Little is known about the implementation of assistive technology (AT) services for students in rural areas. This study investigated the AT service delivery in 10 rural districts across six states. The results indicated that students use AT across functional areas, but considerably fewer number of devices than do those not living in rural areas. AT experts attended a low percentage of IEP meetings, and the AT expertise of related service personnel is rated highly. Teachers reported that rural students have access to the technology they need; however, they also indicated they needed more training on available technology for their students.
Bausch,M. E., & Ault,M. J. (2012). Status of assistive technology instruction in university personnel preparation programs. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8(1), 1-14.
2.
Bausch,M. E., Ault,M. J., Evmenova,A. S., & Behrmann,M. M. (2008). Going beyond AT devices: Are AT services being considered?Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(2), 1-16.
3.
Bausch,M. E., Ault,M. J., Quinn,B. S., Behrmann,M. M., & Chung,Y. (2009). Assistive technology in the individualized education plan: Analysis of policies across ten states. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 22(1), 9-23.
4.
Bell,J. K. (2001). Assistive technology policies of state departments of education and the impact of the 1997 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act on those policies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky Lexington.
5.
Blackhurst,A. E., & Lahm,E. (2000). Technology and exceptionality foundations. In LindseyJ. D. (Ed.), Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed.), pp. 3-45). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
6.
Filemaker Pro (Version 5.0) [Computer software].Santa Clara, CA: Filemaker Inc.
7.
Gitlow,L., & Sanford,T. (2003). Assistive technology education needs of allied health professionals in a rural state. Journal of Allied Health, 32(1), 46-51.
Jeffs,T., & Morrison,W. F. (2005). Special education technology addressing diversity: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(4), 19-25.
12.
Kent,R. M., & Barnes,M. P. (2000). An epidemiological survey of the health needs of disabled people in a rural community. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14, 481-490.
13.
Keramidas,C., & Collins,B. C. (2009). Assistive technology use with birth to three population: A rural perspective. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(1), 38-48.
14.
Lahm,E. A., Bausch,M. E., Hasselbring,T. S., & Blackhurst,A. E. (2001). National assistive technology research institute. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(3), 19-26.
15.
Lincoln,Y. S., & Guba,E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Long,T. M., Woolverton,M., Perry,D. F., & Thomas,M. J. (2007). Training needs of pediatric occupational therapists in assistive technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 345-354.
17.
Marino,M. T., Marino,E. C., & Shaw,S. F. (2006). Making informed assistive technology decisions for students with high incidence disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(6), 18-25.
18.
Nvivo (Version 2.0) [Computer software].Melbourne, Australia: QSR International Pty Ltd.
19.
Puckett,K. S. (2004). Project ACCESS: Field testing an assistive technology toolkit for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), 5-17.
20.
Quinn,B. S., Behrmann,M., Mastropieri,M., Bausch,M. E., Ault,M. J., & Chung,Y. (2009). Who is using assistive technology in schools?Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(1), 1-14.
