflet prolapse or flail, as well as mitral annular dilatation. ⁹⁸ Approximately 2% of the general population is affected, with 5% to 6% of prevalence in women. Although more common in women, evidence of severe regurgitation associated with organic MR is more frequent in men.^99–101

While the prevalence of rheumatic diseases has declined in high-income countries, they remain a common cause of MR—especially in women—characterized by calcific deposits, fibrous thickening of the leaflets, fibrosis of the papillary muscles, and asymmetric annular dilatation.^{85,98,102,103} Furthermore, MAC is another organic mechanism involved in MR, prevalent among individuals over the age of 60 (Figure 2). The pathogenesis is not well understood but may be attributed to mechanical stress on the annulus. In this situation, concomitant calcific AS may be present. MAC can cause leaflet deformation and chordal elongation, leading to regurgitation as a result of leaflet displacement or immobilization, which hinders correct valvular coaptation.^104–106

OPEN IN VIEWER

Figure 2.

Specific Features in Mitral Valve Disease in Females Patients.

In general, women with organic MR tend to have a higher prevalence of rheumatic MR, more severe MAC, fewer leaflet flails, and an increased frequency of bileaflet or anterior prolapse as well as generalized myxomatous degeneration (Figure 2).^{100,101,107–110}

Secondary MR, also called functional MR, it is primarily the result of primary LV pathology which induces remodeling and dysfunction in an anatomically normal valve, more specifically, an altered geometry of the LV causing dilatation of the mitral valve annulus resulting in incomplete systolic leaflet coaptation, or left atrial anomaly^{89,93,110,111}

The most common cause of functional MR is ischemic dilatation of the LV and/or ischemic fibrosis of the papillary muscle. ¹¹² Ischemic lesions induce negative and progressive LV remodeling. Initially, the MR associated with this etiology is frequently moderate, ¹¹³ and it occurs in 20% to 50% of patients early after acute myocardial infarction. Moderate ischemic MR may progress to severe MR over time and after 30-days from acute myocardial infarction 12% of patients exhibit more than moderate MR. The prevalence rises up to 20% in patients with concomitant heart failure and previous myocardial infarction.^113–115 Other studies have estimated that up to 40% of patients with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy develop functional MR.^89,116

LV remodeling due to acute coronary syndromes and ischemic heart disease, leading functional MR, is more common in men than in women (Figure 2). In contrast, functional MR due to left atrial dilatation is more frequent in women.^117,118

Secondary MR may occur in a nonischemic context when dilation and LV remodeling are not associated with CAD but linked to other abnormalities such as dilated cardiomyopathies. In this scenario, potential mechanisms involved in the development of MR include a decrease in transmural pressure gradient, geometric changes in the mitral annulus, papillary muscles, and mitral valve, and dyssynchronous LV contractions.^89,116

Mitral Stenosis

MS could be caused by rheumatic heart disease and characterized by commissural fusion that directly causes stenosis, ¹³⁶ or by exuberant MAC and valvular calcification, ¹³⁷ both being more prevalent in women (Figure 2). Narrowing of the valve orifice can result in increased left atrial pressure, increased pulmonary venous pressure, exertional dyspnea, right heart failure, and the onset of atrial fibrillation.^88,138 The majority of patients with rheumatic MS are young and predominantly female, with an increased inflammatory process,^139–141 while patients with degenerative MS are older but still predominantly female ¹³⁷ (Figure 2).

MS severity is graded by integrating mitral valve area (MVA) and transmitral mean pressure gradient (MPG) with clinical context.^25,142 Direct planimetry is the reference, with MVA ≤1.5 cm² indicating clinically relevant MS. Pressure half-time (PHT)-derived MVA ≤1.5 cm² supports clinically relevant stenosis but may be inaccurate in altered compliance or postvalvotomy states. Severe MS typically presents with MPG ≥10 mm Hg at normal heart rates, though gradient is influenced by flow conditions. ¹⁴² Stress echocardiography can uncover exercise-induced MPG ≥15 mm Hg or pulmonary artery systolic pressure >>60 mm Hg, refining severity assessment and timing of intervention. ¹⁴²

Previous research has specifically examined low-gradient severe rheumatic MS, characterized by discordant echocardiographic markers of severity. ¹⁴³ This phenotype, more commonly observed in women, is associated with limited clinical benefit from mitral valvuloplasty. Contributing factors include intrinsic MS combined with ventricular–vascular uncoupling, reduced left ventricular compliance, and a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation. ¹⁴³

Treatment of MS includes procedures such as balloon valvuloplasty, commissurotomy, or valve replacement if the patient's clinical condition worsens and symptoms develop. ⁸⁸

Epidemiology, Classification and Pathophysiology

TR represents a VHD recently gaining interest as a burdensome health problem independently linked to morbidity and mortality. ¹⁵⁰ Significantly sex-differences in TR epidemiology have been highlighted, with an overall prevalence of moderate-to-severe forms around 4% in patients aged 75 years of older (0.55% overall), mostly encountered in women (approximately 60% of cases).^92,151,152 Sex specific differences have been previously demonstrated at the time of diagnosis, suggesting that women are diagnosed with severe TR at later age, compared to men. ⁹⁴

