Using agent-based modelling, this paper established an adaptive simulation model of China's wholesale electricity market with endogenous investment decisions and technical progress. The model took into account the heterogeneities of power generators, including emission reduction attitudes and risk appetites. Using this model, we simulated how carbon tax and feed-in tariff (FIT) policies will affect each single generator in terms of market behaviours (price bidding and investment) to explore the evolution of power generating portfolio and emissions differently in the time horizon 2010–2050. The validity of the model was tested according to China's electricity market data. We found that FIT for wind power and solar power will crowd out the investment in gas power and nuclear power, rather than replacing coal power. Compared to FIT, carbon tax is a more effective tool for emission abatement and incentivize multiple low carbon generating technologies. And optimal rate of carbon tax should be no more than 250 CNY/t CO2.
BonacinaM.GulliF., Electricity pricing under “carbon emissions trading”: A dominant firm with competitive fringe model, Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8), 4200–4220
4.
Chernyavs'kaL.GullìF., Marginal CO2 cost pass-through under imperfect competition in power markets, Ecological Economics, 2008, 68(1–2), 408–421
5.
KimW.ChattopadhyayD., and ParkJ., Impact of carbon cost on wholesale electricity price: A note on price pass-through issues, Energy, 2010, 35(8), 3441–3448
6.
SijmJ.ChenY.HobbsB.F., The impact of power market structure on CO2 cost pass-through to electricity prices under quantity competition – A theoretical approach, Energy Economics, 2012, 34(4), 1143–1152
7.
FellH, EU-ETS and Nordic Electricity – A CVAR Analysis. Discussion Paper, 2008, Resources of the Future, Washington.
8.
HoffmannV.H., EU ETS and investment decisions: The case of the German electricity sector, European Management Journal, 2007, 25(6), 464–474.
9.
LaurikkaH., Option value of gasification technology within an emissions trading scheme, Energy Policy, 2006, 34(18), 3916–3928.
10.
AbadieL.M.ChamorroJ.M., European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments, Energy Economics, 2008, 30(6), 2992–3015.
11.
KlingelhöferH.E., Investments in EOP-technologies and emissions trading: Results from a linear programming approach and sensitivity analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(1), 370–383.
12.
StreimikieneD., The impact of international GHG trading regimes on penetration of new energy technologies and feasibility to implement EU Energy and Climate Package targets, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16, 2172–2177.
13.
LiuG.Z.WenF.S.XueS.S., The impact of emission trading and renewable energy standard on electricity market, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2010, 34 (7), 22–25.
14.
LevinT.ThomasV.M.LeeA.J., State-scale evaluation of renewable electricity policy: The role of renewable electricity credits and carbon taxes, Energy Policy, 2011, 39, 950–960.
15.
ChappinE.J.L.DijkemaG.P.J., On the impact of CO2 emission-trading on power generation emissions, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2009, 76(3), 358–370.
16.
PahleM.FanL.SchillW.P., How emission certificate allocations distort fossil investments: The German example, Energy Policy, 2011, 39(4), 1975–1987
17.
MarksR., Market design using agent-based models. In: TesfatsionLeighJuddKenneth L. (Eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics 2, Elsevier, 2006, 1339–1380.
18.
WeidlichA.VeitDaniel, A critical survey of agent-based wholesale electricity market models, Energy Economics, 2008, 30, 1728–1759.
19.
Banal-EstañolA.MicolaA.R., Behavioural simulations in spot electricity markets, European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 214, 147–159
20.
AzadehASkandariMMaleki-ShojaB, An integrated ant colony optimization approach to compare strategies of clearing price in electricity markets: Agent-based simulation, Energy Policy, 2010, 38(10), 6307–19.
21.
SarcaKKumbaroğluG.OrI., Modeling and Analysis of a Decentralized Electricity Market: An Integrated Simulation/Optimization Approach, Energy, 2012, 44(1), 830–52.
22.
NicolaisenJ., Petrov, Valentin, Tesfatsion, Leigh, Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2001, 5 (5), 504–523.
23.
BowerJ.BunnDerek W., Model-based comparisons of pool and bilateral markets for electricity, Energy Journal, 2000, 21 (3).
24.
BowerJ.BunnDerek W., Experimental analysis of the efficiency of uniform price versus discriminatory auctions in the England and Wales electricity market, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2001, 25 (3–4), 561–592.
25.
Banal-EstañolA.Rupérez MicolaAugusto, Composition of electricity generation portfolios, pivotal dynamics and market prices, Management Science, 2009, 55 (11), 1813–1831.
26.
CincottiS.GuerciE.RabertoM., Price dynamics and market power in an agent-based power exchange, In: AbbottD.BouchaudJ.-P.GabaixX.McCauleyJ.-L. (Eds.): Noise and Fluctuations in Econophysics and Finance, Proceedings of the SPIE, 2005, vol. 5848, 233–240.
27.
DayC.BunnDerek, Divestiture of generation assets in the electricity pool of England and Wales: A computational approach to analyzing market power, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2001, 19 (2), 123–141.
28.
BunnD.W.DayChristopher J., Computational modelling of price formation in the electricity pool of England and Wales, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2009, 33, 363–376.
29.
BunnD.OliveiraFernando, Agent-based analysis of technological diversification and specialisation in electricity markets, European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 181 (3), 1265–1278.
30.
BunnD.FernandoOliveira, Modelling the impact of market interventions on the strategic evolution of electricity markets, Operations Research, 2008, 56 (5), 1116–1130
31.
BagnallA.SmithG., A multi-agent model of the UK market in electricity generation, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2005, 9 (5), 522–536.
32.
BunnD.W.MartocciaMaria., Unilateral and collusive market power in the electricity pool of England and Wales, Energy Economics, 2005, 27 (2), 305–315.
33.
Rupérez MicolaA.BunnDerek W., Crossholdings, information and prices in capacity constrained sealed bid-offer auctions, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2008, 66 (3–4), 748–766.
34.
BowerJ.BunnD.W.WattendrupC., A model-based analysis of strategic consolidation in the German electricity industry, Energy Policy, 2001, 29(12), 987–1005
35.
CramtonP., Competitive Bidding Behavior in Uniform-Price Auction Markets, Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004.
36.
ArgoteL.EppleD., Learning Curves in Manufacturing, Science, 1990, 247, 920–924
National Development and Reform Commission, National benchmark feed-in tariff for wind power, 2009.
39.
National Development and Reform Commission, Notice of improving the policy of feed-in tariff for solar photovoltaic electricity, 2011.
40.
NelsonT.KelleyS.OrtonF., A literature review of economic studies on carbon pricing and Australian wholesale electricity markets. Energy Policy, 2012, 49, 217–224.
41.
National Bureau of Statistics of China, Chinese Energy Statistical Yearbook 2011, 2011.
42.
McDonaldA.SchrattenholzerL., Learning rates for energy technologies, Energy Policy, 2001, 29, 255–261.
43.
National Development and Reform Commission, China's Renewable Energy Development Strategy and Policy Research, 2004, http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/.
44.
Chinese Academy of Engineering, medium-and long-term energy development strategy research, 2004.
45.
China Electricity Council, China's new energy development research report, 2012.
