The Effects of Age,Information,and Personal Contact on Attitudes toward Individuals with Cleft-Lip and Palate

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to examine how information and brief personal contact with individuals who have a cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) affected attitudes and to compare these effects across two age cohorts.

Design and Participants

A pretest-posttest design was utilized to determine if accurate information and personal contact with an individual with CLP would affect cognitive, emotional, and behavioral attitudes in participants without CLP. To assess attitudes, 189 participants without cleft lip and palate completed a modified version of the Multidimensional Attitudes Scale toward Persons with Disabilities (Findler et al., 2007). The study included a child cohort (n = 78; Mean age = 10.01 years) and a young adult cohort (n = 111; Mean age = 19.58 years).

Results

Using a mixed MANCOVA, it was found that children's cognitive attitudes were significantly improved (22.54%) by information and personal contact with individuals with CLP. Within the young adult cohort, however, findings were inconsistent with prior research in that information and personal contact did not significantly affect their attitudes. There were no significant differences in attitudes between the age cohorts; however, data suggests that the children responded differently to the experimental intervention.

Conclusions

Nonclefted children's attitudes toward individuals with CLP can be significantly improved using educational information and personal contact with individuals with CLP. In the current study, the combination of accurate information and personal contact enhanced the degree of attitude change over and above the provision of information only.

Keywords

cleft-lip and palate attitudes personal contact

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

G.W.

The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1954.

Ajzen

, Fishbein

Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1980.

Ballard

Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Psychol Rep. 1992; 71: 1155–1160.

Barr

J.J.

, Bracchita

Effects of contact with individuals with disabilities: positive attitudes and majoring in education. J Psychol. 2008; 142: 225–243.

Batson

C.D.

, Ahmad

N.Y.

Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2009; 3: 141–177. Bull R, Rumsey N. The Social Psychology of Facial Appearance. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1988.

Burstein

(Director). To Have and to Hope: Children With Cleft Lip and/or Palate [Informational video]. Atlanta: Healthcare of Atlanta; 2006.

Carroll

, Shute

School peer victimization of young people with cranio-facial conditions: a comparative study. Psychol Health, Med. 2005; 10: 291–305.

Chan

R.K.

, McPherson

, Whitehill

T.L.

Chinese attitudes toward cleft lip and palate: effects of personal contact. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006; 43: 731–739.

Cline

, Proto

, Raval

, Dipaolo

The effects of brief exposure and of classroom teaching on attitudes children express towards facial disfigurement. Educ Research. 1998; 40: 55–68.

10.

Corrigan

P.W.

, River

L.P.

, Lundin

R.K.

, Penn

D.L.

, Uphoff-Wasowski

, Campion

, Mathisen

, Gagnon

, Bergman

, Goldstein

. Three strategies about changing attitudes about schizophrenia. Schizphr Bull. 2001; 27: 187–195.

11.

Crowne

D.P.

, Marlowe

A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol. 1960; 24: 349–354.

12.

Edwards

The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. J Pesr Soc Psychol. 1990; 59: 202–216.

13.

Findler

, Vilchinsky

, Werner

The multidimensional attitudes scale toward persons with disabilities (MAS): construction and validation. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2007; 50: 166–176.

14.

Gliner

J.A.

, Morgan

G.A.

Research Design and Analysis in Applied Settings: An Integrated Approach to Design and Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.

15.

Hanson

The answered patient: anxiety overview [Series episode]. New York: AnswersMedia, LLC; 2008.

16.

Haugtvedt

C.P.

, Petty

R.E.

Personality and persuasion: need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992; 63: 308–319.

17.

Herek

G.M.

, Capitanio

J.P.

“Some of my best friends”: intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1996; 22: 412–424.

18.

Kapp-Simon

K.A.

, McGuire

D.E.

Observed social interaction patterns in adolescents with and without craniofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997; 34: 380–384.

19.

McManus

, Feyes

, Saucier

Contact and knowledge as predictors of attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities. J Soc Pers Relat. 2010; 28: 26–37.

20.

Nabors

L.A.

, Lehmkuhl

H.D.

, Warm

J.S.

Children's acceptance ratings of a child with a facial scar: the impact of positive scripts. Early Educ Dev. 2004; 15: 79–92.

21.

Nowicki

E.A.

, Sandieson

A meta-analysis of school-age children's attitudes towards persons with physical or intellectual disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2002; 49: 243–265.

22.

Okkerse

J.M.

, Beemer

F.A.

, Cordia-De Haan

, Heinemen-De Boer

J.A.

, Mellenberhg

G.J.

, Wolters

H.G.

Facial attractiveness and facial impairment ratings in children with craniofacial malformations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001; 38: 386–392.

23.

Olson

J.M.

, Zanna

M.P.

Attitudes and attitude change. Annu Rev Psychol. 1993; 44: 117–154.

24.

Pettigrew

T.F.

Racially Separate or Together? New York: McGraw-Hill; 1971.

25.

Pettigrew

T.F.

Intergroup contact theory. Annu Rev Psychol. 1998; 49: 65–85.

26.

Reed

, Robathan

, Hockenhull

, Rostill

, Perrett

, Lees

Children's attitudes toward interacting with peers with different craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999; 36: 441–447.

27.

Schwartz

L.K.

, Simmons

J.P.

Contact quality and attitudes toward the elderly. Educ Gerontol. 2001; 27: 127–137.

28.

Sigelman

, Welch

The contact hypothesis revisited: black–white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces. 1993; 71: 781–795.

29.

Shenaq

S.M.

, Kim

J.S.

, Bienstock

, Roth

F.S.

, Eser

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. In: Brunicardi

F.C.

, ed., Schwartz's Manual of Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006: 1169–1187.

30.

Tabachnick

B.G.

, Fidell

L.S.

Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education; 2007.

31.

Turner

S.R.

, Rumsey

, Sandy

J.R.

Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20: 407–415.