Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the transfer of training and functional approaches in improving perceptual and functional abilities after stroke.
Design: Patients identified as having perceptual problems were randomly allocated to either the transfer of training approach or the functional approach for perceptual treatment. On completion of six weeks of treatment, each patient was reassessed for perceptual and functional abilities.
Subjects and setting: Eighty inpatients on the Nottingham Stroke Unit.
Interventionsy: Perceptual treatment was given for 2.5 hours per week for six weeks.
Main outcome measures: Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery, Barthel ADL Index and Edmans ADL index.
Results: There was no significant difference between the treatment groups on patient characteristics or impairments. The results also showed no significant difference between the treatment groups before and after treatment on perceptual ability total scores, individual perceptual subtest scores, or functional ability total scores (Mann–Whitney U 642.5–798.0, p > 0.05). Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks tests showed a significant improvement in both groups after treatment on perceptual and functional abilities (perceptual z = 6.02, p < 0.001, functional z = 6.72, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: These results indicated that the improvement in perceptual abilities was equivalent using either of the two approaches. This could be due to spontaneous recovery or the effects of the Stroke Unit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews K, Brocklehurst JC, Richards B, Laycock PJ. The prognostic value of picture drawings by stroke patients. Rheumatol Rehabil1980; 19: 180–188.
2.
Bernspang B, Lindberg M, Fugl-Meyer AR. Incidence and prevalence of visual perceptual dysfunction in stroke victims. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress World Federation of OTs, Hamburg. World Federation of Occupational Therapists, 1982: 543–547.
3.
Van Ravensberg CD, Tyldesley DA, Rozendal RH, Whiting HTA. Visual perception in hemiplegic patients.Arch Phys Med. Rehabil1984; 65: 304–309.
4.
Edmans JA, Lincoln NB. The frequency of perceptual deficits after stroke. Clin Rehabil1987; 1: 273–281.
5.
Lorenze EJ, Canco R. Dysfunction in visual perception with hemiplegia: its relation to activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1962; 514–517.
6.
Tsai LJ, Howe TH, Lieu IN. Visuospatial deficits in stroke patients and their relationship to dressing performance. J Formosan Med Assoc1983; 82: 353–359.
7.
Bernspang B, Bergstrom K, Eriksson S, Konradsson WL, Fugl-Meyer AR. The impact of visual perceptual dysfunctions on ADL performance in stroke with hemiplegia. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress World Federation of Occupational Therapists, Hamburg. World Federation of Occupational Therapists, 1982: 442–445.
8.
Whiting S, Lincoln NB, Bhavnani G, Cockburn J. The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery. Windsor: NFER–Nelson, Windsor, 1985.
9.
Edmans JA, Lincoln NB. The relation between perceptual deficits after stroke and independence in ADL. Br J Occup Ther1990; 139-142.
10.
Jesshope HJ, Clark MS, Smith DS. The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery: its application to stroke patients and relationship with function. Clin Rehabil1991; 5: 115–122.
11.
Donnelly SM, Hextell D, Matthey S. The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery: its relationship to selected functional activities. Br J Occup Ther1998; 61: 27–32.
12.
Zoltan B, Siev E, Freishtat B. The adult stroke patient: A manual for evaluation and treatment of perceptual and cognitive dysfunction. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc., 1986.
13.
Diller L, Ben-Yishay Y, Gerstman LJ, Goodkin R, Gordon WA, Weinberg J. Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia. Rehabilitation Monograph no. 50, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Medical Center, New York, 1974.
14.
Weinberg J, Diller L, Gordan WA et al. Training sensory awareness and spatial organisation in people with right brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1979; 60: 491–496.
15.
Weinberg J, Piasetsky E, Diller L, Gordan WA. Treating perceptual organisation deficits in non neglecting RBD stroke patients. J Clin Neuropsychol1982; 4: 59–75.
16.
Young GC, Collins D, Hren M. Effect of pairing scanning training with block design training in the remediation of perceptual problems in left hemiplegics. J Clin Neuropsychol1983; 5: 201–212.
17.
Gordon WA, Hibbard M, Egelko S et al. Perceptual remediation in patients with right brain damage. A comprehensive program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1985; 66: 353–359.
