Processing speed, inhibitory control and working memory have been identified as the main possible culprits of age-related cognitive decline. This article describes a study of their interrelationships and dependence on age, including exploration of whether any of them mediates between age and the others. We carried out a LISREL analysis of the performance of 79 participants of low educational level aged 40–91 years in six cognitive tasks. In the best mediational model the effects of age on inhibitory control and working memory are largely mediated by its effect on processing speed. However, in the best-fitting model age has only direct effects on processing speed, working memory, and inhibitory control.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenP. A.HallR. J.DruleyJ. A.SmithA. F.SandersR. E., & MurphyM. D. (2001). How shared are age-related influences on cognitive and noncognitive variables?Psychology and Aging, 16, 532–549.
2.
AnsteyK. (1999). Construct overlap in resource theories of memory aging. Commentary. Gerontology, 45, 348–350.
3.
ArdilaA.Ostrosky-SolisF.RoselliM., & GómezC. (2000). Age-related cognitive decline during normal aging: The complex effect of education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 495–513.
4.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
5.
BeckerM.SturmW.WillmesK., & ZimmermannP. (1996). Normierungsstudie zur Aufmerksamkeit-stestbatterie (TAP) von Zimmermann und Fimm [A normative study on the Attention Test Battery (TAP) by Zimmermann and Fimm]. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 7, 3–15.
6.
BellevilleS.RouleauN., & CazaN. (1998). Effect of normal aging on the manipulation of information in working memory. Memory and Cognition, 26, 572–583.
7.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
8.
BirrenJ. R. (1956). The significance of age changes in speed of perception and psycho-motor skills. In AndersonJ. E. (Ed.), Psychological aspects of aging (pp. 97–104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
BorsD. A., & ForrinB. (1995). Age, speed of information processing, recall, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 20, 229–248.
10.
BurkeD. M. (1997). Language, aging, and inhibitory deficits: Evaluation of a theory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, 254–264.
11.
ByrneB. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
CarpenterP. A.MiyakeA., & JustM. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension. Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. In GernsbacherM. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1075–1122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
13.
ChristensenH.MaCkinnonA. J.KortenA., & JormA. F. (2001). The “common cause hypothesis” of cognitive aging: Evidence for not only a common factor but also specific associations of age with vision and grip strength in a cross-sectional analysis. Psychology and Aging, 16, 588–599.
14.
DempsterF. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45–75.
15.
EarlesJ. L. K.ConnorL. T.FrieskeD.ParkD. C.SmithA. D., & ZwahrM. (1997). Age differences in inhibition: Possible causes and consequences. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4, 45–57.
16.
EngleR. W.TuholskiSt. W.LaughlinJ. E.ConwayA. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–933.
17.
Everson-RoseS. A.de LeonMendes C. F.BieniasJ. L.WilsonR. S., & EvansD. A. (2003). Early life conditions and cognitive functioning in later life. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 1083–1089.
18.
FinkelD.PedersenN. L.PlominR., & McClearnG. E. (1998). Longitudinal and cross-sectional twin data on cognitive abilities in adulthood: The Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1400–1413.
19.
GauggelS.LeinbergerR., & RichardtM., (2001). Goal setting and reaction time performance in brain-damaged patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 351–361.
20.
GrégoireJ., & van der LindenM. (1997). Effect of age on forward and backward digit spans. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4, 140–149.
21.
FimmB.VohnR.DaumannJ.Gouzoulis-MayfrankE.ThronA., & Willmes-Von HinckeldeyK. (2001). Different functional representation of verbal working memory for numbers or letters: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 13(6), 664
22.
HaalandK.VranesL.GoodwinJ., & GarryP. (1987). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in a healthy elderly population. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 345–346.
23.
HartmanM.DumasJ., & NielsenC. (2001). Age differences in updating working memory: Evidence from the delayed-matching-to-sample test. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 8, 14–35.
24.
HasherL., & ZacksR. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
25.
HertzogC.DixonR. A.HultschD. F., & MacDonaldS. W. S. (2003). Latent change models of adult cognition: Are changes in processing speed and working memory associated with changes in episodic memory?Psychology and Aging, 18, 755–769.
26.
