Two prominent theories of lifespan development, socioemotional selectivity theory and selection, optimization, and compensation theory, make similar predictions for differences in the goal representations of younger and older adults. Our purpose was to test whether the goals of younger and older adults differed in ways predicted by these two theories. Older adults and two groups of younger adults (college students and non-students) listed their current goals, which were then coded by independent raters. Observed age group differences in goals generally supported both theories. Specifically, when compared to younger adults, older adults reported more goals focused on maintenance/loss prevention, the present, emotion-focus and generativity, and social selection, and less goals focused on knowledge acquisition and the future. However, contrary to prediction, older adults also showed less goal focusing than younger adults, reporting goals from a broader set of life domains (e.g., health, property/possessions, friendship).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltgassenM.KliegelM.BrandimonteM., & FilippelloP. (2010). Are older adults more social than younger adults? Social importance increases older adults' prospective memory performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17, 312–328.
2.
BaltesP. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380.
3.
BaltesP. B., & BaltesM. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In BaltesP. B. & BaltesM. M. (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M., & LindendbergerU. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471–507.
5.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
6.
BarghJ.ChenM., & BurrowsL. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244.
7.
BarghJ., & GollwitzerP. M. (1994). Environmental control of goal-directed action: Automatic and strategic contingencies between situations and behavior. In SpauldingW. D. (Ed.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 71–124). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
8.
CarstensenL. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338.
9.
CarstensenL. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 151–156.
10.
CarstensenL. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.
11.
CarstensenL. L., & FredricksonB. L. (1998). Influence of HIV status and age on cognitive representations of others. Health Psychology, 17, 494–503.
12.
CarstensenL. L.FungH. H., & CharlesS. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123.
13.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M., & CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.
14.
CarstensenL. L., & MikelsJ. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Research, 14, 117–121.
15.
CarverC. S., & ScheierM. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.
16.
CoatsA. H., & Blanchard-FieldsF. (2008). Emotion regulation in interpersonal problems: The role of cognitive-emotional complexity, emotion regulation goals, and expressivity. Psychology and Aging, 23, 39–51.
17.
CoxW. M., & KlingerE. (2011). Measuring motivation: The motivational structure questionnaire and personal concerns inventory and their variants. In CoxW. M. & KlingerE. (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Goal-based approaches to assessment and intervention with addiction and other problems (2nd ed., pp. 161–204). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
18.
CrossS., & MarkusH. (1991). Possible selves across the life span. Human Development, 34, 230–255.
19.
DavisM. H.KraussL. A., & CapobiancoS. (2009). Age differences in responses to conflict in the workplace. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 68, 339–355.
20.
EarleyP. C.WojnaroskiP., & PrestW. (1987). Task planning and energy expended: Exploration of how goals influence performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 107–114.
21.
EbnerN. C.FreundA. M., & BaltesP. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21, 664–678.
22.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
23.
FingermanK. L., & PerlmutterM. (1995). Future time perspective and life events across adulthood. The Journal of General Psychology, 122, 95–111.
24.
FishbachA.ShahJ. Y., & KruglanskiA. W. (2004). Emotional transfer in goal systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 723–738.
25.
FredricksonB. L., & CarstensenL. L. (1990). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. Psychology and Aging, 5, 335–347.
26.
FreundA. M. (2006). Age-differential motivational consequences of optimization versus compensation focus in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 240–252.
27.
FreundA. M., & BaltesP. B. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: Correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 531–543.
28.
FreundA. M., & BaltesP. B. (2000). The orchestration of selection, optimization, and compensation: An action-theoretical conceptualization of a theory of developmental regulation. In PerrigW. J. & GrobA. (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer (pp. 35–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
FreundA. M., & BaltesP. B. (2002). Life management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 642–662.
30.
FungH. H., & CarstensenL. L. (2004). Motivational changes in response to blocked goals and foreshortened time: Testing alternatives to socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 19, 68–78.
31.
FungH. H.CarstensenL. L., & LangF. R. (2001). Age-related patterns in social networks among European Americans and African Americans: Implications for socioemotional selectivity across the life span. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 185–206.
32.
HeckhausenJ. (1997). Developmental regulation across adulthood: Primary and secondary control of age-related challenges. Developmental Psychology, 33, 176–187.
33.
HeckhausenJ.DixonR. A., & BaltesP. B. (1989). Gains and losses in development throughout adulthood as perceived by different adult age groups, Developmental Psychology, 25, 109–121.
34.
HenryJ. D.MacLeodM. S.PhillipsL. H., & CrawfordJ. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27–39.
35.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
36.
HuberV. L., & NealeM. A. (1987). Effects of self- and competitor goals in performance in an interdependent bargaining task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 197–203.
37.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y., & Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). New York: Academic Press.
38.
LangF. R. (2000). Endings and continuity of social relationships: Maximizing intrinsic benefits within personal networks when feeling near to death. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 155–182.
39.
LangF. R., & CarstensenL. L. (1994). Close emotional relationships in late life: Further support for proactive aging in the social domain. Psychology and Aging, 9, 315–324.
40.
LangF. R., & CarstensenL. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17, 125–139.
41.
LawtonM. P.MossM. S.WinterL., & HoffmanC. (2002). Motivation in later life: Personal projects and well-being. Psychology and Aging, 17, 539–547.
42.
LensW., & GaillyA. (1980). Extension of future time perspective in motivational goals of different age groups. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 3, 1–17.
43.
LockeE. A., & LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.
44.
LöckenhoffC. E., & CarstensenL. L. (2004). Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: The increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. Journal of Personality, 72, 1395–1424.
45.
LöckenhoffC. E., & CarstensenL. L. (2007). Aging, emotion, and health-related decision strategies: Motivational manipulations can reduce age differences. Psychology and Aging, 22, 134–146.
46.
NurmiJ. (1992). Age differences in adult life goals, concerns, and their temporal extension: A life course approach to future-oriented motivation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, 487–508.
47.
OgilvieD. M.RoseK. M., & HeppenJ. B. (2001). A comparison of personal project motives in three age groups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 207–215.
48.
PenningrothS. L., & ScottW. D. (2007). A motivational-cognitive model of prospective memory: The influence of goal relevance. In ColumbusF. (Ed.), Psychology of motivation (pp. 115–128). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
49.
RiedigerM., & FreundA. M. (2006). Focusing and restricting: Two aspects of motivational selectivity in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 21, 173–185.
50.
RobersonL. (1989). Assessing personal work goals in the organizational setting: Development and evaluation of the work concerns inventory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 345–367.
51.
RothkopfE. Z., & BillingtonM. J. (1975). A two-factor model of the effect of goal descriptive directions on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 692–704.
52.
ShahJ. Y., & KruglanskiA. W. (2003). When opportunity knocks: Bottom-up priming of goals by means and its effects on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1109–1122.
53.
SheeranP.WebbT. L., & GollwitzerP. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87–98.
54.
Van LangeP. A. M.OttenW.De BruinE. M. N., & JoiremanJ. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.
