Abstract
Analytical expressions are proposed, from which the circumferential and longitudinal residual stresses present in a tube may be found by measurement of changes in curvature after slitting and layer removal. The effect of variation of the tube length, previously thought to be anomalous, is satisfactorily explained by the present analysis.
The methods of measuring residual stress which were proposed by Davidenkov, Sachs and Espey, and Treuting and Read, are examined in detail and are shown to be inaccurate in certain circumstances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Sachs
G.
Z. Metallk. 1927 19 , 9 .
2.
der Winkler
E.
. Civilingenieur 1958 4 , 232 .
3.
Loxley
E. M.
‘Residual stresses in cold drawn tubes’ , Ph.D. Thesis, Sheffield 1955 .
4.
Davidenkov
N.
Z. Metallk. 1932 24 , 25 .
5.
Sachs
G.
Espey
G.
Trans. Amer. Inst. min. Engrs 1942 147 , 74 , 348 .
6.
Treuting
R. G.
Read
W. F.
J. appl. Phys. 1951 22 (2 ), 130 .
7.
Knights
W. J.
‘Measurement of residual stresses in tubes’ , Ph.D. Thesis, London, 1952 .
8.
Lynch
J. J.
‘Measurement of residual stresses’ , Amer. Soc. Metals Symp. on Residual Stresses in Metals 1951 .
9.
Horger
D. J.
Residual stresses , Handbook, Soc. exp. Stress Anal. 1950 (Wiley ).
10.
Baldwin
W. M.
Proc. Amer. Soc. Test. Mater. 1949 49 , 539 .
11.
Ford
H.
Inst. Metals Symp. 1947 .
12.
Heindlhofer
K.
Evaluation of residual stress 1949 (McGraw-Hill ).
13.
Barrett
C. S.
Proc. Soc. exp. stress Anal. 1944 2 , 1 .
14.
Sachs
G.
Espey
G.
Clark
S. N.
Amer. Soc. Test Mater. , Amer. Inst. min. Engrs Joint Monograph 1944 .
15.
Crampton
D. K.
Trans. Amer. Inst. min. Engrs 1930 89 , 939 .
16.
Anderson
R. J.
Fahlman
E. G.
J. Inst. Metals 1925 34 , 271 .
17.
Hatfield
W. H.
Thirkell
G. L.
J. Inst. Metals 1919 22 , 67 .