HolleyP. E., & McEvoyC. L. (1996). Aging and inhibition of unconsciously processed information: No apparent deficit. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 241–256.
27.
JöreskogK. G., & SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
MacCallumR. C., & AustinJ. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.
29.
MaddenD. J.PierceT. W., & AllenP. A. (1996). Adult age differences in the use of distractor homogeneity during visual search. Psychology and Aging, 11, 454–474.
30.
MayrU. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96–109.
31.
McCabeJ., & HartmanM. (2003). Examining the locus of age effects on complex span tasks. Psychology and Aging, 18, 562–572.
32.
McDowdJ. M. (1997). Inhibition in attention and aging. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, 265–273.
33.
McDowellI.XiG.LindsayJ., & TuokkoH. (2004). Canadian study of health and aging: Study description and patterns of early cognitive decline. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 11, 149–168.
34.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA., & WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe tasks”: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
35.
Ostrosky-SolisF.ArdilaA., & RoselliM. (1999). NEUROPSI: A brief neuropsychological test battery in Spanish with norms by age and educational level. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 413–433.
36.
ParkD. C. (1999). The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In ParkD. C. & SchwarzN. (Eds.), Cognitive aging. A primer (pp. 3–21). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
37.
ParkD. C.SmithA. D.LautenschlagerG.EarlesJ.FrieskeD.ZwahrM.. (1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 621–637.
38.
PiccininA. M., & RabbittP. A. M. (1999). Contribution of cognitive abilities to performance and improvement on a substitution coding task. Psychology and Aging, 14, 539–551.
39.
SalthouseT. A. (1996). General and specific speed mediation of adult age differences in memory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51B, 30–42.
40.
SalthouseT. A. (2000). Methodological assumptions in cognitive aging research. In CraikF. I. M. & SalthouseT. A. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd. ed., pp. 467–498). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
SalthouseT. A. (2001). Structural models of the relations between age and measures of cognitive functioning. Intelligence, 29, 93–115.
42.
SalthouseT. A., & BabcockR. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 763–776.
43.
SalthouseT. A., & MeinzE. J. (1995). Aging, inhibition, working memory, and speed. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 50B, 297–306.
44.
SalthouseT. A.AtkinsonT. M., & BerishD. E. (2003). Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 566–594.
45.
SliwinskiM., & BuschkeH. (1999). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships among age, cognition, and processing speed. Psychology and Aging, 14, 18–33.
46.
StoltzfusE. R.HasherL.ZacksR. T.UliviM. S., & GoldsteinD. (1993). Investigations of inhibition and interference in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 179–188.
47.
TunP. A., & WingfieldA. (1997). Language and communication: Fundamentals of speech communication and language processing in old age. In FiskA. D., & RogersW. A., Handbook of human factors and the older adult (pp. 125–149). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
van der LindenM.HupetM.FeyereisenP.SchelstraeteM.BestgenY.BruyerR. (1999). Cognitive mediators of age-related differences in language comprehension and verbal memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 6, 32–55.
50.
VerhaeghenP. (1999). The effects of age-related slowing and working memory on asymptotic recognition performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 6, 201–213.
51.
VerhaeghenP., & de MeersmanL. (1998). Aging and negative priming: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 435–444.
52.
VerhaeghenP., & SalthouseT. A. (1997). Meta-analysis of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 231–249.
53.
VerhaeghenP.SteitzD. W.SliwinskiM. J., & CerellaJ. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 443–460.
54.
WechslerD. (1988). WAIS. Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para Adultos. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.
55.
ZacksR., & HasherL. (1997). Cognitive gerontology and attentional inhibition: A reply to Burke and McDowd. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, 274–283.
56.
ZelinskiE. M., & LewisK. L. (2003). Adult age differences in multiple cognitive functions: Differentiation, dedifferentiation, or process-specific change?Psychology and Aging, 18, 727–745.
57.
ZimmermannP., & FimmB. (1992). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) (Spanish version by VendrellJ. M.RenomM., & VelázquezA., 1995). Freiburg: Psytest.
58.
ZoccolottiP.MatanoA.DelocheG.CantagalloA.PassadoriA.Leclercq (2002). Patterns of attentional impairment following closed head injury: A collaborative European study. Cortex, 36, 93–107.
