We explore from a cross-national perspective three motivations in adult children to provide help to older parents: affectual solidarity, parental need for care, and filial norms. The sample is 1,055 adult children from Norway, Spain, and Israel, countries selected because they represent different family cultures and welfare regimes. Affectual solidarity and parental need for care was found to influence amount of help in all three countries, whereas filial norms was found to have no effect. Country context had a differential impact.
In Israel, affectual solidarity was more strongly associated with amount of help. In Israel and Norway, parents' need for care was related to amount of help; in Spain help provided was high, regardless of parents' need for care.
We demonstrate the universality of motivations to provide help to older parents and the influence of cultural context on these motivations, taking into account within-country differences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
2.
Attias-DonfutC.OggJ., & WolffF. C. (2005). European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 161–173. doi:10.1007/s10433-005-0008-7
3.
BazoT. M., & AncizuI. (2003). Family and service support. In LowensteinA. & OggJ. (Eds.), Oasis—Old age and autonomy: The role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity (pp. 227–257). Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa, Center for Research and Study of Aging.
4.
BrodskyJ.ShnoorY., & Be'erS. (2008). Kshishim b'Israel: Shnaton statisti [The elderly in Israel: Statistical abstract]. Jerusalem, Israel: Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute and Eshel.
5.
CarpenterB. D. (2001). Attachment bonds between adult daughters and their older mothers: Associations with contemporary caregiving. Journals of Gerontology, 56B, 257–267.
6.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Statistical abstracts of Israel. Jerusalem: Author.
7.
CicirelliV. G. (1983). A comparison of helping behavior to elderly parents of adult children with intact and disrupted marriages. The Gerontologist, 23, 619–625.
8.
CicirelliV. G. (1990). Relationship of personal-social variables to belief in paternalism in parent caregiving situations. Psychology and Aging, 5, 458–466. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.458
9.
CicirelliV. G. (1993). Attachment and obligation as daughters' motives for caregiving behavior and subsequent effect on subjective burden. Psychology and Aging, 8, 144–155. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.144
10.
CicirelliV. G. (2003). Influence of mothers' and daughters' paternalism beliefs on caregiving decision making. Research on Aging, 25, 3–21.
11.
DaatlandS. O., & LowensteinA. (2005). Intergenerational solidarity and the family-welfare state balance. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 174–182.
12.
DahlbergL.DemackS., & BambraC. (2007). Age and gender of informal carers: A population-based study in the UK. Health and Social Care in the Community, 15, 439–445.
13.
DaveyA.JankeM. C., & SavlaJ. S. (2005). Antecedents of intergenerational support: Families in context and families as context. In SilversteinM.GiarrussoR., & BengtsonV. L. (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Intergenerational relations across time and place (pp. 29–54). New York: Springer.
14.
EggebeenD. J., & DaveyA. (1998). Do safety nets work? The role of anticipated help in times of need. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 939–950. doi:10.2307/353636
15.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
16.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/0198742002.001.0001
17.
FerreraM. (1996). The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of Europe Social Policy, 6, 17–37. doi:10.1177/095892879600600102
18.
FingermanK. L., & BirdittK. S. (2003). Do age differences in close and problematic family ties reflect the pool of available relatives?Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Science, 58B, 80–87.
19.
FingermanK. L., & HayE. L. (2002). Searching under the streetlight? Age biases in the personal and family relationships literature. Personal Relationships, 9, 415–433. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.09404
20.
FinleyN. J.RobertsD. M., & BanahanB. (1988). Motivators and inhibitors of attitudes of filial obligation toward aging parents. Gerontologist, 28, 73–78.
21.
GansD., & SilversteinM. (2006). Norms of filial responsibility for aging parents across time and generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 961–976. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00307.x
22.
GanongL., & ColemanM. (1999). Changing families, changing responsibilities: Family obligations following divorce and remarriage. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
GierveldJ. D. J., & DykstraP. A. (2008). Virtue is its own reward? Support-giving in the family and loneliness in middle and old age. Ageing and Society, 28, 271–287.
24.
