An Ecological Framework of Place: Situating Environmental Gerontology within a Life Course Perspective

Abstract

This article presents an emergent heuristic framework for the core environmental gerontology concept of “place.” Place has been a central concern in the field since the 1970s (Gubrium, 1978) for its hypothesized direct relationship to identity, the self, and agency–suggestive of the appropriateness of lateral theoretical linkages with developmental science. The Ecological Framework of Place (EFP) defines place as a socio-physical milieu involving people, the physical setting, and the program of the place, all catalyzed by situated human activity and fully acknowledging that all four may change over time. The article begins with a concise overview of the EFP before moving on to consider it within three theoretical terrains: place theory, developmental science theory, and environmental gerontology theory. The EFP will be argued to be a place theory which subsumes themes of emergent environmental gerontology theories within a developmental science perspective. Implications for theory, method and practice are discussed. One of the strengths of the model is its ability to serve both research and practice, as is exhibited in its ability to incorporate applied design research and inform architectural decision-making so often lacking in other environmental gerontology models. Place should be viewed as an integrative concept providing opportunities for both environmental gerontology and developmental science to more critically concern the profound role places have in terms of agency, identity and sense of self over the life course.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1987). Place and politics: The geographical mediation of state and society. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.

Antonucci

(1990). Social supports and social relationships. In Binstock

George

(Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (3rd ed., pp. 205–226). New York, NY: Academic.

Archea

(1977), The place of architectural factors in behavioral theories of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 116–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01886.x

Baltes

M. M.

(1996). The many faces of dependency in old age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Baltes

M. M.

Wahl

H-W.

(1992). The dependency-support script in institutions: Generalization to community settings. Psychology and Aging, 7, 409–418.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 1–26.

Barker

R. G.

(1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bell

S. A.

Bern-Klug

Kramer

K. W.

Saunders

J. B.

(2010). Most nursing home social service directors lack training in working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual residents. Social Work in Health Care, 49(9), 814–831.

10.

Berger

Luckmann

(1967). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Doubleday.

11.

Bonnes

Secchiaroli

(1995). Environmental psychology: A psycho-social introduction. London, UK: Sage.

12.

Boschetti

(1995). Attachment to personal possessions: An interpretive study of the older person's experiences. Journal of Interior Design, 21(1), 1–12.

13.

Bourdieu

(1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Bronfenbrenner

(1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513

15.

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Bronfenbrenner

(1994). Ecological models of human development. International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol. 3. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

17.

Bronfenbrenner

(1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In Friedman

Wachs

(Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts (pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

18.

Brush

Meehan

Calkins

(2002). Using the environment to improve intake for people with dementia. Alzheimer's Care Today, 3(4), 330–338.

19.

Calkins

(1988). Design for dementia: Planning environments for the elderly and confused. Owings Mills, MD: National Health Publishing.

20.

Callero

(2003). The sociology of the self. Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 115–133. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036963

21.

Canter

(1977). The psychology of place. London, UK: Architectural Press.

22.

Canter

(1985). Intention, meaning and structure: Social action in its physical context. In Ginsburg

G. P.

Brenner

von Cranach

M. M.

(Eds.), Discovery strategies in the psychology of action (pp. 171–186). London, UK: Academic Press.

23.

Canter

(1986). Putting situations in their place. In Furnham

(Ed.), Social behavior in context (pp. 208–239). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

24.

Canter

(1991). Understanding, assessing, and acting in places: Is an integrative framework possible? In Garling

Evans

(Eds.), Environment, cognition, and action (pp. 191–209). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

25.

Carstensen

L. L.

(1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 151–156. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/20182356

26.

Casey

(2001). Between geography and philosophy: What does it mean to be in the place-world? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(4), 683–693.

27.

Clarke

Marshall

House

Lantz

(2011). The social structuring of mental health over the adult life course: Advancing theory in the sociology of aging. Social Forces, 89(4), 1287–1313.

28.

Cohen

Weisman

G. D.

(1991). Holding on to home: Designing environments for people with dementia. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

29.

Cresswell

(2008). Place: Encountering geography as philosophy. Geography, 93(3), 132–139.

30.

Cresswell

(2013). Place: A short introduction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

31.

Cutchin

M. P.

(2009). Geographical gerontology: New contributions and spaces for development. The Gerontologist, 49(3), 440–444.

32.

Dannefer

(2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(6), S327–S337. doi: 10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327

33.

Moore

K. Diaz

(1999). Dissonance in the dining room: A study of social interaction in a special care unit. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 133–155.

