This paper deals with problems involving the incorporation of safety into the design process of large marine and offshore engineering products from the initial stages. In this paper, the characteristics of large marine and offshore products are described and their design process is studied together with a proposed design framework. After investigating the current design for safety status of large marine and offshore products, a design for safety methodology is proposed in a generic sense and discussed in the context of the design process. The phases in the proposed design for safety methodology are studied together with their objectives and requirements. Finally, concluding remarks are given.
FinkelsteinL.FinkelsteinA. C. W.Review of design methodology. Proc. IEE, 1983, Part A, 130 (4), 213–221.
2.
ClelandG.KingB. J.A perspective of the conceptual design process for a large, complex made-to-order engineering artefact. J. Engng Des., 1983, 4 (1), 55–67.
ErtasA.JonesJ. G.The Engineering Design Process, 1993 (John Wiley, New York).
5.
WangJ.Formal safety analysis methods and their application to the design process. PhD thesis, Engineering Design Centre, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 1994.
6.
BS 1957: 1979Specification for Power-Driven Mobile Cranes (British Standards Institution, London).
7.
BS 327: 1964Specification for Power-Driven Mobile Cranes (British Standards Institution, London).
8.
SenP.LabrieC. R.WangJ.RuxtonT.ChanJ.A general design for safety framework for large made-to-order engineering products. Proceeding of First Newcastle International Conference onQuality and Its Applications, Newcastle, September 1993, pp. 499–505.
9.
Department of Energy. The Public Inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster (Cullen Report), 1990 (HMSO, London) (ISBN 0 101 1310 2).
10.
Health and Safety Executive. The Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 1992 (ISBN 0 011 88205 9).
11.
Health and Safety Executive. Prevention of Fire and Explosion, and Emergency Response Regulations1995 (ISBN 0 717 60874 3).
12.
The Offshore Installations and Wells (Design and Construction, etc.) Regulations 1996, No. 913 (HMSO, London) (ISBN 0 110 54451 X).
13.
Health and Safety Executive. A Guide to the Offshore Installations and Pipelines Works (Management and Administration) Regulations1995 (ISBN 0 717 60093 8).
14.
Health and Safety Executive. A Guide to the Pipeline Safety Regulations1996 (ISBN 0 717 61193 0).
15.
House of Lords. Safety aspects of ship design and technology, (Carver Report), Select Committee on Science and Technology, Second Report, HL paper 30-I, February 1992.
16.
Marine Safety Agency. Formal safety assessment MSC 66/14, submitted by the United Kingdom to IMO Maritime Safety Committee, 1993.
17.
HenleyE. J.KumamotoH.Probabilistic Risk Assessment, 1992 (IEEE Press, New York).
18.
SmithD. J.Reliability, Maintainability and Risk, 4th edition, 1992 (Butterworths—Heinemann Limited).
19.
VillemeurA.Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety Assessment, 1992 (John Wiley, Chichester).
20.
MIL-STD-1629A. Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis, Military Standard, Naval Ship Engineering Center, Washington DC.
21.
WangJ.RuxtonT.LabrieC. R.Design for safety of marine engineering systems with multiple failure state variables. Reliability Engng and Syst. Saf., 1995, 50 (3), 271–284.
22.
WangJ.YangJ. B.SenP.Safety analysis and synthesis using fuzzy set modelling and evidential reasoning. Reliability Engng and Syst. Saf., 1995, 47 (3), 110–118.
23.
WangJ.YangJ. B.SenP.Multi-person and multi-attribute design evaluations using evidential reasoning based on subjective safety and cost analyses. Reliability Engng and Syst. Saf., 1996, 52 (2), 113–128.
24.
HalebskyM.System safety engineering as applied to ship design. Marine Technol., July 1989, 26 (3), 245–251.
25.
WangJ.RuxtonT.A review of safety analysis methods applied to the design process of large engineering products. J. Engng Des., 1997, 8 (2), 131–152.
26.
WangJ.YangJ. B.SenP.RuxtonT.Safety based design and maintenance optimisation of large marine engineering systems. Appl. Ocean Res., 1996, 18 (1), 13–27.
27.
WangJ.A subjective methodology for safety analysis of safety requirements specifications. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 1997, 5 (3), 418–430.
