Using Auxiliary Sample Frame Information for Optimum Sampling of Rare Populations

Abstract

We investigate disproportionate stratified sampling as a possibly efficient method of surveying members of a rare domain in circumstances in which there is no acceptable list of members. In this work, we assume that information is available at the sampling stage to stratify the general-population sampling frame into high- and low-density strata. Under a fixed constraint on the variance of the estimator of the domain mean, we make the optimum allocation of sample size to the several strata and show that, in comparison to proportional allocation, the optimum allocation requires (a) a smaller total sample size but (b) a larger number of interviews of members of the rare domain. We illustrate the methods using information about American consumers maintained by market-research companies. Such companies are able to develop lists of households that are thought to have a defined attribute of interest, such as at least one resident in a user-specified age range. The lists are imperfect, with false positives and negatives. We apply an age-targeted list to the National Immunization Survey (NIS), conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which targets the relatively rare population of children age 19–35 months. The age-targeted list comprises the high-density stratum and the rest of the survey’s sampling frame comprises the low-density stratum. Given the optimum allocation, we demonstrate potential cost savings for the NIS in excess of ten percent.

Keywords

Optimum allocation cost model variance disproportionate stratification rare population age-targeted list telephone surveys National Immunization Survey

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2010. “Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0–18 Years – United States, 2010.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 58 (51 & 52); 1–4. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5851a6.htm (accessed 10/13/2015).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2012a. “National, State, and Local Area Vaccination Coverage Among Children Aged 19-35 Months – United States, 2011.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 61: 689–696. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6135a1.htm (accessed 10/13/2015).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2012b. National Immunization Survey: A User’s Guide for the 2011 Public-Use Data File. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nis/data_files.htm

Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques, (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Kalton, G. 2009. “Methods for Oversampling Rare Subpopulations in Social Surveys.” Survey Methodology Journal 35: 125–141.

Kalton, G., and D.W. Anderson. 1986. “Sampling Rare Populations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 149: 65–82. Doi: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/2981886.

Pasek, J., S.M. Jang, C.L. Cobb, J.M. Dennis, and C. DiSorga. 2014. “Can Marketing Data Aid Survey Research? Examining Accuracy and Completeness in Consumer File Data.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78: 889–916. Doi: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/poq/nfu043.

Srinath, K.P., M.P. Battaglia, and M. Khare. 2004. A Dual Frame Sampling Design for an RDD Survey that Screens for a Rare Population, In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, Toronto, August 8–12, 2004. (pp. 4424–4429). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2004/files/Jsm2004-000462.pdf (accessed 10/13/2015).

Sudman, S. 1972. “On Sampling of Very Rare Human Populations.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 67: 335–339. Doi: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482383.

10.

Valliant, R., F. Hubbard, S. Lee, and C. Chang. 2014. “Efficient Use of Commercial Lists in U.S. Household Sampling.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2: 182–209. Doi: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/jssam/smu006.

11.

Waksberg, J. 1973. The Effect of Stratification with Differential Sampling Rates on Attributes of Subsets of the Population. In Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, New York City, December 27–30, 1973. (pp. 429–434). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ (accessed 10/13/2015).