This article proposes an adaptive connectionist model that implements an attributional account of cognitive dissonance. The model represents an attitude as the connection between the attitude object and behavioral-affective outcomes. Dissonance arises when circumstantial constraints induce a mismatch between the model's (mental) prediction and discrepant behavior or affect. Reduction of dissonance by attitude change is accomplished through long-lasting changes in the connection weights using the error-correcting delta learning algorithm. The model can explain both the typical effects predicted by dissonance theory as well as some atypical effects (i.e., reinforcement effect), using this principle of weight changes and by giving a prominent role to affective experiences. The model was implemented in a standard feedforward connectionist network. Computer simulations showed an adequate fit with several classical dissonance paradigms (inhibition, initiation, forced compliance, free choice, & misattribution), as well as novel studies that underscore the role of affect. A comparison with an earlier constraint satisfaction approach (Shultz & Lepper, 1996) indicates that the feedforward implementation provides a similar fit with these shortcomings of this previous model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allan, L. G. (1993). Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative?Psychological Bulletin, 114, 435-448
2.
Ans, B., & Rousset, S. (1997). Avoiding catastrophic forgetting by coupling two reverberating neural networks. Académie des Sciences de la vie, 320, 989-997
3.
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannebaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5-27). Chicago: Rand McNally.
4.
Beecher, H. K. (1955). The powerful placebo. Journal of the American Medical Association, 159, 1602-1606
5.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic.
6.
Betsch, T., Plessner, H., Schwieren, C., & Gütig, R. (2001). I like it but I don't know why: A value-account approach to implicit attitude formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 242-253
7.
Blanton, H., Cooper, J., Skurnik, I., & Aronson, J. (1997). When bad things happen to good feedback: Exacerbating the need for self-justification with self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 684-692
8.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148
9.
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decisional changes in the desirability of choice alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389
10.
Calder, B. J., Ross, M. & Insko, C. A. (1973). Attitude change and attitude attribution: effects of incentive, choice, and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 84-99
11.
Cleeremans, A., & French, R. M. (1996) From chicken squawking to cognition: Levels of description and the computational approach in psychology. Psychologica Belgica, 36, 5-30.
12.
Collins, B. E., & Hoyt, M. F. (1972). Personal responsibility-for-consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced compliance” literature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 558-593
13.
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimnental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229-266). New York: Academic.
14.
Cooper, J., Fazio, R. H., & Rhodewalt, F. (1978). Dissonance and humor: Evidence for the undifferentiated nature of dissonance arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 280-285
15.
Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67, 382-394
16.
Estes, W. K., Campbell, J. A., Hatsopoulos, N., & Hurwitz, J. B. (1989). Base-rate effects in category learning: A comparison of parallel network and memory storage-retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 556-571.
17.
Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
18.
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210
19.
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
Freedman, J. L. (1965). Long-term behavioral effects of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 145-155
21.
French, R. (1997). Pseudo-recurrent connectionist networks: An approach to the “sensitivity-stability” dilemma. Connection Science, 9, 353-379
22.
French, R. (1999). Catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 128-135
23.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41-80). New York: Academic.
24.
Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Gerard, H. B., & Mathewson, G. C. (1966). The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 278-287
26.
Glass, D. (1964). Changes in liking as a means of reducing cognitive discrepancies between self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 32, 531-549
27.
Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227-247
28.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (1999), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory int social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
Higgins, E. T., Rhodewalt, F., & Zanna, M. P. (1979). Dissonance motivation: Its nature, persistence, and reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 16-34
30.
Isen, A. M. (1984). Towards understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31.
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557-571
32.
Jones, E. E. (1985). Major developments in social psychology during the past five decades. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 47-108). New York: Random House.
33.
Jordens, K., & Van Overwalle, F. (2001). Een empirische toetsing van een feedforward connectionistisch model van cognitieve dissonantie: De rol van affect in het gefnduceerd-inwillingsparadigma [An empirical test of a feedforward connectionist model of cognitive dissonance: The role of affect in the induced compliance paradigm]. In D. A. Stapel, C. Martijn, E. van Dijk, & A. Dijksterhuis (Eds.), Fundamentele sociale psychologie (Vol. 15, pp. 91-102). Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
34.
Jordens, K., & Van Overwalle, F. (2002). Cognitive dissonance and affect: An empirical test of a connectionist account. Manuscript in preparation.
35.
Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1-26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
36.
Kidd, R. F., & Berkowitz, L. (1976). Effect of dissonance arousal on helpfulness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 613-622
37.
