The contemporary discourse on organizational project management (OPM) complements project, program, and portfolio management with emerging elements, such as governance, projectification, the project management office (PMO), and organizational design. This creates the need for an integrated model that defines the content and roles in OPM. This article addresses this by conceptually developing a seven-layered model that organizes 22 OPM elements, ranging from the corporate level to the management of individual projects. A theory is developed to explain the interaction of the elements and the layers within the model.
ArttoK.KujalaJ.DietrichP.MartinsuoM. (2008). What is project strategy?International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 4–12.
3.
Association for Project Management. (2011). Directing change: A guide to governance of project management. Princes Risborough, UK: Association for Project Management.
4.
AtkinsonR. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342.
5.
AubryM.HobbsB.ThuillierD. (2007). A new framework for understanding organizational project management through the PMO. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 328–336.
6.
AubryM.Lavoie-TremblayM. (2017). Organizing for the management of projects: The project management office in the dynamics of organizational design. In SankaranS.MüllerR.DrouinN. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of organizational project management (pp. 119–133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
AubryM.Lavoie-TremblayM. (2018). Rethinking organizational design for managing multiple projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 12–26.
8.
BarthesR. (2013). Mythologies. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
9.
BlomquistT.MüllerR. (2006). Middle managers in program and portfolio management: Practice, roles and responsibilities. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
BurnsT.StalkerG. M. (1994). The management of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
ChiaR. (2013). Paradigms and perspectives in organizational project management research: Implications for knowledge-creation. In SankaranS.MüllerR.DrouinN. (Eds.), Novel approaches to organizational project management research: Translational and transformational (pp. 33–55). Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
13.
Cooke-DaviesT. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185–190.
14.
CooperR. G.EdgettS. J.KleinschmidtE. J. (2004). Benchmarking best NPD practices—I. Research Technology Management, 47, 31–43.
15.
CrawfordL. (2006). Developing organizational project management capability: Theory and practice. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 74–86.
16.
CrawfordL.Cooke-DaviesT.HobbsB.LabuschagneL.RemingtonK.ChenP. (2008). Governance and support in the sponsoring of projects and programs. Project Management Journal, 39(1Suppl), S43–S55.
17.
De CarvalhoM. M.LaurindoF. J. B.PessôaM. S. de P. (2009). Organisational project management models. In Khosrow-PourM. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (2nd ed.). (pp. 2941–2947). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
18.
DeanM. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.
19.
De OliveiraW. A.de MuylderC. F. (2012). Value creation from organizational project management: A case study in a government agency. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 9(3), 497–514.
20.
DingleJ.ToppingD.WatkinsonM. (1995). Procurement and contract strategy. In TurnerR. (Ed.), The commercial project manager (pp. 243–267). Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill.
21.
DonaldsonL. (1985). Organizational design and life-cycle of products. Journal of Management Studies, 22(1), 25–37.
22.
DonaldsonL. (1987). Strategy and structural adjustment and regain fit to performance: In defence of contingency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 24(1), 1–24.
23.
DonaldsonL. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24.
DonaldsonL.CleggS. R.HardyC., & Nord. (1996). The normal science of structural contingency theory (pp. 57–76). London, England: Sage Publications.
25.
DrouinN.JugdevK. (2014). Standing on the shoulders of strategic management giants to advance organizational project management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(1), 61–77.
26.
DrouinN.MüllerR.SankaranS. (2017). The nature of organizational project management through the lens of integration. In SankaranS.MüllerR.DrouinN. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of organizational project management (pp. 9–18). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
FlyvbjergB. (2011). Over budget, over time, over and over again. In MorrisP. W. G.PintoJ. K.SöderlundJ. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 321–344). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
FlyvbjergB. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.
30.
GareisR.HuemannM. (2007). Maturity models for the project-oriented company. In TurnerJ. R. (Ed.), Gower handbook of project management (4th ed.). (pp. 183–208). Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing Ltd.
31.
GemündenH. G.LehnerP.KockA. (2018). The project-oriented organization and its contribution to innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 147–160.
32.
HobbsB.AubryM. (2007). A multi-phase research program investigating project management offices (PMOs): The results of phase 1. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 74–86.
33.
HobdayM. (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?Research Policy, 29(7–8), 871–893.
34.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2017). Project, programme and portfolio management—Guidance on governance. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO Copyright Office.
35.
JohnsG. (2006). The essential impact of content on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.
36.
JugdevK. (2017). Strengthening the connection between strategy and organizational project management. In SankaranS.MüllerR.DrouinN. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of organizational project management (pp. 44–54). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
37.
KillenC. P.DrouinN. (2017). Project portfolio management. In SankaranS.MüllerR.DrouinN. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of organizational project management (pp. 55–69). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
38.
