In this paper, a finite element (FE) model for a cable-stayed bridge designed according to Australian standards is developed and analysed statically and dynamically with and without geometrical nonlinearities. The dynamic amplification factor (DAF) and demand-to-capacity ratio (DCR) in different structural components including cables, towers and the deck are calculated and it is shown that DCR usually remains below one (no material nonlinearity occurs) in the scenarios studied for the bridge under investigation, however, DAF can take values larger than two. Moreover, effects of location, duration and number of cable(s) loss as well as effect of damping level on the progressive collapse resistance of the bridge are studied and importance of each factor on the potential progressive collapse response of the bridgeis investigated.
ANSYS® (2009). Help System, Coupled Field Analysis Guide. I. ANSYS, ANSYS® Academic Research.
3.
AokiY.SamaliB.SalehA. and ValipourH. (2011). “Impact of sudden failure of cables on the dynamic performance of a cable-stayed bridge”, Austroads 8th Bridge Conference, Sydney, Australia, Vol. 2, pp. 310–321.
4.
AokiY.SamaliB.SalehA. and ValipourH. (2012). “Assement of Key Response Quantities for Design of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Subjected to Sudden Loss of Cable(s)”, Proceeding pf the Australasian Conference on The Mechanics of Structures and Matreials, ASMCM 22, pp.387–392Sydney, Australia.
5.
ARUP (2010). Stoncecutters Bridge Hong Kong Design and Construction, Ove Arup and Partners Hong Kong Ltd, Hong Kong, China.
6.
AS5100.2 (2004). Bridge Design – Part 2: Design Load, Design Loads, Australian Standard, Sydney, Australia.
7.
AS5100.6 (2004). Bridge Design – Steel and Composite Construction, Australian Standard, Sydney, Australia.
8.
BatheK.J. (1996). Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall, New Jerset, USA.
9.
CloughR.W. and PenzienJ. (1993). Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
10.
DoD (2005). UFC 4-023-03. Design of Structures to Resist Progressive Collapse, Department of Defence, Washington, DC, USA.
11.
GSA (2003). Progressive Collapse Design Guidelines. Applied to Concrete Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings, General Services Administration, Tennessee, USA.
12.
HaoH. and TangE.K.C. (2010). “Numerical simulation of a cable-stayed bridge response to blast loads, Part II: Damage prediction and FRP strengthening”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 3193–3205.
13.
JSCE (1990). Cable-Stayed Steel Bridges, Japan Society of Civil Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
14.
MozosC.M. and AparicioA.C. (2010). “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part I: Bending moment acting on the deck”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 3288–3300.
15.
MozosC.M. and AparicioA.C. (2010). “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part II: Bending moment acting on the pylons and stress on the stays”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 3301–3312.
16.
PTI (2007). Recommendations for Stay Cable Design, Testing and Installation, Post-Tensioning Institute, USA.
17.
Ruiz-TeranA.M. and AparicioA.C. (2007). “Dynamic amplification factors in cable-stayed structures”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 200, No. 1–2, pp. 197–216.
18.
SaadeghvaziriM.A. and Yazdani-MotlaghA.R. (2008). “Seismic behavior and capacity/demand analyses of three multi-span simply supported bridges”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 54–66.
19.
SonJ. and LeeH.J. (2011). “Performance of cable-stayed bridge pylons subjected to blast loading”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1133–1148.
20.
StarossekU. (2011). Progressive Collapse and Bridge Dynamics, National Scientific Seminar on Dynamics and Progressive Collapse in Cable-Stayed Bridges, Hanoi, Vietnam.
21.
TangE.K.C. and HaoH. (2010). “Numerical simulation of a cable-stayed bridge response to blast loads, Part I: Model development and response calculations”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 3180–3192.
22.
WaltherR. (1999). Cable Stayed Bridges, Thomas Telford, London, UK.
23.
WangP.H.TsengT.C. and YangC.G. (1993). “Initial shape of cable-stayed bridges”, Computers & Structures, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1095–1106.
24.
WangY.C. (2011). “Performance based fire engineering research of steel and composite structures: A review of joint behaviour”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 613–624.
25.
WolffM. and StarossekU. (2009). “Cable loss and progressive collapse in cable-stayed bridges”, Bridge Structures, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 17–28.
26.
WolffM. and StarossekU. (2010). “Cable-loss analyses and collapse behavior of cable-stayed bridges”, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Philadelphia, USA.
27.
YangD.C.GeY.J.XiangH.F. and MaZ.G. (2011). “3D flutter analysis of cable supported bridges including aeroelastic effects of cables”, Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 1129–1147.
28.
ZoliT. and WoodwardR. (2005). “Design of long span bridges for cable loss”, IABSE Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal.
