Consumers incorrectly rely on their sense of understanding of what a company does to evaluate investment risk. In three correlational studies, greater sense of understanding was associated with lower risk ratings (Study 1) and with prediction distributions of future stock performance that had lower standard deviations and higher means (Studies 2 and 3). In all studies, sense of understanding was unassociated with objective risk measures. Risk perceptions increased when the authors degraded sense of understanding by presenting company information in an unstructured versus structured format (Study 4). Sense of understanding also influenced downstream investment decisions. In a portfolio construction task, both novices and seasoned investors allocated more money to hard-to-understand companies for a risk-tolerant client relative to a risk-averse one (Study 5). Study 3 ruled out an alternative explanation based on familiarity. The results may explain both the enduring popularity and common misinterpretation of the “invest in what you know” philosophy.
AksoyLerzan, CooilBruce, GroeningChristopher, KeininghamTimothy L., and YalcinAtakan (2008), “The Long-Term Stock Market Valuation of Customer Satisfaction,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (4), 105–22.
2.
AlbaJoseph W., and HutchinsonJ. Wesley (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (4), 411–54.
3.
AlbaJoseph W., and HutchinsonJ. Wesley (2000), “Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (2), 123–56.
4.
AlterAdam L., and OppenheimerDaniel M. (2008), “Easy on the Mind, Easy on the Wallet: The Roles of Familiarity and Processing Fluency in Valuation Judgments,”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (5), 985–90.
5.
AndersonEugene W., FornellClaes, and MazvancherylSanal K. (2004), “Customer Satisfaction and Shareholder Value,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 172–85.
6.
ArkesHal R., DawesRobyn M., and ChristensenCaryn (1986), “Factors Influencing the Use of a Decision Rule in a Probabilistic Task,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37 (1), 93–110.
7.
ArrowK. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Helsinki: Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö.
8.
BatesDouglas, MaechlerMartin, BolkerBen, and WalkerSteve (2015), “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4,”Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48.
9.
BenartziShlomo (2001), “Excessive Extrapolation and the Allocation of 401 (k) Accounts to Company Stock,”Journal of Finance, 56 (5), 1747–64.
CampbellMargaret C., and GoodsteinRonald C. (2001), “The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers’ Evaluations of Product Incongruity: Preference for the Norm,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (3), 439–49.
12.
CarlsonJay P., VincentLeslie H., HardestyDavid M., and BeardenWilliam O. (2009), “Objective and Subjective Knowledge Relationships: A Quantitative Analysis of Consumer Research Findings,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (5), 864–76.
13.
CloreGerald L. (1992), “Cognitive Phenomenology: Feelings and the Construction of Judgment,”The Construction of Social JudgmentsMartinL.L. and TesserA., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 133–63.
14.
CraikKenneth J.W. (1967), The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CramerJames J. (2013), Get Rich Carefully. New York: Penguin.
FernandesDaniel, LynchJohn G.Jr., and NetemeyerRichard G. (2014), “Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Downstream Financial Behaviors,”Management Science, 60 (8), 1861–83.
18.
FernbachPhilip M., DarlowAdam, and SlomanSteven A. (2011), “Asymmetries in Predictive and Diagnostic Reasoning,”Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 140 (2), 168–85.
19.
FernbachPhilip M., RogersTodd, FoxCraig R., and SlomanSteven A. (2013), “Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding,”Psychological Science, 24 (6), 939–46.
20.
FernbachPhilip M., SlomanSteven A., LouisRobert St., and ShubeJulia N. (2013), “Explanation Fiends and Foes: How Mechanistic Detail Determines Understanding and Preference,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (5), 1115–31.
FischhoffBaruch, SlovicPaul, and LichtensteinSarah (1977), “Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence,”Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 3 (4), 552–64.
23.
FischhoffBaruch, SlovicPaul, LichtensteinSarah, ReadStephen, and CombsBarbara (1978), “How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits,”Policy Sciences, 9 (2), 127–52.
FoxCraig R., ErnerCarsten, and WaltersDaniel J. (2016), “Decision Under Risk: From the Field to the Lab and Back,”Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision MakingKerenG. and WuG., eds. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell, 41–88.
26.
FoxCraig R., TannenbaumDavid, ÜlkümenGülden, WaltersDaniel J., and ErnerCarsten (2018), “Credit, Blame, Luck, and Epistemic Versus Aleatory Attributions of Uncertainty,”working paper, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles.