KlakeggO. J.VoldenG. H. (2017). Governance in the public sector: The Norwegian case. In MüllerR. (Ed.), Governance and governmentality for projects: Enablers, practice and consequences (pp. 129–156). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
KopmannJ.KockA.KillenC. P. (2017). Project portfolio management. In SankaranS.MüllerR.DrouinN. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of organizational project management. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40.
LundinR. A.ArvidssonN.BradyT.EkstedtE., C, M.SydowJ. (2015). Managing and working in project society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MartinsuoM. (2012). Project portfolio management in practice and in context. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 794–803.
42.
MaylorH.BradyT.Cooke-DaviesT.HodgsonD. (2006). From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663–674.
43.
MeyerA. D.TsuiQ. S.HiningsC. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195.
44.
MidlerC. (1995). “Projectification” of the firm: The Renault case. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 363–375.
45.
MiterevM.EngwallM.JerbrantA. (2017). Mechanisms of isomorphism in project-based organziations. Project Management Journal, 48(5), 9–24.
46.
MiterevM.ManciniM.TurnerR. (2017). Towards a design for the project-based organization. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 479–491.
47.
MiterevM.TurnerJ. R.ManciniM. (2017). The organization design perspective on the project-based organziation: A structured review. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(3), 527–549.
48.
MowdayR. T.SuttonR. I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 195–229.
MüllerR. (2017a). Private sector practices. In MüllerR. (Ed.), Governance and governmentality for projects: Enablers, practices and consequences (pp. 107–128). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
MüllerR. (2017b). Organziational project governance. In MüllerR. (Ed.), Governance and governmentality for projects: Enablers, practices and consequences (pp. 11–24). New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
MüllerR.AndersenE. S.KlakeggO. J.VoldenG. H. (2017). Governance institutions. In MüllerR. (Ed.), Governance and governmentality for projects: Enablers, practices, and consequences (pp. 51–66). New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
MüllerR.GemündenH. (2018). Governance und governmentality: Das Yin und Yang der Steuerung in projektbasierten Organisationen. (Governance and governmentality: The yin and yang in steering project-based organizations). Zeitschrift Für Führung und Organisation, 87(5), 309–313.
54.
MüllerR.LecoeuvreL. (2014). Operationalizing governance categories of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1346–1357.
55.
MüllerR.StawickiJ. (2006). A framework for building successful project-based organizations. In Proceedings of the 20 IPMA World Conference on Project Management, October 16–17, 2006, Shanghai, China.
56.
MüllerR.TurnerJ. R. (2005). The impact of principal-agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager. International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 398–403.
57.
MüllerR.ZhaiL.WangA. (2017). Governance and governmentality in projects: Profiles and relationships with success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 378–392.
58.
MüllerR.ZhaiL.WangA.ShaoJ. (2016). A framework for governance of projects: Governmentality, governance structure and projectification. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 957–969.
59.
Office of Governance Commerce (OGC). (2008). OGC governance. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ogc.gov.uk
60.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001). Governance in the 21st century. OECD. Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/futures/17394484.pdf
SainatiT.BrookesN.LocatelliG. (2017). Special purpose entities in megaprojects: Empty boxes or real companies?Project Management Journal, 48(2), 55–73.
72.
SankaranS.MüllerR.DrouinN. (2017). Cambridge handbook of organizational project management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
SharifiM. M.SafariM. (2016). Application of net cash flow at risk in project portfolio selection. Project Management Journal, 47(4), 68–78.
74.
ShenharA. J.DvirD. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
75.
SimardM.AubryM.LabergeD. (2018). The utopia of order versus chaos: A conceptual framework for governance, organizational design and governmentality in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 460–473.
76.
SöderlundJ. (2004). On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 655–667.
77.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
78.
TurnerJ. R. (2004). Farsighted project contract management: Incomplete in its entirety. Construction Management and Economics, 22(1), 75–83.
79.
TurnerJ. R. (2014). Projects and their management. In TurnerR. (Ed.), Gower handbook of project management (5th ed.). (pp. 19–34). Farnham, Surrey, UK: Gower Publishing Ltd.
80.
TurnerJ. R. (2018). The management of the project-based organization: A personal reflection. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 231–240.
81.
TurnerJ. R.MüllerR. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8.
82.
UngerB. N.GemündenH. G.AubryM. (2012). The three roles of a project portfolio management office: Their impact on portfolio management execution and success. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 608–620.
VossM. (2012). Impact of customer integration on project portfolio management and its success: Developing a conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 567–581.
85.
ZwikaelO.ChihY.MeredithJ. R. (2018). Project benefit management: Setting effective target benefits. International Journal of Project Management, 36(4), 650–658.