The most recent TR classification accounts on its etiology and mechanism, proposing 3 different groups: (1) primary TR, a rare entity determined by a primitive lesion of the tricuspid valve (congenital—ie, Ebstein`s anomaly, tricuspid dysplasia, or acquired—ie, myxomatous degeneration, carcinoid syndrome); (2) secondary TR, the most common form with normal valve apparatus but inadequate coaptation between the tricuspid leaflet, driven and sustained by secondary causes involving the right or left heart morphology and/or function; and (3) Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Lead-Induced TR, due to leads interference with the tricuspid valvular-apparatus. ¹⁵³ Although the atrial (A-STR) and ventricular (V-STR) forms of secondary TR are distinctively described and account for approximately 80% of cases, there must be recognized some overlap. Notably, the long-standing presence of significant isolated A-STR could lead to a right-sided volume overload which may induce right ventricular dilation and dysfunction, making not always clear the real distinction between A-STR and V-STR. ¹⁵³ Whether it is well established that V-STR carries worse prognosis than A-STR, the recent focus of research shifted towards the pathophysiology and progression of A-STR which seemed to be linked to important sex-differences.^154,155 A-STR is diagnosed commonly in elderly women, with long-standing atrial fibrillation or coexisting heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)^155,156 (Figure 3). The underlying pathophysiological mechanism is related to the dilation of the tricuspid anulus imposed by the right atrial enlargement, accompanied by a lack of adaptative growth of tricuspid valve leaflets. ¹⁵⁵ Separately from an etiological classification, some studies proposed a stratification of TR guided by the clinical context.^151,152 TR is rarely isolated and often is diagnosed with associated left-sided VHDs or LV disfunction, presenting frequently concomitant sign of pulmonary hypertension. ¹⁵¹ The clinical-context presents important sex-differences in presentation, revealing how the combination of TR and concomitant LV dysfunction is a peculiar scenario where women are interestingly less involved. ¹⁵⁷

OPEN IN VIEWER

Figure 3.

Specific Features in Tricuspid Regurgitation in Females Patients.

The impact of sex in the prognosis of TR still represents a novel field of research, with available paucity of evidence. A study by Dietz et al ¹⁵⁸ in a large cohort of 1569 patients with significant TR (only 5% primary TR) found that sex did not present independent association on long-term mortality, after covariate-balance with propensity score matching (Figure 3). This study cohort was represented mostly by patients with significant TR followed under medical management (only 13% underwent tricuspid valve surgery during the follow-up).

Tricuspid Valve Intervention Strategies

Medical therapy represents the pivotal cornerstone in the context of TR, leading to the optimization of the volemic state (diuretics) and to manage the underlying conditions responsible of TR worsening (ie, antiremodeling therapy in the presence of heart failure, antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control). ²⁴ Interesting sex-differences were found in the medical treatment response in patients with HFpEF potentially influencing A-STR management: women may respond more favorably to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and receptor-neprilisyn inhibitors.^159–161

The current 2020 AHA/ESC guidelines report one unique Class I indication for tricuspid valve surgery established severe TR in the context of concomitant left-sided valve surgery. ²⁴ Notably, the presence of signs or symptoms of heart failure in conjunction with severe TR, as well as progressive right ventricular dysfunction in asymptomatic severe primitive TR, are classified as Class II indications for isolated tricuspid valve surgery (IIa and IIb respectively). ²⁴ Consequently, numerous patients with severe TR are treated at advanced stages of the disease, prompting intensified research into early intervention strategies. ¹⁶² In the current landscape, notable technological advancement in transcatheter-tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has positioned TTVI as a viable option for severe symptomatic TR, but the optimal timing for early-treatment remains unexplored.^163,164 Significant sex-disparities are reported in literature in the outcome of patients undergoing mitral valve surgery and concomitant TR. Previous studies reported that women tend to develop severe TR with higher reoperation rates than men after mitral valve surgery.^{165–167,168}

Furthermore, significant racial/ethnic and sex disparities exist in tricuspid valve surgery utilization in the United States, with lower rates among Black, Hispanic, and female patients. Women had lower odds of acute kidney injury but higher odds of blood transfusion. In-hospital mortality and major complications were similar across all groups. Further research is needed to address these disparities. ¹⁶⁹

Finally, recent research focused specifically on sex-difference in patients undergoing TTVI.

Women with TR often present for transcatheter intervention at more advanced stages, with worse functional status and comorbidities. ¹⁷⁰ Although procedural outcomes are similar, ¹⁷¹ men may derive greater quality-of-life improvements. ¹⁷² These patterns suggest later referral in women, potentially due to slower disease progression, underrecognition of symptoms, or differing clinical thresholds. ¹⁷³

A multicentric study by Fortmeier et al ¹⁷¹ enrolling 702 patients undergoing TTVI found no difference of 2-years overall mortality between sexes, however were reported different prognostically sex-specific threshold of tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion and mean pulmonary pressure ratio (TAPSE/mPAP). A higher TAPSE/mPAP threshold in women has been identified, potentially suggesting that women could present better right ventricular systolic performance relative to pulmonary artery pressure levels than men. ¹⁷¹ The tendency of women to present higher right ventricular systolic reserve was also reported by a study involving patients with significant TR, where men reported lower right longitudinal function parameters for the same TR degree severity. ¹⁷⁴ Nevertheless, these findings seem not to translate in outcome sex-differences after TTVI accordingly to current studies.^171,175

Clinical Implication

Sex differences in TR are present in epidemiology, etiology and treatment-outcome link (Figure 3). Evidence supporting prompt referral for early surgery or transcatheter options is growing in order to improve the outcome, especially for moderate to severe TR. Despite surgery being long-time the gold standard of TR interventions, transcatheter approaches offer nowadays promising alternative. However, sex-disparities persist in treatment rates, delays, redo-interventions, and outcomes. Standardized care and risk assessment could improve treatment selection, particularly for women, reducing disparities. More research is required to assess the best treatment option (surgical vs transcatheter) accounting for sex-differences.