Innovation scholars have long touted the value of cross-functional teams, and though firms have embraced a cross-functional design in their new product development (NPD) teams, these teams continue to face challenges. Stability in an NPD team may offer important advantages for decision making; however, its effectiveness as a structural coordination mechanism remains largely unexplored. Therefore, to offer insight into the value of NPD team stability, the authors develop a process-based model that examines the extent to which stability influences certain decision-making processes, which in turn influence new product advantage. They examine these relationships with a sample of cross-functional NPD project teams from 208 high-technology firms. The results reveal that the degree of stability in an NPD project team has a curvilinear relationship to team-level debate and decision-making comprehensiveness. In turn, whereas debate is positively related to decision comprehensiveness, decision comprehensiveness is positively related to new product advantage only at high levels. These curvilinear patterns shed light on anecdotal evidence that currently attributes success to both stable and unstable project teams.
AkgünAli E., ByrneJohn, KeskinHalit, LynnGary S., and ImamogluSalih Z. (2005), “Knowledge Networks in New Product Development Projects: A Transactive Memory Perspective,”Information & Management, 42 (8), 1105–1120.
2.
AkgünAli E., and LynnGary S. (2002), “Antecedents and Consequences of Team Stability on New Product Development Performance,”Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19 (3-4), 263–86.
3.
AkgünAli E., LynnGary S., and ByrneJohn C. (2006), “Antecedents and Consequences of Unlearning in New Product Development Teams,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (1), 73–88.
4.
AmasonAllen C. (1996), “Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams,”Academy of Management Journal, 39 (1), 123–48.
5.
ArgoteLinda, and IngramPaul (2000), “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 (1), 150–69.
6.
Atuahene-GimaKwaku (2003), “The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter?”Academy of Management Journal, 46 (3), 359–73.
7.
Atuahene-GimaKwaku, and EvangelistaFelicitas (2000), “Cross-Functional Influence in New Product Development: An Exploratory Study of Marketing and R&D Perspectives,”Management Science, 46 (10), 1269–84.
8.
Atuahene-GimaKwaku, and LiHaiyang (2004), “Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness and New Product Development Outcomes in New Technology Ventures,”Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4), 583–97.
9.
BeanAlden S. (1995), “Why Some R&D Organizations Are More Productive Than Others,”Research-Technology Management, 38 (1), 25–29.
10.
BourgeoisL.J., and EisenhardtKathleen M. (1988), “Strategic Decision Process in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry,”Management Science, 34 (7), 816–35.
11.
BrownShona L., and EisenhardtKathleen M. (1995), “Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions,”Academy of Management Review, 20 (2), 343–78.
12.
CarleyKathleen (1986), “Knowledge Acquisition as a Social Phenomenon,”Instructional Science, 14 (3), 381–438.
13.
CarleyKathleen (1991), “A Theory of Group Stability,”American Sociological Review, 56 (3), 331–54.
14.
CarlilePaul R. (2002), “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development,”Organization Science, 13 (4), 442–55.
15.
De LucaLuigi M., and Atuahene-GimaKwaku (2007), “Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 71 (January), 95–112.
16.
DeanJames W., and SharfmanMark P. (1996), “Does Decision Process Matter? A Study of Strategic Decision-Making Effectiveness,”Academy of Management Journal, 39 (2), 368–96.
17.
DooleyRobert S., and FryxellGerald E. (1999), “Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment from Dissent: The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams,”Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), 389–402.
18.
DoughertyDeborah (1992), “Interpretative Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms,”Organization Science, 3 (2), 179–202.
19.
EfronB., and TibshiraniR.J. (1993), An Introduction to the Bootstrap.New York: Chapman & Hall.
20.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1989), “Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments,”Academy of Management Journal, 32 (3), 543–76.
21.
EsserJames K. (1998), “Alive and Well After 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73 (2-3), 116–41.
22.
FornellClaes, and BooksteinFred L. (1982), “Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (November), 440–52.
23.
FornellClaes, and LarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 39–50.
24.
FredricksonJames W. (1984), “The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes: Extension, Observations, Future Directions,”Academy of Management Journal, 27 (3), 445–66.
25.
FredricksonJames W., and MitchellTerence R. (1984), “Strategic Decision Processes: Comprehensiveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable Environment,”Academy of Management Journal, 27 (2), 399–423.
26.
GrantRobert M. (1996), “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,”Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1), 109–122.
27.
GriffinAbbie, and HauserJohn R. (1992), “Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering, and Manufacturing: A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams,”Management Science, 38 (3), 360–73.
28.
HansenMorten T. (1999), “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1), 82–111.
29.
HullandJohn (1999), “Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies,”Strategic Management Journal, 20 (2), 195–204.
JehnKaren A. (1995), “A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (2), 256–82.
32.
JessupLeonard M., and TansikDavid A. (1991), “Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System,”Decision Sciences, 22 (2), 266–79.
33.
KatzRalph (1982), “The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (1), 81–104.
34.
