Raman Imaging of Heterogeneous Polymers: A Comparison of Global versus Point Illumination

Abstract

Two alternative methods of Raman imaging, via global (wide-field) illumination and via point illumination in combination with confocal light collection, have been applied to the study of heterogeneous polymer systems. From the results obtained it becomes apparent that the fluorescence inherent to most polymer systems severely limits the use of global illumination. Furthermore, the lack in depth resolution in Raman imaging by global illumination ruled out this method for the study of bulk polymer samples. Also as a consequence of the absence of depth resolution, the global illumination technique appeared more vulnerable to artifacts arising from scattering effects due to the sample geometry and fluorescence. Hence, for a general application of Raman imaging to the study of polymer samples, Raman imaging by point illumination in conjunction with confocal light collection is the method of choice

Keywords

Raman imaging Polymer blends Composites

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Painter

and Coleman

, and Koenig

, The Theory of Vibrational Spectroscopy and its Applicaton to Polymeric Systems (John Wiley, New York 1982).

Siesler

and Holland-Moritz

, Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy of Polymers (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1980).

Bower

and Maddams

, The Vibrational Spectroscopy of Polymers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).

Delhaye

and Dhamelincourt

, J. Raman Spectrosc. 3, 33 (1975).

Tabaksblat

and Meier

, and Kip

, Appl. Spectrosc, 46, 60 (1992).

Etz

and Blaha

, National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 533 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1980), p. 153.

Puppels

de Mul

Otto

Greve

Robert-Nicoud

and Arndt-Jovin

, and Jovin

, Nature 347, 301 (1990).

Meier

and Kip

, Microbeam Anal. 3, 61 (1994).

Markwort

and Kip

B. J.

, paper to be submitted for publication.

10.

Barbillat

Dhamelincourt

and Delhaye

, and Da Silva

, J. Raman Spectrosc. 25, 3 (1994).

11.

Barbillat

Da Silva

Delhaye

Dhamelincourt

and Manfait

, and Roussel

, in Proceedings of the XIIIth ICORS, Kiefer

, Ed. (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1992), p. 1074.

12.

Delhaye

and Da Silva

, and Barbillat

, European Patent #92400141.5 (1992).

13.

Nabiev

Sharonov

Chourpa

Feofanov

and Valisa

, and Manfait

, J. Raman Spectrosc. 25, 699 (1994).

14.

Batchelder

and Cheng

, and Pitt

, Adv. Mater. 3/11, 566 (1991).

15.

Batchelder

Smith

and Webster

, and Cheng

, in Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meetings of MAS, Bailey

, Ed. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, (1992), p. 1512.

16.

Puppels

and Grond

, and Greve

, Appl. Spectrosc. 47, 1256 (1993).

17.

Boogh

Meier

and Kausch

, and Kip

, J. Polym. Sci. B30, 325 (1992).

18.

Dilor

S.A.

, French Patent #FR 9404962 (1994).

19.

Cheng

and Summers

, in Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Pawley

, Ed. (Plenum Press, New York/London, 1990), Chap. 17, p. 179.

20.

Wilson

, Confocal Microscopy (Academic Press, London, 1990).

21.

Stein

, “Optical Behaviour of Polymer Blends”, in Polymer Blends: Volume I, Paul

and Newman

, Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1978), Chap. 9, p. 393.

22.

Wopenka

and Pasteris

, Anal. Chem. 59, 2165 (1987).

23.

Treado

and Morris

, Spectrochim. Acta Rev. 13, 355 (1990).