27.
FoxCraig R., and ÜlkümenGülden (2011), “Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty,”Perspectives on Thinking, Judging, and Decision MakingBrunW., KerenG., KirkeboenG. and MontgomeryH., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 21–35.
28.
FrazierBrandy N., GelmanSusan A., and WellmanHenry M. (2009), “Preschoolers’ Search for Explanatory Information Within Adult-Child Conversation,”Child Development, 80 (6), 1592–611.
29.
FrazierBrandy N., GelmanSusan A., and WellmanHenry M. (2016), “Young Children Prefer and Remember Satisfying Explanations,”Journal of Cognition and Development, 17 (5), 718–36.
30.
FriederLaura, and SubrahmanyamAvanidhar (2005), “Brand Perceptions and the Market for Common Stock,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40 (1), 57–85.
31.
GlymourClark N. (2001), The Mind's Arrows: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
GoldsteinDaniel G., and GigerenzerGerd (2002), “Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic,”Psychological Review, 109 (1), 75–90.
33.
GoldsteinDaniel G., and RothschildDavid (2014), “Lay Understanding of Probability Distributions,”Judgment and Decision Making, 9 (1), 1–14.
34.
GopnikAlison (1998), “Explanation as Orgasm,”Minds and Machines, 8 (1), 101–18.
35.
GopnikAlison, GlymourClark, SobelDavid M., SchulzLaura E., KushnirTamar, and DanksDavid (2004), “A Theory of Causal Learning in Children: Causal Maps and Bayes Nets,”Psychological Review, 111 (1), 3–32.
36.
GrahamJohn R., HarveyCampbell R., and HuangHai (2009), “Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias,”Management Science, 55 (7), 1094–106.
37.
GrossmanSanford J., and ShillerRobert J. (1980), “The Determinants of the Variability of Stock Market Prices,”American Economic Review, 71 (2), 222–27.
38.
GrullonGustavo, KanatasGeorge, and WestonJames P. (2004), “Advertising, Breadth of Ownership, and Liquidity,”Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2), 439–61.
39.
HadarLiat, SoodSanjay, and FoxCraig R. (2013), “Subjective Knowledge in Consumer Financial Decisions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (3), 303–16.
40.
HeXin, InmanJ. Jeffrey, and MittalVikas (2008), “Gender Jeopardy in Financial Risk Taking,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (4), 414–24.
41.
HeathChip, and TverskyAmos (1991), “Preference and Belief: Ambiguity and Competence in Choice Under Uncertainty,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4 (1), 5–28.
42.
HayekFriedrich A. (1945), “The Use of Knowledge in Society,”American Economic Review, 35 (4), 519–30.
43.
JaccardJames, and WoodGregory (1988), “The Effects of Incomplete Information on the Formation of Attitudes Toward Behavioral Alternatives,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (4), 580–91.
44.
JacobyLawrence L., KelleyColleen M., and DywanJane (1989), “Memory Attributions,”Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel TulvingRoedigerH.L.III and CraikF., eds. New York: Psychology Press, 391–422.
45.
JhangJi Hoon, GrantSusan Jung, and CampbellMargaret C. (2012), “Get It? Got It. Good! Enhancing New Product Acceptance by Facilitating Resolution of Extreme Incongruity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (2), 247–59.
46.
JohnsonEric J., and TverskyAmos (1983), “Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (1), 20–31.
47.
JohnsonEric J., and TverskyAmos (1984), “Representations of Perceptions of Risks,”Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 113 (1), 55–70.
48.
JohnsonRichard D., and LevinIrwin P. (1985), “More Than Meets the Eye: The Effect of Missing Information on Purchase Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (2), 169–77.
49.
KenwardMichael G., and RogerJames H. (1997), “Small Sample Inference for Fixed Effects from Restricted Maximum Likelihood,”Biometrics, 53 (3), 983–97.
KnightF. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. New York: Houghton‐Mifflin.
52.
KoriatAsher, and Levy-SadotRavit (2001), “The Combined Contributions of the Cue-Familiarity and Accessibility Heuristics to Feelings of Knowing,”Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27 (1), 34–53.
53.
KruegerNorris, and DicksonPeter R. (1994), “How Believing in Ourselves Increases Risk Taking: Perceived Self‐Efficacy and Opportunity Recognition,”Decision Sciences, 25 (3), 385–400.
54.