GoldscheiderF. K., & LawtonL. (1998). Family experiences and the erosion of support for intergenerational coresidence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 623–632. doi:10.2307/353533
25.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
HomansG. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt.
27.
HouseJ. S., & KahnR. L. (1985). Measures and concepts of social support. In CohenS. & SymeS. L. (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 83–108). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28.
IkkinkK. K.TilburgT. V., & KnipscheerK. C. P. M. (1999). Perceived instrumental support exchanges in relationships between elderly parents and their adult children: Normative and structural explanations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 831–844. doi:10.2307/354006
29.
KalmijnM., & SaracenoC. (2008). A comparative perspective on intergenerational support. European Societies, 10(3), 479–508. doi:10.1080/14616690701744364
30.
KatzR., & LaveeY. (2005). Families in Israel. In AdamsB. N. & TrostJ. (Eds.), Handbook of world families (pp. 486–506). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
KatzR.LowensteinA.PhillipsJ., & DaatlandS. O. (2005). Theorizing intergenerational family relations. Solidarity, conflict and ambivalence in cross-national contexts. In BengtsonV. L.AcockA. C.AllenK. R.Dilworth-AndersonP. & KleinD. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 393–402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
LeeG. R.PeekC. W., & CowardR. T. (1998). Race differences in filial responsibility expectations among older parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 404–412. doi:10.2307/353857
33.
LowensteinA., & DaatlandS. (2006). Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: Evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing and Society, 26, 203–223. doi:10.1017/S0144686X05004502
34.
LowensteinA.KatzR., & Gur-YaishN. (2008). Cross-national variations in elder care: Antecedents and outcomes. In SzinovaczM. & DaveyA. (Eds.), Caregiving: Cultural, familial, and social contexts (pp. 93–114). New York: Springer.
35.
LowensteinA., & OggJ. (2003). Oasis—Old age and autonomy: The role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa, Center for Research and Study of Aging.
36.
LyonetteC., & YardleyL. (2003). The influence on carer wellbeing of motivations to care for older people and the relationship with the care recipient. Ageing & Society, 23, 487–506. doi:10.1017/S0144686X03001284
37.
MangenD. J.BengtsonV. L., & LandryP. H.Jr. (1988). Measurement of intergenerational relations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
McSweeneyB. (2002). Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55, 89–118.
39.
MinklerM., & EstesC. (1998). Critical gerontology: Perspectives from political and moral economy. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
40.
Motel-KlingebielA.Tesch-RömerC. U., & von KondratowitzH. J. (2005). Welfare states do not crowd out the family: Evidence for functional differentiation from comparative analyses. Ageing and Society, 25, 863–882. doi:10.1017/S0144686X05003971
41.
ReherD. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24, 203–234. doi:10.2307/2807972
42.
SchwarzB., & TrommsdorffG. (2005). The relation between attachment and intergenerational support. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 192–199. doi:10.1007/s10433-005-0005-x
43.
SilversteinM.GansD., & YangF. M. (2006). Intergenerational support to aging parents: The role of norms and needs. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1068–1084. doi:10.1177/0192513X06288120
44.
SundströmG.MalmbergB.CastielloM. S.BarrioE. D.CastejonP.TortosaM. A. (2008). Family care for old people in Europe: Policies and practices. In SzinovaczM. E. & DaveyA. (Eds.), Caregiving contexts: Cultural, familial, and societal implications (pp. 235–268). New York: Springer.
45.
SwartzT. T. (2009). Intergenerational family relations in adulthood: Patterns, variations, and implications in the contemporary United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 191–212. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134615
46.
von KondratowitzH. J. (2003). Comparing welfare states. In LowensteinA. & OggJ. (Eds.), Oasis—Old age and autonomy: The role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity (pp. 25–62). Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa, Center for Research and Study of Aging.
47.
YiC. C., & FarrellM. (2006). Globalization and the intergenerational relations: Cross-cultural perspectives on support and interaction patterns. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1035–1041. doi:10.1177/0192513X06287815
48.
ZunzuneguiM. V.BélandF., & OteroA. (2001). Support from children, living arrangements, self-rated health and depression of the elderly in Spain. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 1090–1099.
