Superiority of one of the methods depends upon the criteria selected, and the value of undergraduate TAs is clearly supported.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArbesB.KitchenerK. G.Faculty consultation: A study in support of education through student interaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1974, 21, 121–126.
2.
ChurchillR.JohnP.Conservation of teaching time through the use of lecture classes and student assistants. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1958, 49, 324–327.
3.
DiamondM. J.Improving the undergraduate lecture class by use of student-led discussion groups. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 978–981.
4.
DubinR.TaveggiaT. C.The teaching-learning paradox. Eugene, Oregon: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, 1968.
5.
HillW. F.Learning through discussion. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1969.
6.
KitchenerK. G.HurstJ. C.Faculty consultation: An emerging role for the counseling psychologist. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1974, 21, 127–132.
7.
MaasJ. B.PresslerV. M.The role of undergraduate teaching assistants in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology Newsletter, 1973 (March), 7–9.
8.
MaierN. R. F.Innovation in education. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 722–725.
9.
MaierN. R. F.ThurberJ. A.JanzenJ. C.Studies in creativity: The selection process in recall and problem-solving situations. Psychological Reports, 1968, 23, 1005–1022.
10.
VattanoF. J.HockenberryC.GriderW.JacobsonL.HamiltonS.Employing undergraduate students in the teaching of psychology. Teaching of Psychology Newsletter, 1973 (March), 9–12.
11.
VeryP. S.Real and ideal characteristics of the teacher-student relationship. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 27, 880–882.
12.
WrigleyC.Undergraduate students as teachers: Apprenticeship in the university classroomTeaching of Psychology Newsletter, 1973 (March), 5–7.
