To check on impressionistic assertions that the United States is becoming an “age-irrelevant society,” a quota sample of white-collar and blue-collar men and women (ages eighteen to seventy; N = 462) was studied with a questionnaire that asked for designation of the most suitable ages for various role transitions and age-related attributes. The findings converged with pertinent recent reports from more representative samples. Comparisons with findings in the 1950s indicated loosening of the norms, but with continuing adherence to a prescriptive timetable and with persistent socio-economic differences. These results challenge the notion of age-irrelevance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NeugartenB. L. and DatanN., Sociological Perspectives on the Life Cycle, in Lifespan Developmental Psychology: Personality and Socialization, BaltesP. B. and SchaieK. W. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 52–69, 1973.
2.
ElderG. H.Jr., Age Differentiation and the Life Course, Annual Review of Sociology, 1, pp. 165–190, 1975.
3.
NeugartenB. L. and HagestadG. O., Age and the Life Course, in Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, BinstockR. H. and ShanasE. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, pp. 35–55, 1976.
4.
HarevenT. K., The Life Course and Aging in Historical Perspective, in Aging and Life Course Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, HarevenT. K. and AdamsK. J. (eds.), The Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 1–26, 1982.
5.
NeugartenB. L., Time, Age, and the Life Cycle, American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, pp. 887–894, 1979.
6.
NeugartenB. L.MooreJ. W., and LoweJ. C., Age, Norms, Age Constraints, and Adult Socialization, American Journal of Sociology, 70, pp. 710–717, 1965.
7.
NeugartenB. L. and PetersonW. A., A Study of the American Age-Grade System, Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the International Association of Gerontology, 3, pp. 497–502, 1957.
8.
DrevenstedtJ., Perceptions of Onsets of Young Adulthood, Middle Age, and Old Age, Journal of Gerontology, 31, pp. 53–57, 1976.
9.
U. S. Bureau of the Census, Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1983, Current Population Reports, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, Series P-20, No. 389, 1984.
10.
National Council on the Aging, Aging in the Eighties: America in Transition, National Council on the Aging, Washington, DC, 1981.
11.
Fallo-MitchellL. and RyffC. D., Preferred Timing of Female Life Events, Research on Aging, 4, pp. 249–267, 1982.
12.
RileyM. W. and FonerA. (eds.), Aging and Society: An Inventory of Research Findings, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, 1968.
13.
PetersG. R., Self-Conceptions of the Aged, Age Identification, and Aging, The Gerontologist, 11: Part 2, pp. 69–73, 1971.
14.
ModellJ.FurstenbergF. F.Jr., and StrongD., The Timing of Marriage in the Transition to Adulthood: Continuity and Change, 1860–1975, in Turning Points: Historical and Sociological Essays on the Family, DemosJ. and BoocockS. S. (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 120–150, 1978.
15.
HoganD. P., Transitions and Social Change: The Early Lives of American Men, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1981.
16.
FryC. L., Temporal and Status Dimensions of Life Cycles, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 17, pp. 281–300, 1983.
17.
HallE., Acting One's Age: New Roles for Old: Bernice Neugarten Interviewed, Psychology Today, pp. 66–80, April 1980.
18.
NeugartenB. L., Policy for the 1980s: Age or Need Entitlement, National Journal Issues Book, pp. 48–52, November 1980.
19.
HirschornL., Social Policy and the Life Cycle: A Developmental Perspective, Social Service Review, 51, pp. 434–450, 1977.
