This qualitative study of nine women examined the changes in their everyday lives as they cared for their terminally-ill husbands and after their husbands died. It also studied how the women coped with these changes, and how their coping contributed to their identity change from wife to widow. Symbolic interaction was utilized to study the changes in their social relationships, time usage, and the utilization of everyday objects. Initially, these changes eroded identity stability, but the women's efforts to deal with them contributed to the development of new skills, interests, and ultimately, new identities.
CarneyT.IngvarsonM., & TaitD. (2008, January). Experiences of “control” in anorexia nervosa treatment: Delayed coercion, shadow of law, or disseminated power and control?Legal Studies Research Paper 08/07. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
3.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: Norton.
4.
GeorgeL. (1980). Role transitions in later life. Camden, NJ: Brooks/Cole.
5.
GoffmanE. (1961). On the characteristics of total institutions. In GoffmanE. (Ed.), Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates (pp. 3–124). New York: Anchor.
6.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
HeinzW., & KrügerH. (2001). Life course: Innovations and challenges for social research. Current Sociology, 49(2), 29–45.
8.
HewittJ. P. (2003). Symbols, objects, and meanings. In ReynoldsL. T. & Herman-KinneyN. J. (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 307–326). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
9.
LaRossaR., & ReitzesD. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In BossP. G.DohertyW. J.LaRossaR.SchummW. R. & SteinmetzS. K. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A conceptual approach (pp. 135–166). New York: Plenum.
10.
LopataH. Z. (1970). The social involvement of American widows. The American Behavioral Scientist, 14(1), 41–58.
11.
LopataH. Z. (1975). On widowhood: Grief work and identity reconstruction. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8(1), 41–55.
12.
LopataH. Z. (1996). Current widowhood: Myths and realities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
MacRaeH. M. (1995). Women and caring: Constructing self through others. Journal of Women & Aging, 7(1–2), 145–167.
14.
McCrackenG. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Nolen-HoeksemaS., & LarsonJ. (1999). Coping with loss. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
PetkusE. J. (1996). The creative identity: Creative behavior from a symbolic interactionist perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(3), 189–196.
Scannell-DeschE. (2003). Women's adjustment to widowhood: Theory, research, and interventions. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services, 41(5), 28–36.
19.
ScottT. M.CrowtherM. R.SchmidB., & AllenR. S. (2003). Widowhood and spirituality: Coping responses to bereavement. Journal of Women & Aging, 15(2/3), 145–165.
20.
StebbinsR. A. (2003). Sport and leisure. In ReynoldsL. T. & Herman-KinneyN. J. (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 875–893). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
UtzR. L.CarrD.NesseR., & WortmanC. B. (2002). The effect of widowhood on older adults' social participation: An evaluation of activity, disengagement, and continuity theories. Gerontologist, 42(4), 522–533.
23.
van den HoonaardD. K. (1998, July). Moving from the couples' world: Widows' strategies that express the social meaning of widowhood. Paper presented at the meeting of the ISA XIV World Congress of Sociology, Montreal, Canada.
24.
van den HoonaardD. K. (1999). No regrets: Widows' stories about the last days of their husbands' lives. Journal of Aging Studies, 13(1), 59–72.