Linder, D. E., Cooper, J., & Jones, E. E. (1967). Decision freedom as a determinant of the role of incentive magnitude in attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 245-254
38.
Lord, C. G. (1992). Was cognitive dissonance theory a mistake?Psychological Inquiry, 3, 339-341
39.
Losch, M. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Cognitive dissonance may enhance sympathetic tonus, but attitudes are changes to reduce negative affect rather than arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 289-304
40.
McClelland, J., McNaughton, B., & O'Reilly, R. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and the failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457
41.
McClelland, J. M., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs and exercises. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
42.
McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 24, 109-165
43.
Mutate, H., Arcediano, F., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Test question modulates cue competition between causes and between effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 182-196
44.
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Ostrom, T. M., Skowronski, J. J., & Nowak, A. (1994). In P. G. Devine (Ed.), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology (pp. 195-251). San Diego, CA: Academic.
46.
Ratcliff, R. (1990). Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97, 285-308
47.
Read, S. J., & Marcus-Newhall, A. (1993) Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 429-447
48.
Read, S. J., & Montoya, J. A. (1999). An autoassociative model of causal reasoning and causal learning: Reply to Van Overwalle's critique of Read and Marcus-Newhall (1993). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 728-742
49.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-98). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
50.
Rhodewalt, F., & Comer, R. (1979). Induced-compliance attitude change: Once more with feeling. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 35-47
51.
Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 161-200
52.
Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective and behavioral components of attitudes. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 1-14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
Ross, M., & Olson, J. M. (1981). An expectancy attribution model of the effects of placebos. Psychological Review, 88, 408-437
54.
Sakai, H. (1999). A multiplicative power-function model of cognitive dissonance: Toward an integrated theory of cognition, emotion, and behavior after Leon Festinger. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behaviour (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.
56.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
57.
Shaffer, D. R. (1975). Some effects of consonant and dissonant attitudinal advocacy on initial salience and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 160-168.
58.
Shanks, D. R. (1991). Categorization by a connectionist network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 433-443.
59.
Shanks. D. R. (1993). Human instrumental learning: A critical review of data and theory. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 319-354.
60.
Sherman, S. J. (1970). Attitudinal effects of unforeseen consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 510-520.
61.
Shultz, T., & Lepper, M. (1996). Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. Psychological Review, 2, 219-240.
62.
Shultz, T. R., Léveillé, E. & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Free choice and cognitive dissonance revisited: Choosing “lesser evils” versus “greater goods.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 40-48.
63.
Simon, L., Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247-260.
64.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.
65.
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (1998). Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: Simulation with a recurrent connectionist network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 21-35.
66.
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Associative and rule-based processing: A connectionist interpretation of dual-process models. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 323-338). London: Guilford.
67.
Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913-933.
68.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego, CA: Academic.
69.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Lynch, M. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 885-896.
70.
Stone, J. (1999). What exactly have I done? The role of the self-attribute accessibility in dissonance. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in socialpsychology (pp. 175-200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
71.
Stone, J., & Cooper, J. (2001). A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 228-243.
72.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
Thibodeau, R., & Aronson, E. (1992). Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of the self-concept in dissonance theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 591-602.
74.
Totman, R. G. (1976). Cognitive dissonance and the placebo response. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 119-125.
75.
Van Overwalle, F. (1998) Causal explanation as constraint satisfaction: A critique and a feedforward connectionist alternative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 312-328.
76.
Van Overwalle, F., Labiouse, C., & French, R. (2001). Connectionist exploration in social cognition. Unpublished Manuscript.
77.
Van Overwalle, F., & Van Rooy, D. (1998). A connectionist approach to causal attribution. In S. J. Read & L. C. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior (pp. 142-171). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
78.
Van Overwalle, F., & Van Rooy, D. (2001a). When more observations are better than less: A connectionist account of the acquisition of causal strength. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 155-175
79.
Van Overwalle, F., & Van Rooy D. (2001b). How one cause discounts or augments another: A connectionist account of causal competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1613-1626.
80.
Van Rooy, D., Van Overwalle, F., Vanhoomissen, T., Labiouse, C., & French, R. (2002). A recurrent connectionist model of group biases. Manuscript submitted for publication.
81.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
82.
Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). Dissonance and the pill: An attributional approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 703-709.
83.
Zanna, M. P., Higgins, E. T., & Taves, P. A. (1976). Is dissonance phenomenologically aversive?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 530-538.
