Abstract
The UK confidential maternal mortality enquiry shows that not only has maternal mortality decreased since 1952, the year of the first enquiry, but also the pattern of maternal mortality has changed markedly. Major surgical causes of death, such as post-partum haemorrhage and ruptured uterus, are no longer as important as medical causes such as heart disease. The ‘Top Ten’ recommendations in the current report for the years 2003–2005 emphasise the need for health care practitioners to be aware of the risks that medical conditions, both pre-existing and those arising de novo in pregnancy, impose on the expectant and newly delivered mother. Training and further education programmes should emphasise the importance of medical problems in pregnancy without omitting the knowledge and skills in basic obstetrics that have made such an impact on maternal mortality in the past.
INTRODUCTION
The confidential enquiries into maternal deaths first started in 1952 in England and Wales. Each publication reviewed maternal mortality over a three-year period and made recommendations in order to improve maternal care. Similar systems were introduced in Northern Ireland in 1956 and in Scotland in 1965. Since 1985 the data for all four countries in the United Kingdom have been pooled. The most recent report covers the years 2003–2005 and was published in 2007. 1 The enquiry is the longest running example of national self-evaluation in medicine in the world.
In 1952–1954, there were over 1400 maternal deaths in England and Wales alone and the most common causes of death were haemorrhage (234 deaths) and what was called ‘toxaemia,’ i.e. complications of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia (200 deaths). In 2003–2005, there were 295 deaths in the whole UK and the most common causes of death were heart disease (48 deaths) and thromboembolism (41 deaths). There were just 14 deaths from haemorrhage and 18 from pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Furthermore, since 1997–1999 there have been more indirect deaths than direct deaths. Indirect deaths are those resulting from previous existing disease or from disease (usually medical) that arise in pregnancy not directly due to obstetric causes but which are made worse by pregnancy. So not only has there been a marked reduction in maternal mortality since 1952, but there has also been a change in emphasis regarding conditions that give concern. These are no longer so much the traditional obstetric problems of postpartum haemorrhage, obstructed labour and eclampsia as the medical problems of heart disease and pulmonary embolus. All these comments apply only to the developed world. In the developing world, the picture is similar to that in England and Wales in 1952, or worse because of lack of education, resources and the presence of HIV/AIDS (see accompanying article by Lewis G).
The seventh report into maternal deaths in the UK (2003–2005) for the first time published a list of the top 10 recommendations – all of which could be audited. Those recommendations that are relevant to obstetric medicine (the majority) are discussed below with examples taken from the seventh report.
RECOMMENDATION 1
‘Pre-conception counselling and support, both opportunistic and planned, should be
provided for women of child-bearing age with pre-existing serious medical or
mental health conditions which may be aggravated by pregnancy. This includes
obesity. This recommendation especially applies to women prior to having assisted
reproduction and other fertility treatments.’
’A woman had chronic active hepatitis, which had caused acquired antithrombin
deficiency, which in turn had increased her thromboembolic risk sufficient to have
caused a previous pulmonary embolus. She also had oesophageal varices, ulcerative
colitis and had several previous miscarriages. She sought in
vitro fertilization and became pregnant again, which resulted in an
unexpected vaginal breech delivery. She had a postpartum haemorrhage and was
thought to have had a pulmonary embolus for which she was given thrombolysis. This
caused massive vaginal and generalized haemorrhage from which she died. The
autopsy confirmed pulmonary hypertension with characteristic changes in the heart
and lung vasculature. There was no acute pulmonary embolus, but it was thought
that the pulmonary hypertension was consequent to previous pulmonary
thromboembolic disease.’
Previous thromboembolism (VTE) is another condition where the clinicians looking after women with their index thrombosis do not consider what pregnancy might entail. But to do so they must know what are the relationships between pregnancy and previous VTE, and what can be done with regard to thromboprophylaxis. They must know that women with thrombophilia can die from pulmonary embolus within the first trimester. Women do not often book until the beginning of the second trimester. Therefore, to rely on the obstetric services to instigate thromboprophylaxis is inadequate. These women with previous VTE may die before they first meet the obstetric services. Many physicians responsible for the acute medical care of women with VTE are not confident with regard to obstetric medicine. Therefore, for this recommendation of improved prepregnancy counselling to be effective, the knowledge of obstetric medicine of all doctors caring for medical problems in women of child-bearing age must be improved.
RECOMMENDATIONS 2 AND 3
‘Maternity service providers should ensure that antenatal services are accessible
and welcoming so that all women, including those who currently find it difficult
to access maternity care, can reach them easily and earlier in their pregnancy.
Women should also have had their first full booking visit and hand held maternity
record completed by 12 completed weeks of pregnancy. Pregnant women who, on referral to maternity services, are already 12 or more
weeks pregnant should be seen within two weeks of the referral.’
‘A woman died from SUDEP (sudden unexplained death in epilepsy) in mid-pregnancy.
