Numerical computations are carried out for the NREL S809 airfoil. The flow is modelled using an unsteady incompressible Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes solver. Two turbulence models (SST k/ω of Menter and RNG k/ε) are applied to close the RANS equations. All computations are performed assuming fully turbulent flow. The flow field is analyzed at various angles of attack from 0 to 20 degrees. Lift and drag forces are obtained from the computations by integrating the pressure and shear stress over the blade surface. The performance of the two turbulence models is compared and the influence of the free stream turbulence intensity is checked. The results confirm the satisfactory performance of the SST k/ω model of Menter for modelling turbulent flow around airfoils.
ZhangS.YuanX.YeD., Analysis of turbulent separated flows for the NREL airfoil using anisotropic two-equation models at higher angles of attack, Wind Engineering, 2001, Vol. 25, pp. 41–53.
Le PapeA.LecanuJ., 3D Navier-Stokes Computations of a Stall-regulated Wind Turbine, Wind Energy, 2004, Vol. 7, pp. 309–324.
7.
HuyerS. A.SimmsD.RobinsonM. C., Unsteady aerodynamics associated with horizontal–axis wind turbine, AIAA Journal, 1996, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 1410–1419.
8.
RobinsonM. C.HandM. M.SimmsD. A.SchreckS. J., Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamics: Three-Dimensional, Unsteady and separated Flow Influences, 3rd ASME/JSME joint Fluids Energy Conference, July 1999, NREL/CP-500-26337.
9.
DuZ.SeligM. S., The effect of rotation on the boundary layer of a wind turbine blade, Renewable Energy, 2000, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 167–181.
10.
HuD.HuaO.DuZ., A study on stall-delay for horizontal axis wind turbine, Renewable Energy, 2006, Vol. 31, pp. 821–836.
11.
ChaviaropoulosP. K.HansenM. O. L., Investigating Three-Dimensional and Rotational Effects on Wind Turbine Blades by Means of a Quasi-3D Navier-Stokes Solver, ASME J. Fluids Engineering, 2000, Vol. 122, pp. 330–336.
12.
AhnK. H., Performance of Renormalization Group algebraic turbulence model on boundary layer transition simulation, NASA CR-194466, 1994.
13.
SheltonA.AbrasJ.HathawayB.Sanchez-RochaM.SmithM. J.MenonS., An investigation of the numerical prediction of static and dynamic stall, American Helicopter Society 61st forum, Grapevine, TX, June 1–32005 (www.ccl.gatech.edu/papers/files/AHS-Stall-Final.pdf).
14.
MellenC. P.FrölichJ.RodiW., Lessons from LESFOIL project on Large-Eddy Simulation of flow around an airfoil, AIAA Journal, 2003, Vol. 41, pp. 573–581.
15.
Kotapati-ApparaoR. B.SquiresK. D.ForsytheJ. R., Prediction of the flow over an airfoil at maximum lift, AIAA paper 2004–0259.
16.
JohansenJ.SorensenN. N.MichelsenJ. A.ShreckS., Detached-Eddy Simulation of flow around the NREL phase VI blade, Wind Energy, 2002, Vol. 5, pp. 185–197.
17.
IssaR. I., Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator - splitting, J. Comp. Physics, 1986, Vol.62, pp. 40–65.
18.
MenterF. R., Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA Journal, 1994, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1598–1605.
19.
KralL. D., Recent experience with different turbulence models applied to the calculation of flow over aircraft components, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1998, Vol. 34, pp. 481–541.
20.
CatalanoP.AmatoM., An evaluation of RANS turbulence modeling for aerodynamic applications, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2003, Vol. 7, pp. 493–509.
21.
TulapurkaraE. G., Turbulence models for the computation of flow past airplanes, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1997, Vol. 33, pp. 71–165.
22.
GuilmineauE.PiquetJ.QuenteyP., 2D Turbulent viscous flow simulation past airfoil at fixed incidence, Computers and Fluids, 1997, Vol. 26, pp. 135–162.
23.
SorensenN. N.MichelsenJ. A., Drag prediction for blades at high angle of attack using CFD, ASME J. Solar Energy Engineering, 2004, Vol. 126, pp. 1011–1016.
24.
SorensenN. N.MichelsenJ. A.SchreckS., Navier-Stokes Predictions of the NREL Phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80ft x 120 ft wind tunnel, Wind Energy, 2002, Vol. 5, pp. 151–169.
25.
YakhotV.OrszagS. A., Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulence. I. Basic Theory, J. Sci. Comput., 1986, Vol. 1, pp. 3–51.
26.
GatskiT. B., Prediction of Airfoil Characteristics with higher order turbulence models, 1996, NASA 96-TM-110246.
27.
SwalwellK. E.SheridanJ.MelbourneW. H., The effect of turbulence intensity on stall of the NACA 0021 aerofoil, Proceedings of the 14th Australian fluid mechanics conference, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia, 10–14 December 2001, ed. DallyB.B.,
28.
HirschC.Numerical computation of internal and external flows. Vol. 1 Fundamentals of numerical discretization. Wiley interscience series in numerical methods in engineering, 1994.
29.
HanjalicK., Closure Models for incompressible turbulent flows (lecture series). BeeckJ.P.A.J.BenocciC. (eds) Introduction to turbulence modelling, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium, pp. 1–75, 2004. (www.vki.ac.be/educat/lect-ser/2004/turbulence2004/hanjalic.pdf).