LaFastoFrank M.J., and LarsonCarl (2001), When Teams Work Best.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
LaveJ. (1988), Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LeonardDorothy, and SensiperSylvia (1998), “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation,”California Management Review, 40 (3), 112–32.
37.
LewisKyle (2004), “Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems,”Management Science, 50 (11), 1519–33.
38.
LewisKyle, LangeDonald, and GillisLynette (2005), “Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer,”Organization Science, 16 (6), 581–98.
39.
LuoXueming, SlotegraafRebecca J., and PanXing (2006), “Cross-Functional ‘Coopetition’: The Simultaneous Role of Cooperation and Competition Within Firms,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (April), 67–80.
40.
MaltzEliot, and KohliAjay K. (1996), “Market Intelligence Dissemination Across Functional Boundaries,”Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (February), 47–61.
41.
McGrathJoseph E. (1984), Groups: Interaction and Performance.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
McGrathJoseph E., and KellyJ.R. (1986), Time and Human Interaction: Toward a Social Psychology of Time.New York: Guilford.
43.
MillerC. Chet (2008), “Decisional Comprehensiveness and Firm Performance: Towards a More Complete Understanding,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21 (5), 598–620.
44.
MillerC. Chet, BurkeLinda M., and GlickWilliam H. (1998), “Cognitive Diversity Among Upper-Echelon Executives: Implications for Strategic Decision Processes,”Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1), 39–58.
45.
MillerC. Chet, CardinalLaura B., and GlickWilliam H. (1997), “Retrospective Reports in Organizational Research,”Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1), 189–204.
46.
MillerDanny, DrogeCornelia, and ToulouseJean-Marie (1988), “Strategy Process and Content as Mediators Between Organizational Context and Structure,”Academy of Management Journal, 31 (3), 544–69.
47.
MitchellRebecca, NicholasStephen, and BoyleBrendan (2009), “The Role of Openness to Cognitive Diversity and Group Processes in Knowledge Creation,”Small Group Research, 40 (5), 535–54.
48.
Montoya-WeissMitzi M., MasseyAnne P., and SongMichael (2001), “Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams,”Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6), 1251–62.
49.
MoormanChristine (1995), “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 318–35.
50.
MorelandRichard L., and ArgoteLinda (2003), “Transactive Memory in Dynamic Organizations,” in Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization, PetersonR.S., and MannixE.A., eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3–31.
51.
MurphyKevin R., and MyorsBrett (2004), Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52.
NisbettRichard E., ZukierHenry, and LemleyRonald E. (1981), “The Dilution Effect: Nondiagnostic Information Weakens the Implications of Diagnostic Information,”Cognitive Psychology, 13 (2), 248–77.
53.
NonakaIkujiro (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,”Organization Science, 5 (1), 14–37.
54.
NunnallyJum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
55.
PelledLisa H., EisenhardtKathleen M., and XinKatherine R. (1999), “Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1), 1–28.
56.
PingRobert A. (1995), “A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 336–47.
57.
PodsakoffPhilip M., MacKenzieScott B., LeeJ., and PodsakoffNathan P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
58.
RodanSimon, and GalunicCharles (2004), “More Than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness,”Strategic Management Journal, 25 (6), 541–62.
59.
RustRoland T., ThompsonDebora V., and HamiltonRebecca W. (2006), “Defeating Feature Fatigue,”Harvard Business Review, 84 (2), 98–107.
60.
SchweigerDavid M., SandbergWilliam R., and RaganJames W. (1986), “Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus,”Academy of Management Journal, 29 (1), 51–71.
61.
SethiRajesh, SmithDaniel C., and ParkC.W. (2001), “Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (February), 73–85.
62.
SheremataWillow A. (2000), “Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure,”Academy of Management Review, 25 (2), 389–408.
63.
SimonsTony, PelledLisa H., and SmithKen A. (1999), “Making Use of Difference: Diversity, Debate, and Decision Comprehensiveness in Top Management Teams,”Academy of Management Journal, 42 (6), 662–73.
64.
SniezekJanet A. (1992), “Groups Under Uncertainty: An Examination of Confidence in Group Decision Making,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52 (1), 124–55.
65.
StasserGarold, and StewartDennis (1992), “Discovery of Hidden Profiles by Decision-Making Groups: Solving a Problem Versus Making a Judgment,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (3), 426–34.
66.
SzulanskiGabriel (1996), “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm,”Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 17–43.
67.
SzulanskiGabriel (2000), “The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 (1), 9–27.
68.
TalaulicarTill, GrundeiJens, and MerderAxel v. (2005), “Strategic Decision Making in Start-Ups: The Effect of Top Management Team Organization and Processes on Speed and Comprehensiveness,”Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (4), 519–41.
69.
TuckmanBruce (1965), “Developmental Sequence in Small Groups,”Psychological Bulletin, 63 (6), 384–99.
70.
WhiteSteven (2000), “Competition, Capabilities, and the Make, Buy, or Ally Decisions of Chinese State-Owned Firms,”Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3), 324–41.
71.
WoldHerman (1985), “Partial Least Squares,” in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 6, KotzS., and JohnsonN.L., eds. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 581–91.
