The Modified Purpose in Life Scale: A Cross-National Validity Study

Abstract

Although the original 20-item Purpose in Life Test (PIL) has been subjected to various reliability and validity tests, its use has been limited largely to American culture. In this paper ten items were selected from the original scale, and both directionality and response categories were modified. This Ten-Item Modified Purpose in Life Test was then validated through item analyses by using two cross-national samples of elderly people. One sample consisted of 177 retirees from the school system in Payne County, Oklahoma, and the other consisted of 202 retired teachers in Taipei, Taiwan. It was concluded from this study that the Ten-Item Modified Purpose in Life Scale can be reduced to the Seven-Item Modified Purpose in Life Scale as an alternative measure for comparing the psychological well-being of the elderly cross-nationally.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Warwick

and Osherson

(eds.), Comparative Research Methods, Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 1973.

Crumbaugh

and Maholick

, An Experimental Study in Existentialism: The Psychometric Approach to Frankl's Concept of Noongenic Neurosis, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, pp. 200–207, 1964.

Crumbaugh

and Maholick

, The Case for Frankl's Will to Meaning Journal of Existential Psychiatry, 4, pp. 43–48, 1963.

Crumbaugh

, Cross-Validation of Purpose in Life Test Based on Frankl's Concepts, Journal of Individual Psychology, 24, pp. 74–81, 1968.

Hooper

, “Some Results from the Use of the Purpose in Life Inventory in College Classes Between 1966 and 1968,” unpublished paper, San Jose State, 1968.

Muilenberg

, “Meaning in Life: Its Significance in Psychotherapy,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, 1968.

Doerries

, Purpose in Life and Social Participation, Journal of Individual Psychology, 26, pp. 50–53, 1970.

Shean

and Fechtmann

, Purpose-in-Life Scores of Student Marijuana Users, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, pp. 112–113, 1971.

Robl

, “An Experimental Program to Increase the Probability of Academic Success for the ‘High Risk’ College Aspirant,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1971.

10.

Ogle

, “The College Experience and Tolerance: A Study of Intervening Variables,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1972.

11.

Bourdette

, “Some Relationships between Purpose in Life and Longitudinal Variables in a College Environment,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1974.

12.

Acuff

and Allen

, Hiatus in “Meaning”: Disengagement for Retired Professors, Journal of Gerontology, 25, pp. 126–128, 1970.

13.

Lewis

H. C.

, “Meaning and Adjustment: A Study of Active Professionals, Professors and Clergy of a Southwestern State,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1972.

14.

Wheaton

, “A Longitudinal Study of Prison Recidivism with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and the Purpose in Life Test,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1972.

15.

Yarnell

T. D.

, PIL Test: Further Correlates, Journal of Individual Psychology, 27, pp. 76–91, 1971.

16.

Corbett

S. L.

, “Social Structural Labeling and Self-Labeling of the Aged,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1974.

17.

Bourdette

and Dodder

R. A.

, The Purpose in Life Test: What Does It Measure?, Free Inquiry, 4, pp. 1–9, 1976.

18.

Bradburn

N. M.

, The Sturcture of Psychological Well-Being, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1969.

19.

Moriwaki

S. Y.

, The Affect Balance Scale: A Validity Study with Aged Samples, Journal of Gerontology, 29, pp. 73–78, 1974.