Research ethics protocols relating to human participants were compared across five countries, namely, Australia, Azerbaijan, Iran, the Philippines, and South Africa. These countries were considered to be geographically and culturally diverse, as well as representing both developed and developing countries. The extent to which the research participant is protected across cultures and countries was investigated, with particular focus on the use of informed consent procedures. It was argued that current ethical guidelines and practices fail to ensure the protection of the most vulnerable participants within these cultures. Informed consent mechanisms also often fail to consider cultural differences in self-concept, understanding of research methods, and power differences between researchers and participants. Discussion of these ethical challenges and recommendations for research ethics development within these cultures and countries are discussed.
AdamsV.MillerS.CraigS.SonamNyimaDroyoung. (2007). Informed consent in cross-cultural perspective: Clinical research in the Tibetan Autonomous Region, PRC. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, 31(4), 445–472.
2.
BailesM. J.MinasI. H., & KlimidisS. (2006). Mental health research, ethics and multiculturalism. Monash Bioethics Review, 25(1), 53–63.
3.
BarrettR. J., & ParkerD. B. (2003). Rites of consent: Negotiating research participation in diverse cultures. Monash Bioethics Review, 22(2), 9–26.
4.
BenatarS. R. (2002). Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1131–1141.
5.
BrethertonD., & MellorD. (2006). Reconciliation between Aboriginal and other Australians: The “Stolen Generations.”Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 81–98.
6.
De GeorgeR. T. (1969). Soviet ethics and morality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Department of Health. (2004). Ethics in health research: Principles, structures and processes. South Africa.
8.
DonovanR. J., & SparkR. (1997). Towards guidelines for survey research in remote Aboriginal communities. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 21(1), 89–95.
9.
DunnL. B.CandilisP. J., & RobertsL. W. (2006). Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(1), 47–68.
10.
DunnL. B.NowrangiM. A.PalmerB. W.JesteD. V., & SaksE. R. (2006). Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: A review of instruments. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(8), 1323–1334.
11.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.KillenJ., & GradyC. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189(5), 930–937.
FadareJ. O., & PorteriC. (2010). Informed consent in human subject research: A comparison of current international and Nigerian guidelines. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(1), 67–73.
14.
FarnellS. M. (2002). Perspective—Informed consent—East meets West—Worlds apart?Medical and Pediatric Oncology38(3), 201–202.
15.
FogartyG. J., & WhiteC. (1994). Differences between values of Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(3), 394–408.
16.
GillamL., & PyettP. (2003). A commentary on the NH&MRC draft values and ethics in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. Monash Bioethics Review, 22(4), 8–19.
17.
GordonJ. S. (2011). Global ethics and principlism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 21(3), 251–276.
18.
GrierP. T. (1978). Marxist ethical theory in the Soviet Union. Dordrecht, Neth.: D. Reidel Publishing.
19.
GrimmS. D.ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S., & ReyesJ. A. S. (1999). Self-described traits, values, and moods associated with individualism and collectivism: Testing I-C theory in an individualistic (U.S.) and a collectivistic (Philippine) culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(4), 466–500.
20.
JohnstoneM.-J. (2007). Research ethics, reconciliation, and strengthening the research relationship in Indigenous health domains: An Australian perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(3), 391–406.
21.
KamenkaE. (1972). The ethical foundations of Marxism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
22.
KarimQ. A.KarimS. S. A.CoovadiaH. M., & SusserM. (1998). Informed consent for HIV testing in a South African hospital: Is it truly informed and truly voluntary?American Journal of Public Health, 88(4), 637–640.
23.
LeongF. T. L., & LyonsB. (2010). Ethical challenges for cross-cultural research conducted by psychologists from the United States. Ethics & Behavior, 20(3–4), 250–264.
24.
LomelinoP. J. (2009). Reconceptualizing autonomy to address cross-cultural differences in informed consent. Social Philosophy Today, 25, 179–194.
25.
MammadovV. G. (2012). Recent developments in bioethics and medical law in Azerbaijan assessed by UNESCO as pioneer in the region. World Association for Medical Law, 4(2), 4–6.
26.
MarkusH. R., & KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self-implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
27.
MilfordC.WassenaarD., & SlackC. (2006). Resource and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: Preparations for HIV vaccine trials. IRB, 28(2), 1–9.
28.
Ministry of Health and Medical Education. (2010). National Committee for Ethics in Medical Research. Retrieved from http://www.hbi.ir/.
29.
MkhizeN. J. (2006). Communal personhood and the principle of autonomy: The ethical challenges. Canadian Medical Education, 24, 26–29.
30.
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2003). Values and ethics: Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/e52.
ReyesM. V. T. (2004). Directions in Philippine health research: Ethics review. Paper presented at the Philippine National Health Research System Assembly, Manila, Philippines.
35.
ShahS. A. (2012). Ethical standards for transnational mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS): Do no harm, preventing cross-cultural errors and inviting pushback. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(4), 438–449.
36.
TangwaG. B. (2009). Ethical principles in health research and review process. Acta Tropica, 112, 2–7.
37.
UpvallM., & HashwaniS. (2001). Negotiating the informed-consent process in developing countries: A comparison of Swaziland and Pakistan. International Nursing Review, 48(3), 188–192.
38.
WassenaarD. R. (1998). A history of ethical codes in South African psychology: An insider's view. South African Journal of Psychology, 28(3), 135–145.