18.
Söderback I, Normell LA. Intellectual function training in adults with acquired brain damage: evaluation. Scand J Rehabil Med1986; 18: 147–153.
19.
Robertson IH, Gray JM, McKenzie S. Microcomputer based cognitive rehabilitation of visual neglect: three multiple-baseline single case studies. Brain Injury1988; 2: 151–163.
20.
Wagenaar RC, Van Wieringen PCW, Netelenbos JB, Meijer OG, Kuik DJ. The transfer of scanning training effects in visual inattention after stroke: five single-case studies. Disabil Rehabil1992; 14: 51–60.
21.
Robertson IH, North NT, Geggie C. Spatiomotor cueing in unilateral left neglect: three case studies of its therapeutic effects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1992; 55: 799–805.
22.
Ladavas E, Menghini G, Umilka C. A rehabilitation study of hemispatial neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychol1994; 11: 75–95.
23.
Prada G, Tallis R. Treatment of the neglect syndrome in stroke patients using a contingency electrical stimulator. Clin Rehabil1995; 9: 304–313.
24.
Taylor MM, Schaeffer JN, Blumenthal FS, Grisell JL. Perceptual training in patients with left hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1971; 163–169.
25.
Lincoln NB, Whiting S, Cockburn J, Bhavnani G. An evaluation of perceptual retraining. Int Rehabil Med1985; 7: 99–101.
26.
Edmans JA, Lincoln NB. Treatment of visual perceptual deficits after stroke: four single case studies. Int Disabil Stud1989; 2: 25–33.
27.
Robertson IH, Gray JM, Pentland B, Waite LJ. Microcomputer-based rehabilitation for unilateral left visual neglect: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 663–668.
28.
Towle D, Edmans JA, Lincoln NB. An evaluation of a group treatment programme for stroke patients with perceptual deficits. Int J Rehabil Res1990; 13: 328–335.
29.
Edmans JA, Lincoln NB. Treatment of visual perceptual deficits after stroke: single case studies on four patients with right hemiplegia. Br J Occup Ther1991; 54: 139–144.
30.
Hajek VE, Kates MH, Donnelly R, McGree S. The effect of visuo spatial training in patients with right hemisphere stroke. Can J Rehabil1993; 6; 175–186.
31.
Fanthome Y, Lincoln NB, Drummond AER, Walker MF, Edmans JA. The treatment of visual neglect using the transfer of training approach. Br J Occup Ther1995; 58: 14–16.
32.
Webster JS, Jones S, Blanton P, Gross R, Beissell GF, Wofford JD. Visual scanning training with stroke patients. Behav Ther1984; 15: 129–143.
33.
Gouvier WD, Cottan G, Webster JS, Beissel GF, Wofford JD. Behavioural interventions with stroke patients for improving wheelchair navigation. Int J Clin Neuropsychol1984; VI: 186–190.
34.
Juby LC, Lincoln NB, Berman P. The effect of a stroke rehabilitation unit on functional and psychological outcome: a randomised controlled trial. Cerebrovasc Dis1996; 6: 106–110.
35.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.Md State Med J1965; 61–63.
36.
Collin C, Wade DT, Davis S, Home V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud1988; 10: 61–63.
37.
Edmans JA, Webster J. The Edmans ADL index: validity and reliability. Disabil Rehabil1997; 19: 465–476.
38.
Lincoln NB, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients.Physiotherapy1979; 65: 48–51.
39.
Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P. The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin Rehabil1991; 5: 272–282.
40.
Nelson HE. The National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test manual. Windsor: NFER–Nelson, 1982.
41.
Beardsall L, Brayne C. Estimation of verbal intelligence in an elderly community: a prediction analysis using a shortened NART. Br J Clin Psychol1990; 29: 83–90.
42.
Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale Revised. Test manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1987.
43.
Benton AL., Hamsher K. de S. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Test manual. Iowa City, Iowa: AJA Associates, 1989.
44.
Shallice T., Evans ME. The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation. Cortex1978; 14: 294–303.
45.
Kertesz A, Ferro JM. Lesion size and location in ideomotor apraxia. Brain1984; 107: 921–933.
46.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand1983; 67: 361–370.
