Beneath the renewed political emphasis on computer use in primary (K-6) schools the place for the pupil has been somewhat taken-for-granted. Indeed, the current U.K. National Grid for Learning initiative is founded on the underlying assumption that children will quickly and effortlessly adapt to using new technologies. This article, therefore, explores the perceptions and views of primary school children in explaining, discussing, and rationalizing their use (or otherwise) of computers in the primary classroom. Based on focus group interview data with 267 pupils from five schools in South and Mid-Wales, the article presents four recurring themes which children used to understand and describe their engagement with computers in school. These are broadly grouped into: (1) the speed and ease of work-processes when using computers; (2) the extending or curtailing of learners' abilities when using computers; (3) freedoms and restrictions of the finished product when using computers and, finally, (4) concerns over originality and authenticity when using computers. From this basis the article goes onto discuss possible ways of more effectively presenting computers to pupils in classroom settings through both policy and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaudrillardJ. (1997). Objects, images and the possibilities of aesthetic illusion. In ZurbruggN. (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: Art and artefact. London: Sage.
2.
BlomeyerR. (1993). A case study of microcomputers in art education. In BeynonJ. & MaCkayH. (Eds.), Computers in the classroom: More questions than answers. London: Falmer.
3.
BowerM. (1999, March 15). Half of all primaries let pupils down on IT. Western Mail, p. 16.
4.
BrosnanM. (1997). The fourth ‘R’: Are teachers hindering computer literacy in school children?BPS Education Section Review, 21(1), 29–38.
5.
BuckinghamD. (1999). Superhighway or road to nowhere? Children's relationships with digital technology. English in Education, 33(1), 3–12.
6.
BuckinghamD. (2000). After the death of childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic media. Cambridge: Policy.
7.
BushC. G. (1997). Women and the assessment of technology. In TeichA. H. (Ed.), Technology and the future (7th ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press.
8.
CareyS. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
ChalkleyT. W., & NicholasD. (1997). Teachers' use of information technology: Observations of primary school classroom practice. ASLIB Proceedings, 49(4), 97–107.
10.
ChiaJ., & DuthieB. (1994). Computer-based art learning: Primary children's responses. Computers and Education, 23(3), 197–209.
11.
ConnollyP. (1997). In search of authenticity: Researching young children's perspectives. In PollardA.ThiessenD., & FilerA. (Eds.), Children and their curriculum: The perspectives of primary and elementary school children. London: Falmer.
12.
CubittS. (1998). Digital aesthetics. London: Sage.
13.
Department for Education and Employment. (1997a). Connecting the learning society. London: Stationary Office.
14.
Department for Education and Employment. (1997b). Survey of information technology in schools. Statistical Bulletin 6/97.
15.
Department for Education and Employment. (1999). Survey of information technology in schools. Statistical First Release 13/99.
16.
DevonR. F. (1987). In praise of computer illiteracy. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 7, 338–343.
17.
DodoricoL., & ZammunerV. L. (1993). The influence of using a word processor on children's story writing. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(1), 51–64.
18.
FeenbergA. (1995). Alternative modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
FloresJ. G., & AlonsoC. G. (1995). Using focus groups in educational research. Evaluation Review, 19(1): 84–101.
20.
GlaserB. G., & StraussL. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, Aldine.
21.
GrahamG. (1999). The Internet: A philosophical inquiry. London: Routledge.
22.
GreenB., & BigumC. (1993). Aliens in the classroom. Australian Journal of Education, 37(2), 119–141.
23.
GreenJ. (1997). Risk and the construction of social identity: Children's talk about accidents. Sociology of Health & Illness, 19, 14–21.
24.
IgbariaM.SchiffmanS., & WieckowskiT. (1994). The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 13(6), 349–361.
25.
JeffreyR., & WoodsP. (1997). The relevance of creative teaching: Pupil's views. In PollardA.ThiessenD., & FilerA. (Eds.), Children and their curriculum: The perspectives of primary and elementary school children. London: Falmer.
26.
KavanaghP. (1998, November 1). School contracts send RM to top of the class. Sunday Times, 6.12.
27.
KreugerR. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage.
28.
LepperM., & MaloneT. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In SnowR. & FarrM. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
LepperM., & ChabayR. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 217–230.
30.
LevinsonP. (1997). The soft edge: A natural history and future of the information revolution. London: Routledge.
31.
LivingstoneS. (1999). Young people new media. London: LSE.
32.
MarshallJ. D. (2000). Electronic writing and the wrapping of language. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(1), 135–149.
33.
MorganD. L., & SpanishM. T. (1984). Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 7(3), 253–270.
34.
MORI (1997). The British and technology: The Motorola report 1997. Basingstoke: Motorola.
35.
PapertS. (1993). The children's machine. New York: Basic Books.
36.
PatemanT. (1998). Aesthetic engagement. Aspects of Education, 55, 18–24.
37.
PollardA.ThiessenD., & FilerA. (1997). New challenges in taking children's curricular perspectives seriously. In PollardA.ThiessenD., & FilerA. (Eds.), Children and their curriculum: The perspectives of primary and elementary school children, London: Falmer.
38.
ReayD., & WiliamD. (1999). I'll be a nothing: Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 343–354.
39.
SangerJ., with WillsonJ.DaviesB., & WhittakerR. (1997). Young children, videos and computer games: Issues for teachers and parents. London: Falmer.
40.
SchofieldJ. W. (1995). Computer and classroom culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SchwartzH. (1996). The culture of the copy: Striking likenesses, unreasonable facsimiles, New York: Zone.
42.
ScottA. P. (1998). The everyday aesthetics of computer education. In BromleyH. & AppleM. W. (Eds.), Educational/technology/power: Educational computing as a social practice. New York: SUNY Press.
43.
SelwynN., & BullonK. (2000). Primary school children's use of ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 321–332.
44.
SinghP. (1993). Institutional discourse and practice. A case study of the social construction of technological competence in the primary classroom. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(1), 39–58.
45.
SinghP. (1997). From software design to classroom practice: An Australian case study of the gendered production, distribution and acquisition of computing knowledge. In MarshallC. (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling. London: Falmer.
StewartD. W., & ShamdasaniP. N. (1992). Focus groups: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
48.
StraussA. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
StreibelM. J. (1988). Re-contextualising computers in education: A response to Heinich and Damarin. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 36(3), 153–160.
50.
ThiessenD. (1997). In PollardA.ThiessenD., & FilerA. (Eds.), Children and their curriculum: The perspectives of primary and elementary school children. London: Falmer.
51.
TorkzadehG., & AnguloI.E. (1992). The concept and correlates of computer anxiety. Behaviour and Information Technology, 11(2), 99–108.
52.
TurkleS. (1984). The second self. New York: Simon & Schuster.
53.
WalkerdineV. (1998). Children in cyberspace: A new frontier. In Lesnik-ObersteinK. (Ed.), Children in culture: Approaches to childhood. London: Macmillan.
54.
WildM. (1996). Technology refusal: Rationalising the failure of student and beginning teachers to use computers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 134–143.
55.
WilsonV. (1997). Focus groups: A useful qualitative method for education research?British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 209–224.
56.
WoodD. (1998). How children think and learn (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell.
57.
WoodsP. (1990). The happiest days?How pupils cope with school. London: Falmer.
58.
YeomansD.WilliamsR., & MartinA. (1995). From verbal to horizontal? A longitudinal study of information technology in ten school. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 4(3), 329–350.
59.
ZuboffS. (1997). In the age of the smart machine. In TeichA. H. (Ed.), Technology and the future (7th ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press.