She had had epilepsy for many years but seizure control was unsatisfactory and she
had stopped taking anticonvulsants. Although she attended the antenatal clinic at
her general practitioner's (GP) surgery very early in pregnancy she was not able
to be fully ‘booked’ until four weeks later because the midwives were too busy.
Although she was referred to a neurologist she did not attend her appointment
because she did not receive the appointment letter. As she was having regular
fits, she was referred again to the neurologist, but the repeat appointment was
delayed by more than one month and she died before she could attend.’
RECOMMENDATION 4
‘All pregnant mothers from countries where women may experience poorer overall
general health, and who have not previously had a full medical examination in the
UK, should have a medical history taken and clinical assessment made of their
overall health, including a cardiovascular examination at booking, or as soon as
possible thereafter. This should be performed by an appropriately trained doctor,
who could be their usual GP.’ ‘A previously well, young immigrant woman, with little English, was booked for
midwifery led care and only ever saw her midwife or her GP. She was admitted to an
emergency department (ED) with cough, breathlessness and chest pain. She was
hypoxic and markedly tachycardic and, not unreasonably, the diagnosis was assumed
to be a pulmonary embolus. Her chest was clear and no murmur was heard. The
electrocardiogram showed P mitrale, suggesting an enlarged left atrium, but this
was missed. The echocardiogram was suggestive of only mild mitral stenosis, but
she had significant pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure 55 mmHg),
which should have raised concerns that the mitral stenosis was more severe, as was
diagnosed at autopsy. She died the following day.’
RECOMMENDATION 5
All pregnant women with a systolic blood pressure of 160 mmHg or more require
antihypertensive treatment. Consideration should also be given to initiating
treatment at lower pressures if the overall clinical picture suggests rapid
deterioration and/or where the development of severe hypertension can be
anticipated.
‘A woman who had a cerebral haemorrhage due to an aneurysm in mid-pregnancy had a
coil inserted as a closed procedure to block the feeder vessels and to prevent
further bleeding. Following an elective caesarean section, her blood pressure rose
to 190 mmHg systolic but she was allowed home. Shortly after she was re-admitted
with a further, fatal, intracerebral haemorrhage.’
RECOMMENDATIONS 8 AND 9
All clinical staff must undertake regular, written, documented and audited training for:
The identification, initial management and referral for serious medical and
mental health conditions which, although unrelated to pregnancy, may affect
pregnant women or recently delivered mothers; The early recognition and management of severely ill pregnant women and
impending maternal collapse; The improvement of basic, immediate and advanced life-support skills. A number
of courses provide additional training for staff caring for pregnant women and
newborn babies. There is also a need for staff to recognize their limitations and to know when,
how and whom to call for assistance.
Rationale
A lack of clinical knowledge and skills among some doctors, midwives and other
health professionals, senior or junior, was one of the leading causes of
potentially avoidable mortality. This triennium, the assessors were
particularly struck by the number of health-care professionals who failed to
identify and manage common medical conditions or potential emergencies outside
their immediate area of expertise. Resuscitation skills were also considered
poor in an unacceptably high number of cases. Early warning scoring system. There is an urgent need for the routine use of a
national obstetric early warning chart, similar to those in use in other areas
of clinical practice, which can be used for all obstetric women which will help
in the more timely recognition, treatment and referral of women who have, or
are developing, a critical illness. In the meantime, all Trusts should adopt
one of the existing modified early obstetric warning scoring systems of the
type described in the Chapter on Critical Care, which will help in the more
timely recognition of woman who have, or are developing, a critical illness. It
is important these charts are also used for pregnant women being cared for
outside the obstetric setting for example in gynaecology, EDs and in Critical
Care.
‘A woman who spoke little English was admitted with breathlessness in late
pregnancy. Despite clear documentation from the midwife on admission that she
was ‘unable to lie down for abdominal palpation’, both the obstetric and
medical registrars, and a locum consultant obstetrician, missed the symptoms
and signs of heart failure. Her ‘wheezing’ was taken to be asthma or possibly
due to pulmonary embolism. She was left on the antenatal ward, tachypnoeic and
tachycardic, and the severity of her illness was not appreciated. The diagnosis
of peripartum cardiomyopathy was not made until she was on the Critical Care
unit after having sustained a cardiac arrest and a perimortem caesarean
section.‘
CONCLUSION
We have considered seven of the 10 key recommendations from ‘Saving Mothers’ Lives. The Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths 2003–2005'. They highlight the need for all those caring for pregnant women to appreciate the medical aspects of maternity care. Huge advances have been made in reducing maternal mortality from traditional obstetric causes. It is now time to pay more attention to the medical problems of pregnancy. Although the situation will be improved by training more physicians (internists) in the medical problems of pregnancy, there will never be enough of these physicians to provide all the medical care that is needed. Those responsible for the obstetric care of pregnant women, (midwives, GPs and obstetricians) must be more aware of (and receive training in) the significance of medical conditions; both to treat sick pregnant women with a medical problem and to recognize when they should be referred to a physician.
