A Preservice Special Education Teacher's Construction of Knowledge: Implications for Coursework and Retention in the Field

Abstract

This case study looks closely at one preservice special education teacher candidate's views on how her coursework, program requirements, and practical experiences influenced her knowledge of teaching. Her perspectives are examined through the research-based frameworks of Hanline (2010), Shulman (1986), and Cochran-Smith and Lytle (1999). These three different frameworks outline the various types of knowledge needed for effective instruction. Further, this article provides insight into how preservice teachers' knowledge is constructed. This insight can influence program creation and implementation as well as help focus attention on teacher retention within special education in rural communities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brouwer,

, & Korthagen,

(2005). Can teacher education make a difference? American Research Journal, 42 (1), 153-224.

Cochran-Smith,

, & Lytle,

S.L.

(1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.

Hammer,

, Hughes,

, McClure,

, Reeves,

, & Salgado,

(2005). Rural teacher recruitment and retention practices: A review of research literature, national survey of rural superintendents, and case studies of programs in Virginia. Charleston, WV: Edvantia, Inc.

Hanline,

M.F.

(2010). Preservice teachers' perceptions of field experiences in inclusive preschool settings: Implications for personnel preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33 (4), 335-351. doi: 10.1177/0888406409360144

Monk,

(2007). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas. The Future of Children, 17 (1), 155-174.

Muse,

, & Thomas,

(1992). Elementary education. In Galbraith

M. W.

, (Ed.), Education in Rural American Community (pp. 45-72). Malabar, FL: Krieger.

O'Brien,

, Stoner,

, Appel,

, & House,

(2007). The first field experience: Perspectives of preservice and cooperating teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 264-275.

Purcell-Gates,

(2004). Ethnographic research. In Duke

and Mallette

(Eds.), Literacy Research Methodologies (pp. 92-113). New York, NY: Guilford Press, Inc.

Sears,

, Cavallaro,

, & Hall,

(2004). Quality early field experiences for undergraduates. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 75-79.

10.

Shulman,

L.S.

(1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.

11.

Whitney,

, Golez,

, Nagel,

, & Nieto,

(2002). Listening to voices of practicing teachers to examine the effectiveness of a teacher education program. Action in Teacher Education, 23, 69-76.