Abstract
Balch (1989) reported that students scored higher on multiple-choice exams when item order was sequenced (S) than when it was random (R). To provide cross-validation and to determine whether test anxiety interacts with order formats, three experiments were conducted with a total of 253 introductory psychology students. In two experiments, students were randomly assigned S-or R-format tests. A third experiment used a within-subjects design and a two-part testing procedure with counterbalanced S and R formats. A significant Anxiety × Item Order interaction was detected in one experiment, but no evidence was found for superior performance on S-format tests in any of the three experiments. Concern with practical ramifications of Balch's findings may be unwarranted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
