This article discusses how the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) addresses the task of conducting international policy research. The article begins with a descriptive account of CERI's work, including the way member countries shape the research agenda. Several issues which relate to how research evidence is compiled within an international context are addressed. First, why the supposed priority area of lifelong learning is only weakly supported by systematic research is considered. The author raises the question of how we are to judge the quality and impact of international research work, especially where it is policy-related. He suggests that an increasing focus on the outcomes of education raises questions about causality in a policy research context. This leads to some brief consideration of evaluation of research, and of the country as a unit of methodological analysis. Finally, he asks what might be meant by learning from international experience.
References
1.
AdamsRaymond J. (2003) Response to ‘Cautions on OECD's Recent Educational Survey (PISA)’, Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), pp. 377–389.
2.
AngristJoshua D. (2004) American Education Research Changes Tack, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(2), pp. 198–212.
3.
BerhmanJ. & StaceyN. (Eds) (1997) The Social Benefits of Education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
CERI/OECD (1973) Recurrent Education: A strategy for lifelong learning. Paris: OECD.
5.
CERI/OECD (1975) Recurrent Education: Trends and issues. Paris: OECD.
6.
CERI/OECD (2001a) Understanding the Brain: Towards a new learning science. Paris: OECD.
7.
CERI/OECD (2001b) What Schools for the Future?Paris: OECD.
8.
CERI/OECD (2004) Internationalisaton and Trade in Higher Education. Paris: OECD.
CoffieldF., (Ed.) (2000) Differing Visions of a Learning Society: Research findingsvolume 2. Bristol: Policy Press.
11.
DaleRoger (2004) International Organisations and the Sectoral Division of ‘Education Policy’, paper presented to European Congress on Educational Research, Crete, September 2004.
12.
DelorsJ. (1996) Learning: The treasure within. Paris: UNESCO.
13.
ForayD. & HargreavesD. (2003) The Production of Knowledge in Different Sectors: A model and some hypotheses, London Review of Education, 1(1), pp. 7–19.
14.
HargreavesD. (1999) The Production, Mediation and Use of Professional Knowledge among Teachers and Doctors: A comparative analysis, in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Knowledge Management in Learning Society, pp. 219–238. Paris: OECD.
15.
IstanceD. (2003) Schooling and Lifelong Learning: Insights from OECD analysis, European Journal of Education, 38(1), pp. 85–98
16.
IstanceD.SchuetzeH.G. & SchullerT. (2002) International Perspectives on Lifelong Learning: From recurrent education to the knowledge society. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
17.
LevinB. (2004) Making Research Matter More, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(56).
18.
LukesS. (1963) Power. London: Macmillan.
19.
MartensK.BalzerC.SackmannR. & WeymannA. (2004) Comparing Governance of International Organisations — the EU, the OECD and educational policy. TranState Working Papers, No. 7. Bremen: Collaborative Research Centre, University of Bremen.
20.
McGawB. (2004) Australian Mathematics Learning in an International Context, paper presented at MERGA 27, the Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, ‘Mathematics Education for the Third Millennium: Towards 2010’, Townsville, 27–30 June 2004.
21.
MitchellS. D. (2003) Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1996) Lifelong Learning for All. Paris: OECD.
23.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001) Knowledge and Skills for Life. First results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
24.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2003) Beyond Rhetoric: Adult learning policies and practices. Paris: OECD.
25.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2004a) Completing the Foundation for Lifelong Learning: An OECD survey of upper secondary schools. Paris: OECD.
26.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2004b) Learning for Tomorrow's World: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
27.
PapadopoulosG.S. (1994) Education 1960–1990: The OECD perspective. Paris: OECD.
28.
PraisS.J. (2003) Cautions on OECD's Recent Educational Survey (PISA), Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), pp. 139–163.
29.
RinneR.KalloJ. & HokkaS. (2004) Too Eager to Comply? OECD Education Policies and the Finnish Response, European Educational Research Journal, 3(2), pp. 454–484.
30.
SchullerT. (2001) Modelling and Measuring the Wider Benefits of Learning: A synthesis. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
31.
SchullerT.PrestonJ.HammondC.Brassett-GrundyA. & BynnerJ. (2004) The Benefits of Learning: The impact of education on health, family life and social capital. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
32.
TeichlerUlrich (2005) The European Knowledge Base on Education: What can be expected from European research?REDCOM seminar on Creating a European Knowledge Basis on Education, Kassel, Germany.
33.
WolterS. (2004) OECD Examiner's Report on Educational Research and Development in England, European Educational Research Journal, 3(2), pp. 510–526.