34.

Moore

K. Diaz

(Ed.). (2000). Culture—meaning—architecture: Critical reflections on the work of Amos Rapoport. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

35.

Moore

K. Diaz

(2005). Using place rules and affect to understand environmental fit: A theoretical exploration. Environment and Behavior, 37(3), 330–363.

36.

Moore

K. Diaz

(2012). From environment and behavior to place and experience: Four contributions for change. In Ahrentzen

Despres

Schermer

(Eds.), Building bridges, blurring boundaries: The Milwaukee school in environment-behavior studies. Quebec City, Canada: Villes Regions Monde.

37.

Moore

K. Diaz

Ekerdt

(2011). Age and the cultivation of place. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 189–192. Available at https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.010

38.

Moore

K. Diaz

Geboy

Weisman

G. D.

(2006). Designing a better day: Guidelines for adult and dementia day services centers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

39.

Elder

(1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786971

40.

Fishman

(1999). The case for pragmatic psychology. New York, NY: New York University Press.

41.

Garfinkel

(1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

42.

Geboy

(2005). Architecture as a catalyst for organizational change: Facilitating a person-centered approach to care in an adult/dementia day center. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.

43.

Geboy

Meyer-Arnold

(2011). Person-centered care in practice: Tools for transformation. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.

44.

Giddens

(1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

45.

Golant

(2011). The quest for residential normalcy by older adults: Relocation but one pathway. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(3), 193–205. Available at https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.003

46.

Groat

(Ed.). (1995). Giving places meaning. London, UK: Academic Press.

47.

Gubrium

(1978). Notes on the social organization of senility. Urban Life, 7(1), 23–44. doi: 10.1177/089124167800700102

48.

Gustafson

(2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 5–16.

49.

Heckhausen

Wrosch

Schulz

(2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32. doi: 10.1037/a0017668

50.

Helson

(1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

51.

Hitlin

Elder

(2007). Time, self and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 170–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00303.x

52.

Hummon

(1992). Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In Altman

Low

(Eds.), Place attachment. New York, NY: Plenum.

53.

Hung

Chaudhury

(2011). Exploring personhood in dining experiences of residents with dementia in long-term care facilities. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(1), 1–12.

54.

Kendig

(2003). Directions in environmental gerontology: A multidisciplinary field. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 611–615.

55.

Kitchen

(1998). “Out of place,” “knowing one's place”: Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability and Society, 13(3), 343–356.

56.

Krause

(1994). Stressors in salient social roles and well-being in later life. Journal of Gerontology, 49(3), P137–P148.

57.

Lang

(2004). Social motivation across the life span . In Lang

F. R.

Fingerman

K. L.

(Eds.), Growing together: Personal relationships across the lifespan (pp. 341–367). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

58.

Lawton

M. P.

(1980). Environment and aging. Albany, NY: Center for the Study of Aging.

59.

Lawton

M. P.

(1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In Lawton

M. P.

Windley

Byerts

(Eds.), Aging and the environment: Theoretical approaches (pp. 33–59). New York, NY: Springer.

60.

Lawton

M. P.

(1989). Behavior-relevant ecological factors. In Schaie

Schooler

(Eds.), Social structure and aging: Psychological processes (pp. 57–78). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA Publishers.

61.

Lawton

M. P.

(1991). A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. In Birren

Lubben

Rowe

Deutchman

(Eds.), The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly (pp. 4–27). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

62.

Lawton

M. P.

(1998). Environment and aging: Theory revisited. In Scheidt

R. J.

Windley

P. G.

(Eds.), Environment and aging theory: A focus on housing (pp. 1–31). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

63.

Lawton

M. P.

Nahemow

(1973). Ecology and the aging process. In Eisdorfer

Lawton

M. P.

(Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619–674). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

64.

Lawton

M. P.

Simon

(1968). The ecology of social relationships in housing for the elderly. The Gerontologist, 8, 108–115.

65.

Lee

M. S.

Crittenden

K. S.

(1996). Social support and depression among elderly Korean immigrants in the United States. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 42(4), 313–327.

66.

Lerner

(2007). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In Damon

Lerner

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1; pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Wiley.

67.

Lerner

(2012). Developmental science: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Developmental Science, 6(½): 29–36. doi: 10.3233/DEV-2012-12102

68.

Lewin

(1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

69.

Massey

(1993). Power geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Bird

Curtis

Putnam

Robertson

Tickner

(Eds.), Mapping the futures. London, UK: Routledge.

