Seeing Eye-to-Eye: Do Intergroup Biases Operate Similarly for Younger and Older Adults?

Abstract

Because of their relatively temporary group memberships, age groups represent an intriguing test of theories of intergroup relations. In spite of this unique feature, virtually no research has examined age group relations from an intergroup perspective. The present study investigated the role of two influential intergroup factors, degree of group identification and threats to group status, in younger and older adults' evaluations of their in group (own age group) and the outgroup (other age group). Participants were placed in situations in which their ingroup was either superior or inferior to the outgroup. Several measures of bias were then assessed, including ingroup favoritism, perceived similarity, social distance, outgroup homogeneity, and self-stereotyping. The results support the notion that age groups are unique from other groups, as age influenced all forms of bias. In particular, young adults exhibited more biases than older adults by perceiving less similarity and distancing themselves more from the outgroup. These findings suggest that older adults' greater familiarity with the outgroup might attenuate their age-based biases compared with younger participants.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

N. H.

(1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272–279.

Batson

C. D.

Chang

Orr

Rowland

(2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666.

Branscombe

N. R.

Ellemers

Spears

Doosje

(1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In Ellemers

Spears

Doosje

(Eds.), Social identity context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford: Blackwell.

Branscombe

N. R.

Wann

D. L.

(1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657.

Celejewski

Dion

K. K.

(1998). Self-perception and perception of age groups as a function of the perceiver's category membership. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 47, 205–216.

Chasteen

A. L.

(2000). The role of age and age-related attitudes in perceptions of elderly individuals. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 147–156.

Chasteen

A. L.

Schwarz

Park

D. C.

(2002). The activation of aging stereotypes in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P540–P547.

Crockett

W. H.

Hummert

M. L.

(1987). Perceptions of aging and the elderly. In Schaie

K. W.

Eisdorfer

(Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 7, pp. 217–241). New York: Springer.

Doosje

Ellemers

(1997). Stereotyping under threat: The role of group identification. In Spears

Oakes

P. J.

Ellemers

Haslam

S. A.

(Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 257–272). Oxford: Blackwell.

10.

Doosje

Ellemers

Spears

(1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.

11.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. C.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

12.

Galinsky

A. D.

Moskowitz

G. B.

(2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and ingroup favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724.

13.

Garstka

T. A.

Branscombe

N. R.

Hummert

M. L.

(1997, May). Age group identification across the lifespan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.

14.

Gray-Little

Hafdahl

A. R.

(2000). Factors influencing racial comparisons of self-esteem: A quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 26–54.

15.

Hewstone

(2003). Intergroup contact: Panacea for prejudice? Psychologist, 16, 352–355.

16.

Hummert

M. L.

(1999). A social cognitive perspective on age stereotypes. In Hess

T. M.

Blanchard-Fields

(Eds.), Social cognition and aging (pp. 175–196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

17.

Kite

M. E.

Johnson

B. T.

(1988). Attitudes toward older and younger adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 3, 233–244.

18.

Kite

M. E.

Wagner

L. S.

(2002). Attitudes toward older adults. In Nelson

T. D.

(Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 129–162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

19.

Lutsky

(1980). Attitudes toward old age and elderly persons. In Eisdorfer

(Ed.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol.1 (Vol. 1, pp. 287–336). New York: Springer.

20.

Matheson

D. H.

Collins

C. L.

Kuehne

V. S.

(2000). Older adults' multiple stereotypes of young adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41, 245–257.

21.

Novak

Campbell

(2001). Aging and society: A Canadian perspective (4th ed.). Toronto: Nelson Thomson Learning.

22.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In Oskamp

(Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: The Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 93–114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

23.

Snyder

Miene

P. K.

(1994). Stereotyping of the elderly: A functional approach. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 63–82.

24.

Spears

Doosje

Ellemers

(1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–553.

25.

Tajfel

(1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, England: University Press.

26.

Whitbourne

S. K.

(2001). Adult development and aging: Biopsychosocial perspectives. New York: Wiley.