The concept of “successful aging” is a contested discourse in gerontology. Two conflicting paradigms dominate the discussion: a health promotion activity model, and a model critical of the concept of successful aging. However, this study takes a different perspective and proposes that perhaps we have been striving for the wrong goal. The true quest as we age should not be for successful aging, but our goal should be for resilience, an undervalued and not fully examined concept in aging. Developing resilience is possible for many older adults regardless of social and cultural backgrounds or physical and cognitive impairments, unlike successful aging. This article discusses the concept of resilience from a theoretical resilience framework, applies the framework to a dementia population by providing two in-depth case studies of resilience among people with Alzheimer's disease, and concludes by advocating to move the resilience paradigm more front and center into the gerontological debate on successful aging.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaltesP. B., & BaltesM. M. (1990). Successful aging: Perspectives from behavioral science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BaltesP. B. (1993). The aging mind: Potential and limits. The Gerontologists, 33, 580–594.
3.
BartlettR., & O'ConnorD. (2007). From personhood to citizenship: Broadening the lens for dementia practice and research. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 107–118.
4.
BrodyE. M. (1990). Women in the middle. New York: Springer.
5.
DeBaggioT. (2003). When it gets dark: An enlightened reflection on life with Alzheimer's. New York: The Free Press.
6.
GarmerzyN. (1973). Competence and adaptation in adult schizophrenic patients and children at risk. In DeenS. R. (Ed.), Schizophrenia: The first ten Dean Award lectures (pp. 163–204). New York: MSS Information.
7.
HarrisP. B. (Ed.). (2002). The person with Alzheimer's disease: Pathways to understanding the experience. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
HarrisP. B. (2004). The perspective of younger people with dementia: Still an overlooked population. Social Work in Mental Health, 2, 17–36.
9.
HarrisP. B., & DurkinC. (2002). Building resilience through coping and adapting. In HarrisP. B. (Ed.), The person with Alzheimer's disease: Pathways to understanding the experience (pp. 165–184). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
HarrisP. B., & KeadyJ. (2004). Living with early on-set dementia: Exploring the experience and developing evidence-based guidelines for practice. Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 5, 111–122.
11.
HolsteinM. B., & MinklerM. (2003). Self, society, and the “new gerontology.”The Gerontologist, 43, 787–796.
12.
KahanaE., & KahanaB. (1996). Conceptual and empirical advances in understanding aging well through protective adaptation. In BengtsonV. (Ed.), Adulthood and aging: Research on continuities and discontinuities (pp. 18–41). New York: Springer.
13.
KahanaE., & KahanaB. (2003). Invitation to the life course: Toward new understanding of late life (pp. 225–252). SetterstenR.Jr. (Ed.). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
14.
KahnR. L. (2003). Successful aging. Intended and unintended consequences of a concept. In PoonL. W.GueldmerS. H., & SprouseB. M. (Eds.), Successful aging and adaptation with chronic diseases. New York: Springer.
15.
KnaussJ., & MoyerD. (2006). The role of advocacy in our adventure with Alzheimer's. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 5, 67–72.
16.
KitwoodT. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
LutharS. S., & ZelazoL. B. (2003). Research on resilience. In LutharS. S. (Ed.), Reliance and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversity (pp. 510–549). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
LymanK. (1989). Bringing the social back in: A critique of the biomedicalization of dementia. The Gerontologist, 29, 597–605.
19.
MastenA. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologists, 56, 227–238.
20.
MastenA. S., & CoatsworthJ. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205–222.
21.
MastenA. S., & PowellJ. L. (2003). A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice. In LutharS. S. (Ed.), Reliance and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversity (pp. 1–25). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
MoodyH. R. (2005). From successful aging to conscious aging. In WylkeM. C.WhilehouseP. J., & MorrisD. C. (Eds.), Successful aging through the life span. New York: Springer.
23.
PearlinL. I.MullanJ.SempleJ., & SkateM. (1990). Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. The Gerontologist, 30, 583–594.
24.
PrescopK. L.DodgeH. H.MoryczR. K.SchulzR. M., & GanguliM. (1999). Elders with dementia living in the community with and without caregivers: An epidemiological study. International Psychogeriatrics, 11, 235–250.
25.
RileyM. W. (1998). Letter to the editor. The Gerontologist, 38, 151.
26.
RoweJ. W., & KahnR. I. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37, 433–480.
27.
RoweJ. W., & KahnR. I. (1998). Successful aging: The MacArthur Foundation Study. New York: Pantheon.
28.
SabatS. (2001). The experience of Alzheimer's disease. Life through a tangled veil. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
29.
SnyderL. (1999). Speaking our minds. New York: W. H. Freeman.
30.
SterinG. (2002). Prologue. In HarrisP. B. (Ed.), The person with Alzheimer's disease: Pathways to understanding the experience. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
TaylorR. (2007). Alzheimer's from the inside. Baltimore, MD: Health Professional Press, Inc.
32.
TornstamL. (2005). Gerotranscendence: A developmental theory of positive aging. New York: Springer.
33.
ValiantG. E. (2002). Aging well. New York: Little Brown.
34.
ValiantG. E. (2004). Positive aging. In LinleyA. & JosephS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 521–539). New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
35.
WernerE. E., & SmithR. S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
YatesT. M., & MastenA. S. (2004). Fostering the future: Resilience theory and the practice of positive psychology. In LinleyA. & JosephS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 521–539). New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
37.
ZaritS.ToddP. A., & ZaritJ. M. (1986). Subjective burden of husbands and wives as caregivers: A longitudinal study. The Gerontologist, 26, 260–263.