70.

Mead

G. H.

(1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

71.

Moos

(1980). The environmental quality of residential care settings. In Stough

Wandersman

(Eds.), Optimizing environments: Research and policy. Washington, DC: EDRA.

72.

Murray

(1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

73.

Norberg-Schulz

(1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York, NY: Rizzoli.

74.

Oswald

Wahl

H-W.

(2013). Creating and sustaining homelike places in residential environments. In Rowles

Bernard

(Eds.), Environmental gerontology: Making meaningful places in old age (pp. 53–77). New York, NY: Springer.

75.

Phillipson

(2007). The “elected” and the “excluded”: Sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing and Society, 27(3), 321–342.

76.

Pred

(1984). Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2), 279–297.

77.

Rapoport

(1994). A critical look at the concept “place.” In The spirit and power of place. Human environment and sacrality (pp. 31–45). Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University Press.

78.

Regnier

(2002). Design for assisted living: Guidelines for housing the physically and mentally frail. New York, NY: Wiley.

79.

Relph

(1976). Place and placelessness. London, UK: Pion.

80.

Robson

(2011). Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

81.

Rowles

G. D.

(1983). Geographical dimensions of social support in rural Appalachia. In Rowles

Ohta

(Eds.), Aging and milieu: Environmental perspectives on growing old (pp. 111–130). New York, NY: Academic Press.

82.

Rowles

G. D.

Ravdal

(2002). Aging, place, and meaning in the face of changing circumstances. Challenges of the third age: Meaning and purpose in later life (pp. 81–114). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

83.

Rowles

G. D.

Watkins

J. F.

(2003). History, habit, heart and hearth: On making spaces into places. In Aging independently: Living arrangements and mobility (pp. 77–96). New York, NY: Springer.

84.

Rubinstein

(1989). The home environments of older people: A description of the psychosocial processes linking person to place. Journal of Gerontology, 44(2), S45–S53. doi: 10.1093/geronj/44.2.S45

85.

Rubinstein

de Medeiros

(2004). Ecology and the aging self. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 23, 59–84. ISBN-13: 9780826117342

86.

Sack

R. D.

(1997). Homo geographicus: A framework for action, awareness, and moral concern. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

87.

Scheidt

R. J.

Norris-Baker

(2004). The general ecological model revisited: Evolution, current status, and continuing challenges. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 23, 34–58. ISBN-13: 9780826117342

88.

Scheidt

R. J.

Schwarz

(2010). Environmental gerontology: A sampler of issues and applications. In Cavanaugh

J. C.

Cavanaugh

(Eds.), Aging in America (Vol. 1; pp. 156–176). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

89.

Scheidt

Windley

(2006). Environmental gerontology: Progress in the post-Lawton era. In Birren

Schaie

K. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6th ed.; pp. 105–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ISBN-13: 9780121012656.

90.

Schulz

Heckhausen

(1996). A life-span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51, 702–714. doi: 10.1037/0003-66X.51.7.702

91.

Seo

Y. K.

Mazumdar

(2011). Feeling at home: Korean Americans in senior public housing. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(3), 233–242.

92.

Shanahan

Elder

(2002). History, agency and the life course. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 48, 145–186.

93.

Sime

J. D.

(1986). Creating places or designing spaces? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1), 49–63.

94.

Stedman

(2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561–581.

95.

Tuan

Y-F.

(1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

96.

Wahl

H.-W.

(2001). Environmental influences on aging and behavior. In Birren

J. E.

Schaie

K. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed.; pp. 215–237). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

97.

Wahl

H.-W.

Lang

(2004). Aging in context across the adult life course: Integrating physical and social environmental research perspectives. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 23, 1–33. ISBN-13: 9780826117342

98.

Wahl

H.-W.

Oswald

Zimprich

(1999). Everyday competence in visually impaired older adults: A case for person-environment perspectives. The Gerontologist, 39, 140–149.

99.

Wahl

H.-W.

Weisman

G. D.

(2003). Environmental gerontology at the beginning of the new millennium: Reflections on its historical, empirical and theoretical development. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 616–627. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.5.616

100.

Weisman

G. D.

(2001). The place of people in architectural design. In Pressman

(Ed.), The architect's portable design handbook: A guide to best practices (pp. 158–170). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

101.

Weisman

G. D.

Chaudhury

Moore

K. Diaz

(2000). Theory and practice of place: Toward an integrative model. In The many dimensions of aging: Essays in honor of M. Powell Lawton (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Springer.