This qualitative study delineates motives for residential mobility, describes dynamics between the elder and family members during the move decision process, and locates the move decision within ecological layers of the aging context. Interviews were conducted with 30 individuals and couples (ages 60–87) who experienced a community-based move within the past year, and with 14 extended family members. Reasons for moving (from perspectives of both elders who moved and their family members) were grouped into four themes and eleven issues that influenced the move decision. These themes parallel the ecological context of individual health and functioning, beliefs and attitudes, physical environment, and social pressures. Late-life mobility is a significant life transition that is the outcome of an ongoing appraisal and reappraisal of housing fit with individual functioning, needs, and aspirations. Family members are an integral part of these decision and residential mobility processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI., & FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
ArberS., & EvandrouM. (1993). Ageing, independence, and the life course. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
3.
BayerA. H., & HarperL. (2000). Fixing to stay: A national survey of housing and home modification issues. Washington, DC: AARP.
4.
BurkhauserR. V.ButricaB. A., & WasylenkoM. J. (1995). Mobility patterns of older homeowners: Are older homeowners trapped in distressed neighborhoods?Research on Aging, 17, 363–384.
5.
ChenP. C., & WilmothJ. M. (2004). The effects of residential mobility on ADL and IADL limitations among the very old living in the community. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59B, S164–S172.
6.
ChevanA. (1995). Holding on and letting go: Residential mobility during widowhood. Research on Aging, 17(3), 278–302.
7.
ColsherP. L., & WallaceR. B. (1990). Health and social antecedents of relocation in rural elderly persons. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45(1), S32–S38.
8.
ConnidisI. A., & McMullinJ. A. (2002). Sociological ambivalence and family ties: A critical perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 558–567.
9.
DorfmanL. T. (2002). Retirement and family relationships: An opportunity in later life. Generations, 26, 74–79.
10.
EggebeenD. (2002). Intergenerational exchanges. In EkerdtD. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of aging (Vol. 2, pp. 724–726). New York: Macmillan Reference.
11.
EkerdtD. J., & SergeantJ. F. (2006). Family things: Attending the household disbandment of elders. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 193–205.
12.
EkerdtD. J.SergeantJ. F.DingelM., & BowenM. E. (2004). Household disbandment in later life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59B, S265–S273.
13.
FairclothC. A. (2003). Aging bodies: Images and everyday experience. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
14.
FisherB. J. (1990). The stigma of relocation to a retirement facility. Journal of Aging Studies, 4(1), 47–59.
15.
GeorgeL. K. (1993). Sociological perspectives on life transitions. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 353–373.
16.
HummertM. L., & MorganM. (2001). Negotiating decisions in the aging family. In HummertM. L. & NussbaumJ. F. (Eds.), Aging, communication, and health: Linking research and practice for successful aging. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
KennedyD.SylviaE.Bani-IssaW.KhaterW., & ForbesS. (2005). Beyond the rhythm and routine: Adjusting to life in assisted living. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 31, 17–23.
18.
KirlikA., & StraussR. (2002). Medical uncertainty and the older patient: An ecological approach to supporting judgment and decision making. In RogersW. A. & FiskA. D. (Eds.), Human factors interventions for the health care of older adults (pp. 69–90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
LawtonM. P. (1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In LawtonM. P.WindleyP. G., & ByertsT. O. (Eds.), Aging and the environment: Vol. 7, Theoretical approaches (1st ed., pp. 33–59). New York: Springer.
20.
LewinterM. (2003). Reciprocities in caregiving relationships in Danish elder care. Journal of Aging Studies, 17, 357–377.
21.
LittleT. D.HawleyP. H.HenrichC. C., & MarslandK. W. (2002). Three views of the agentic self: A developmental synthesis. In DeciE. L. & RyanR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination (pp. 389–404). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
22.
LitwakE., & LonginoC. F. (1987). Migration patterns among the elderly: A developmental perspective. The Gerontologist, 27, 266–272.
23.
LonginoC. F.JacksonD. J.ZimmermanR. S., & BradsherJ. E. (1991). The second move: Health and geographic mobility. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 46, S218–S224.
24.
MackR.SalmoniA.Viverais-DresslerG.PorterE., & GargR. (1997). Perceived risks to independent living: The views of older, community-dwelling adults. The Gerontologist, 37, 729–736.
25.
MaddoxG. L. (2001). Housing and living arrangements: A transactional perspective. In BinstockR. H. & GeorgeL. K. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (5th ed., pp. 426–443). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
MarcouxJ.-S. (2001). The “Casser Maison” ritual. Journal of Material Culture, 6, 213–235.
27.
MaxwellJ. A. (1998). Designing a qualitative study. In RogD. J. & BickmanL. (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 69–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
MeyerJ. W., & SpeareA. (1985). Distinctively elderly mobility: Types and determinants. Economic Geography, 61, 79–88.
29.
National Association of Home Builders. (2001). Housing: Facts, figures, and trends. Washington, DC: National Association of Home Builders.
30.
NettingF. E., & WilsonC. C. (1991). Accommodation and relocation decision making in continuing care retirement communities. Health and Social Work, 16, 266–273.
31.
QSR International. (2002). Using NVivo in qualitative research. Melbourne, Australia: QSR International.
32.
RyanR. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.
33.
SilversteinM., & AngelelliJ. J. (1998). Older parents' expectations of moving closer to their children. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 53B, S153–S163.
34.
SilversteinM., & ZablotskyD. L. (1996). Health and social precursors of later life retirement-community migration. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 51B, S150–S156.
35.
SilverstoneB. M., & HorowitzA. (1992). Aging in place: The role of families. Generations, 16(2), 27–30.
36.
SmiderN. A.EssexM. J., & RyffC. D. (1996). Adaptation to community relocation: The interactive influence of psychological resources and contextual factors. Psychology and Aging, 11, 362–372.
37.
SpeareA.AveryR., & LawtonL. (1991). Disability, residential mobility, and changes in living arrangements. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 46, S133–142.
38.
TulleE., & MooneyE. (2002). Moving to ‘age-appropriate’ housing: Government and self in later life. Sociology, 36, 685–793.
39.
Ward-GriffinC.HobsonS.MellesP.KloseckM.VandervoortA., & CrillyR. (2004). Falls and fear of falling among community-dwelling seniors: The dynamic tension between exercising precaution and striving for independence. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23, 307–318.
40.
WeigelD. J., & WeigelR. R. (1993). Intergenerational family communication: Generational differences in rural families. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 467–473.
41.
WisemanR. F., & RosemanC. C. (1979). A typology of elderly migration based on the decision-making process. Economic Geography, 55, 324–337.
42.
WorobeyJ. L., & AngelR. J. (1990). Functional capacity and living arrangements of unmarried elderly persons. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45(3), S95–101.