KumarV., and ShahDenish (2009), “Expanding the Role of Marketing: From Customer Equity to Market Capitalization,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (6), 119–36.
55.
LarsenSteen Folke (1980), “Memory for Radio News: Discourse Structure and Knowledge Updating,”Text ProcessingFlannerA. and KintschW., eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
56.
LindellMichael K., and EarleTimothy C. (1983), “How Close Is Close Enough: Public Perceptions of the Risks of Industrial Facilities,”Risk Analysis, 3 (4), 245–53.
57.
LynchPeter (1989), One Up on Wall Street. New York: Simon & Schuster.
58.
MarchJames G., and ShapiraZur (1987), “Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking,”Management Science, 33 (11), 1404–18.
59.
MarkowitzHarry (1952), “Portfolio Selection,”Journal of Finance, 7 (1), 77–91.
60.
MazumdarTridib, and MonroeKent B. (1992), “Effects of Inter-Store and In-Store Price Comparisons on Price Recall Accuracy and Confidence,”Journal of Retailing, 68 (1), 66–89.
61.
PeterJ. Paul, and RyanMichael J. (1976), “An Investigation of Perceived Risk at the Brand Level,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (2), 184–88.
62.
PorterMichael E. (1979), “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy,”Harvard Business Review, (March/April), 21–38.
63.
PorterMichael E. (2008), “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy,”Harvard Business Review, (January), 23–42.
64.
PrattJohn W (1964), “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large,”Econometrica, 32 (1/2), 122–36.
65.
ReberRolf, WinkielmanPiotr, and SchwarzNorbert (1998), “Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments,”Psychological Science, 9 (1), 45–48.
66.
ReinholtzNicholas, FernbachPhilip M., and de LangheBart (2016), “Do People Understand the Benefit of Diversification?”working paper, University of Colorado Boulder, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2719144.
67.
RosseelYves (2012), “lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling,”Journal of Statistical Software, 48 (2), 1–36.
68.
RottmanBenjamin Margolin, and HastieReid (2014), “Reasoning About Causal Relationships: Inferences on Causal Networks,”Psychological Bulletin, 140 (1), 109–39.
69.
SchacterDaniel L. (1983), “Feeling of Knowing in Episodic Memory,”Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9 (1), 39–54.
70.
SchoenbergerChana R. (2015), “Peter Lynch, 25 Years Later: It's Not Just ‘Invest in What You Know,’”The Wall Street Journal (December 6).
71.
SharpeWilliam F. (1966), “Mutual Fund Performance,”Journal of Business, 39 (1), 119–38.
SlomanSteven (2005), Causal Models: How People Think About the World and Its Alternatives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
SlovicPaul (1987), “Perception of Risk,”Science, 236 (4799), 280–85.
75.
SongHyunjin, and SchwarzNorbert (2009), “If It's Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky: Fluency, Familiarity, and Risk Perception,”Psychological Science, 20 (2), 135–38.
ThorndykePerry W. (1977), “Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse,”Cognitive Psychology, 9 (1), 77–110.
78.
ThorndykePerry W. (1979), “Knowledge Acquisition from Newspaper Stories,”Discourse Processes, 2 (2), 95–112.
79.
TroutJ.D. (2002), “Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding,”Philosophy of Science, 69 (2), 212–33.
80.
ÜlkümenGülden, ErnerCarsten, WaltersDaniel, TannenbaumDavid, and FoxCraig R. (2014), “Perceived Nature of Market Uncertainty Predicts Investment Behavior and Market Outcomes,”paper presented at the 2014 Boulder Summer Conference on Consumer Financial Decision Making, University of Colorado Boulder (April 21).
81.
WaltersDaniel J., FernbachPhilip M., FoxCraig R., and SlomanSteven A. (2017), “Known Unknowns: A Critical Determinant of Confidence and Calibration,”Management Science, 4298–4307.
82.
WeberElke U., ShafirSharoni, and BlaisAnn-Renee (2004), “Predicting Risk Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation,”Psychological Review, 111 (2), 430–35.
83.
WhittleseaBruce W.A., JacobyLarry L., and GirardKrista (1990), “Illusions of Immediate Memory: Evidence of an Attributional Basis for Feelings of Familiarity and Perceptual Quality,”Journal of Memory and Language, 29 (6), 716–32.
84.
ZajoncRobert B. (2001), “Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal,”Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10 (6), 224–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
